Modern scientists talk about ‘innateness’ and ‘language’ trigger etc but still cannot explain how a child is able to speak given the impoverished nature of linguistic input presented to the child.
What does evolutionism say about child language acquisition?
Evolutionism cannot explain child language acquisition when it should be able to do so.
It is impossible to show how children could learn a language unless one assumes that CHILDREN HAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE MACHINERY IN PLACE BEFORE THEY START..
'Children learn languages that are governed by highly subtle and abstract principles, and they do so without explicit instruction or any other environmental clues to the nature of such principles.' How is this possible?
How did this cognitive machinery arise? There are more words than necessary for us to survive, by a
‘couple of million unnecessary words. Why did we develop these words?
This area of linguistics belongs to the cognitive sciences. Vamjok, we are going to pry your brains open to find out how you think
Survival of the fittest? No problem. The evolutionary process will erase you from their database of those who will survive, to be replaced by those who are more systematic and those who possess better METHODOLOGY in their heads. Let the process begin..
Modern scientists talk about ‘innateness’ and ‘language’ trigger etc but still cannot explain how a child is able to speak given the impoverished nature of linguistic input presented to the child.
What does evolutionism say about child language acquisition?
Evolutionism cannot explain child language acquisition when it should be able to do so.
It is impossible to show how children could learn a language unless one assumes that CHILDREN HAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE MACHINERY IN PLACE BEFORE THEY START..
'Children learn languages that are governed by highly subtle and abstract principles, and they do so without explicit instruction or any other environmental clues to the nature of such principles.' How is this possible?
How did this cognitive machinery arise? There are more words than necessary for us to survive, by a
‘couple of million unnecessary words. Why did we develop these words?
This area of linguistics belongs to the cognitive sciences. Vamjok, we are going to pry your brains open to find out how you think
Survival of the fittest? No problem. The evolutionary process will erase you from their database of those who will survive, to be replaced by those who are more systematic and those who possess better METHODOLOGY in their heads. Let the process begin..
throwing smoke screen~~
Modern scientists talk about ‘innateness’ and ‘language’ trigger etc but still cannot explain how a child is able to speak given the impoverished nature of linguistic input presented to the child.
What does evolutionism say about child language acquisition?
Evolutionism cannot explain child language acquisition when it should be able to do so.
It is impossible to show how children could learn a language unless one assumes that CHILDREN HAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE MACHINERY IN PLACE BEFORE THEY START..
'Children learn languages that are governed by highly subtle and abstract principles, and they do so without explicit instruction or any other environmental clues to the nature of such principles.' How is this possible?
How did this cognitive machinery arise? There are more words than necessary for us to survive, by a
‘couple of million unnecessary words. Why did we develop these words?
This area of linguistics belongs to the cognitive sciences. Vamjok, we are going to pry your brains open to find out how you think
Survival of the fittest? No problem. The evolutionary process will erase you from their database of those who will survive, to be replaced by those who are more systematic and those who possess better METHODOLOGY in their heads. Let the process begin..
James Vanilla: I doubt that self-proclaimed Rojak Scientist (Vamjok) understands what you are trying to tell him. Just watch out of his reply....absolutely nothing but words of vulgarity used by many uneducated aunties and uncles.
Nonetheless, we are called to defend the word of God, and to destroy those satanic lies....like evolution, fossils of million of years proved their ancesorship, DNA is just simple chemicals evolved from nowhere. Nothing is more important than to tell people that we are indeed His proud creation, and all living and non-living things we see around us are created by Living God, Lord Jesus.
Psalm23
Modern scientists talk about ‘innateness’ and ‘language’ trigger etc but still cannot explain how a child is able to speak given the impoverished nature of linguistic input presented to the child.
What does evolutionism say about child language acquisition?
Evolutionism cannot explain child language acquisition when it should be able to do so.
It is impossible to show how children could learn a language unless one assumes that CHILDREN HAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE MACHINERY IN PLACE BEFORE THEY START..
'Children learn languages that are governed by highly subtle and abstract principles, and they do so without explicit instruction or any other environmental clues to the nature of such principles.' How is this possible?
How did this cognitive machinery arise? There are more words than necessary for us to survive, by a
‘couple of million unnecessary words. Why did we develop these words?
This area of linguistics belongs to the cognitive sciences. Vamjok, we are going to pry your brains open to find out how you think
Survival of the fittest? No problem. The evolutionary process will erase you from their database of those who will survive, to be replaced by those who are more systematic and those who possess better METHODOLOGY in their heads. Let the process begin..
Evolution do not explain everything like what you Christians thought that your storybook explain everything on earth with insanity . you want to know about art you go to art school and not law school . as simple as that . So what does child language acquisition got to do with your " god " ?
if you can believe a snake can talk , stay alive in a fish stomach ...ect ,what else needed to said about your insanely belief you don't even think logically : by the way do you go see doctor when you are sick or just kneel infront of oxygen and pray
Modern scientists talk about ‘innateness’ and ‘language’ trigger etc but still cannot explain how a child is able to speak given the impoverished nature of linguistic input presented to the child.
What does evolutionism say about child language acquisition?
Evolutionism cannot explain child language acquisition when it should be able to do so.
It is impossible to show how children could learn a language unless one assumes that CHILDREN HAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF NONLINGUISTIC COGNITIVE MACHINERY IN PLACE BEFORE THEY START..
'Children learn languages that are governed by highly subtle and abstract principles, and they do so without explicit instruction or any other environmental clues to the nature of such principles.' How is this possible?
How did this cognitive machinery arise? There are more words than necessary for us to survive, by a
‘couple of million unnecessary words. Why did we develop these words?
This area of linguistics belongs to the cognitive sciences. Vamjok, we are going to pry your brains open to find out how you think
Survival of the fittest? No problem. The evolutionary process will erase you from their database of those who will survive, to be replaced by those who are more systematic and those who possess better METHODOLOGY in their heads. Let the process begin..
