SGs Cannot Retire - Where is Our Money?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=1]Longest Retirements Fuel Pressure for Singapore Remodel[/h]
icZ_Qm.UZA4o-300x199.jpg
(19 Apr) – Singaporean Richard Mui joined the ranks of the world’s longest-living retirees when his career ended in 2010. Three years on, the 54-year-old can no longer afford to pay his father’s medical bills, and worries about putting his two children through university.

Almost half a century after independence, Singaporeans now live the most number of years after leaving the workforce, according to the Global Sunset Index of 68 countries compiled by Bloomberg. In the world’s sixth-most expensive city, 41 percent of more than 1,000 residents surveyed by HSBC Holdings Plc (5) said they haven’t saved for retirement, with nearly half of them blaming living costs for hampering efforts.

“The standard of living has improved, but the cost of living, we’re feeling the pinch,” said Mui, who’s made S$4,000 ($3,240) in the past six months as a part-time taxi driver, compared with S$12,000 a month at digital-storage device company SM Summit Holdings Ltd. before a corporate takeover put him out of a job. “The Singapore government is one of the richest in the world but yet the people don’t feel they are rich.”

Mui’s experience encapsulates the economic success that forged Southeast Asia’s only developed nation, as well as the challenges emerging after decades of policies emphasizing self- reliance over state-funded welfare. An aging population and voter demands for more government aid for the poor and elderly have put pressure on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to boost social spending even as growth slows.

The ruling People’s Action Party will probably keep urging Singaporeans to take care of themselves, as any other method could impose excessive demands on the government’s coffers, said Eugene Tan, an assistant law professor at Singapore Management University and a non-elected member of Parliament.
[h=2]Bigger Burden[/h]“Given that Singaporeans are living longer after retirement, and given that we now have smaller families, the question is whether that traditional model would be as robust,” he said. “This could point toward an evolving social compact where the state will now have to take on a bigger burden than it has been accustomed to.”

Lee warned in his August National Day Rally address that Singapore will need to raise taxes in the next two decades as the government boosts social spending to support an aging population. :oIo: He pledged to ensure sufficient affordable housing for citizens and add nursing homes for the elderly, while proposing measures to boost the country’s birth rate.

“We’re going to have to spend more on health care, substantially more,” Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said in a February interview. “A very key objective is to provide a greater sense of security in retirement for the middle-income group when they retire.”
[h=2]Larger Share[/h]Still, while the government will take on a larger share of medical costs after a review of the health-care financing system, it will continue to make individuals pay a portion, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Grace Fu was cited as saying by the Straits Times this week. :oIo:

Singaporean men live an average 20.8 years after retirement while their female counterparts have 25.6 years, according to the Bloomberg Sunset Index. The measure, which places Singapore ahead of France and South Korea, estimates the age at which residents leave the workforce and subtracts this from their life expectancy. A 2012 Bloomberg study on the healthiest nations awarded the highest grade to Singapore out of 145 countries.

While the nation’s gross domestic product per capita climbed to $50,123 in 2011 from $516 in 1965, funding retirement is a challenge as lifespans increase and living costs soar, fueling public discontent that led to record opposition gains in the 2011 general election.
.
More in: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...ents-fuel-pressure-for-singapore-remodel.html
.
 
[h=2]15 Responses[/h]
  • Dear Patriotic Singaporean,
    I believe many Singaporeans want to do continue to work like active ageism if their health permits.
    In many advanced OECD countries, they have legislation to protect citizens in terms of “Hire and Train own Citizens First”, promote active ageism by banning discrimination against ageism, race, color, gender, and etc, i.e.: all vacancy advertisements carry statement like “Equal opportunity employee, citizen/PR only, etc”; hence, these countries have higher labor force participation rate and many citizens continue to work till retirement age.
    However, in Singapore, the lax and liberal manpower and immigration policies, lack of legislation protecting own citizens first, banning ageism, gender, etc, many employers are to do whatever they like to do to boost profit, like replacing Singaporeans with cheaper foreign workers here.
    Hence, many Singaporeans like Richard Mui could not afford to retire while could not find any suitable employment since employers find easier to replace Singaporean with cheaper foreign workers.
    This shows the ruling party, PAP cares more about making monies and care more for the rich/elite/foreigner/connected rather than caring and serving Singaporean first.
    A tragedy for Singapore and Singaporean if PAP continues to rule and forever.
    I think Singapore and Singaporean deserve better to have at least an alternate party or coalition to govern for a change in GE 2016.

    by <CITE>Singaporean Talent</CITE> on Apr 20, 2013 at 10:28 pm Singaporean Talent(Quote)
 
This ruling govt is greedy and vicious. The first poster said it
very clearly. This govt is never for the citizen, never really
into providing the basic services that a govt is required to provide
for its citizens.
Through the years, we know very clearly now how greedy and vicious
this ruling govt is.
Just look at how quick they are to force the taxpayers to pay them
multimillion salary a year, pension, and millions in directorhips
and chairmanships fees in govt owned companies.
Not to mention the practice of nepotism, croynism and exceptionalism
for the top echelon of the ruling party. We all know where these
are found.
Let us vote them out in 2016. Vote out the greedy ruling party
and have a new dawn for Singapore and Singaporeans.
The ruling party is only in it for themselves.
Dont believe them again.

by <CITE>Change is good</CITE> on Apr 21, 2013 at 2:00 am Change is good(Quote)
 
This is my take on the matter.

Living long is a curse, I rather have a short and healthy life than a long and painful one. Death is part of life, deal with it.

I have long given up on the idea of retirement in Singapore. Its also funny to think that many who are older and having kids and now worrying about putting their kids through school. After 35, I told myself I wont have kids as I know the shit that will happen to workers at 40. Imagine have kids at 40. For an employee that is the most vulnerable stage of life as companies are out to get you at that age and u have mouths to feed. Its like fighting a multi front war.

My plan is when my time comes, to retire in a cheaper country like Indon, or pinoyland. with 300K sing in the bank and spending wisely,,I can retire for a long time there. the trick is not to be too ambitious and greedy. Live with what you have and plan accordingly.

For those at the 'vulnerable' stage i have mentioned, too bad for u, u made your bed and u choose to have kids etc. U deal with the situation. Life in Singapore is getting bad to worse, i choose not to have kids to avoid problems like that. To cry father cry mother to PAP is as useful as hoping to strike toto. chances are nill.
 
This is my take on the matter.

Living long is a curse, I rather have a short and healthy life than a long and painful one. Death is part of life, deal with it.

I have long given up on the idea of retirement in Singapore. Its also funny to think that many who are older and having kids and now worrying about putting their kids through school. After 35, I told myself I wont have kids as I know the shit that will happen to workers at 40. Imagine have kids at 40. For an employee that is the most vulnerable stage of life as companies are out to get you at that age and u have mouths to feed. Its like fighting a multi front war.

My plan is when my time comes, to retire in a cheaper country like Indon, or pinoyland. with 300K sing in the bank and spending wisely,,I can retire for a long time there. the trick is not to be too ambitious and greedy. Live with what you have and plan accordingly.

For those at the 'vulnerable' stage i have mentioned, too bad for u, u made your bed and u choose to have kids etc. U deal with the situation. Life in Singapore is getting bad to worse, i choose not to have kids to avoid problems like that. To cry father cry mother to PAP is as useful as hoping to strike toto. chances are nill.

It is a curse and a sin to be old in Singapore under the corrupt PAP Govt.
Yes,as a Singapore Employee,u are at the absolute mercy of the Singapore Employers who can retrench any Singapore Employee anytime and anywhere,
not forgetting that the PAP Govt and NTUC also supported the Singapore Employers in victimising,bullying and exploiting the Singapore Employees.
The fact is Singapore Employees are slaves in their own homeland ruled by the corrupt and elitist PAP.
 
For those at the 'vulnerable' stage i have mentioned, too bad for u, u made your bed and u choose to have kids etc. U deal with the situation. Life in Singapore is getting bad to worse, i choose not to have kids to avoid problems like that. To cry father cry mother to PAP is as useful as hoping to strike toto. chances are nill.


Even for those who are currently living the Spore dream, life for their children may not be so cozy. Especially when their children will have to compete for breathing space in Spore.
 
Even for those who are currently living the Spore dream, life for their children may not be so cozy. Especially when their children will have to compete for breathing space in Spore.

The facts are : Singapore is NOT a country,Singapore is NOT a nation.
Singapore is now a Corporation,Singapore is a Hotel.
I once farked an old MIW supporter at a coffeeshop who is mumbling that everything now is expensive and he said LKY is brilliant.I retorted and lambasted him that LKY is just an opportunistic bastard who don't know how to debate,only know how to threaten his opponents and sell out his comrades to attain his political ambitions.I retorted that if selfish and ballsless Singaporeans got no balls to mark X to vote for the Opposition ,then don't come here to grumble,U Deserve it !!!He kept quiet and kept his head down.KNNCCB to the 60 % who voted for the PAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D
 
The facts are : Singapore is NOT a country,Singapore is NOT a nation.
Singapore is now a Corporation,Singapore is a Hotel.
I once farked an old MIW supporter at a coffeeshop who is mumbling that everything now is expensive and he said LKY is brilliant.I retorted and lambasted him that LKY is just an opportunistic bastard who don't know how to debate,only know how to threaten his opponents and sell out his comrades to attain his political ambitions.I retorted that if selfish and ballsless Singaporeans got no balls to mark X to vote for the Opposition ,then don't come here to grumble,U Deserve it !!!He kept quiet and kept his head down.KNNCCB to the 60 % who voted for the PAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

Sinkies are the 4th class citizens in a land stolen from them by smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY and his maggots in white.
FTs brought in to be the 3rd class citizens
Maggots in white and their kangaroos and running dogs the 2nd class
LKY relied on them and civil serpents to screw and fuck sinkies of 700 to 800++ billions into LKY Stinkapore sovereign funds

Sinkies were fucking fools to have voted and voted for LKY again and again
 
“The standard of living has improved, but the cost of living, we’re feeling the pinch,” said Mui, who’s made S$4,000 ($3,240) in the past six months as a part-time taxi driver, compared with S$12,000 a month at digital-storage device company SM Summit Holdings Ltd. before a corporate takeover put him out of a job.

Any idea Mui said he made S$4000 ($3240) ..he made 4k or 3240 ? Why is there 2 figure ???
 
Any idea Mui said he made S$4000 ($3240) ..he made 4k or 3240 ? Why is there 2 figure ???

US dollar I believe. This report is for the international scene. Notice it came from Bloomberg?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top