- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,017
- Points
- 48
Recently I was having lunch with a good friend of mine. As the topic of conversation veered towards politics, we talked about the recent 6.9 million White Paper.
A staunch PAP supporter, my friend argued passionately that the problem that the PAP was having is mainly communication. He was of the view that most Singaporeans do not understand the policy issues behind immigration. As such, they were therefore so opposed to the policy to bring in so many immigrants. Given that the problem was communication, his solution was that the PAP needs to desperately improve its communication efforts. This applied to not only the FT policy but to also other policies as well. If the PAP could do this, then they could win back the ground.
My view was that it was not a communication problem. Instead of not understanding the issues, the problem is that the issues are now too well understood by Singaporeans. This understanding occurred because of the political awakening that started in GE 2011. Things have gotten to the stage where even secondary school children can ask the Minister sensitive “mature” questions. Because of the understanding of how PAP policies are negatively affecting them, no amount of “improved communications” is going to stop the erosion of support.
Which do you think is the correct answer? If it is a communication problem, then the problem is solvable and the PAP could reverse their fortunes. If however the problem is because the issues are now well understood by too many Singaporeans, then the outcomes for 2015 and 2021 seem fixed beyond redemption.
A staunch PAP supporter, my friend argued passionately that the problem that the PAP was having is mainly communication. He was of the view that most Singaporeans do not understand the policy issues behind immigration. As such, they were therefore so opposed to the policy to bring in so many immigrants. Given that the problem was communication, his solution was that the PAP needs to desperately improve its communication efforts. This applied to not only the FT policy but to also other policies as well. If the PAP could do this, then they could win back the ground.
My view was that it was not a communication problem. Instead of not understanding the issues, the problem is that the issues are now too well understood by Singaporeans. This understanding occurred because of the political awakening that started in GE 2011. Things have gotten to the stage where even secondary school children can ask the Minister sensitive “mature” questions. Because of the understanding of how PAP policies are negatively affecting them, no amount of “improved communications” is going to stop the erosion of support.
Which do you think is the correct answer? If it is a communication problem, then the problem is solvable and the PAP could reverse their fortunes. If however the problem is because the issues are now well understood by too many Singaporeans, then the outcomes for 2015 and 2021 seem fixed beyond redemption.