• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Rumpole to be convicted at the way that he is conducting his case

cheekenpie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro, nothing to do with age old practice of lecturers screwing their students.

I was told that his guy had been doing this to other students, and has been receiving all kind of gifts from students. He in turn has not given anything in return. Imagine telling a blatant lie to the court about his suspension.

This is not your usual sex case.

If this is true..... the students never receive gratification wor.
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
As the saying goes - he who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.

Scroobal, whoever you are, if you have information on who this Rumpole Fatso is, please PM me. A place in IMH has been reserved for him.

Totally agree with you on the folly of conducting your own trial. Objectivity is lost because it’s your life on the line. Doctors should not operate on themselves, lawyers should not conduct their own trials, but it is perfectly fine for accountants to cook their own books!

While not actually saying out loud that Rumpole of Sammyboy is Tey, you have used it in the headlines, which should read “Tey to be convicted at the way he is conducting his case”. This use of Jedi style mind tricks reminds me of the Shit, oops I mean, Straits Times. Please don’t lower yourself to this level, intentionally or otherwise. Discerning netizens might find cause to suspect you to be IB when you may not be.

This passage from the “Crumbling of Singapore” thread hits the nail on its head and is worth quoting.

No. I found that comment that Rumpole = Prof Tey intriguing but I don't know whether it's true.
One reason why I think it might be true because Rumpole writes in a highfalutin way that you might expect of a professor.
One reason why I think it might not be true is that I can't imagine that a person with a knife over his head and being watched like a hawk would do something incredibly reckless like that.

There are literally thousands upon thousands of people who can write in Rumpole’s highfalutin manner. Lawyers are trained to write in this way. That makes all 3,000 or so of those registered with the Law Society suspects based on this factor alone!

Also, I find this quote from another thread intriguing.

There was no temple dispute. Subhas was indeed the head of the Black Eagles and the gang's weapon was held in temple premises which was common practice amongst triads as the authorities are loathe to raid such places.

Should Subhas file a defamation suit, will you be able to prove on the balance of probabilities that he was “indeed the head of the Black Eagles”, a gang?

Due to incompetence of IBs like Rodyk, who I note has not been active since 12th Dec 2012, a few days after this disastrous exchange on another thread, my job of ferreting out this Rumpole Fatso is becoming more and more difficult.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?136558-Incident-with-a-Santa&p=1320217#post1320217

$50,000 may look like small change IF you do not take into account financial commitments – mortgage, car loans, children’s education, etc. To say that one is “suspended” is different from saying that one is “not paid”. Hence, there may have been no lie, just misreporting aka Jedi mind trick. For sure, “suspended” means your job is not as secure as before i.e. you better reserve the $50,000 for a rainy day, unless it is absolutely necessary to spend it.

Like I say, PM me if you have any insider information and in the meantime, it’s worth remembering that Tey is going to prison and Rumpole to IMH. Different strokes for different people!

Cheers and I enjoy your threads on the ongoing BE, though I will vote for the PAP come what may, for the same reasons as the Son of Punggol.

Am pretty sure the other PAP IBs will zap me into oblivion in the middle of the night when nobody’s watching, so Ciao Amigo!
 

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
how to file defamation suit when one is hiding ?just blow shit that's all
i heard, u heard...etc
 
Last edited:

ray_of_hope

Alfrescian
Loyal
i don't understand why so much publicity and space is given to such a natural affair - and it is filled with sordid and lurid details of the intimacy. it's really unnecessary. it has totally dumbed the people and has divertd the attention from the BE and other more pressing issues. i feel sorry for the readers and for the people....one after another of nothing but explicit and sordid SEXUAL EXPLOITS...


How come the girl is holding up so well despite the fact they also disclose the abortion, which is possibly the worst detail to emerge so far?
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
how to file defamation suit when one is hiding ?just blow shit that's all
i heard, u heard...etc

Shhhhh .... I teach you how to avoid paying damages for defamation even if you are not hiding.

I heard from someone that there is a rumour going round that Subhas may be the head of the Black Eagles vs. Subhas is indeed the head of the Black Eagles.

1st is a statement that there is a rumour whereas 2nd is a statement of fact that so and so is head of a triad gang. Kena sue for making 1st statement, need only prove that there is a rumour. Get your kaki to testify that you talked about this in the coffee shop lor! 2nd statement, you sure lose one.
 
Last edited:

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
either way easy to make sweeping statements when one hides behind a fake name
i heard, i asked around, my sourness tell me..... BS
 
Last edited:

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Anyone heard not long ago there was an official memo from SMU office to students warning about sex with lecturers?
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
either way easy to make sweeping statements when one hides behind a fake name
i heard, i asked around, my sourness tell me..... BS

Absolutely agree with you. That's why I say even if there are good and valid reasons for hiding behind a fake name (ISA, etc), one must exercise self discipline when posting.
 
Last edited:

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Scroobal, whoever you are, if you have information on who this Rumpole Fatso is, please PM me. A place in IMH has been reserved for him.

Totally agree with you on the folly of conducting your own trial. Objectivity is lost because it’s your life on the line. Doctors should not operate on themselves, lawyers should not conduct their own trials, but it is perfectly fine for accountants to cook their own books!

While not actually saying out loud that Rumpole of Sammyboy is Tey, you have used it in the headlines, which should read “Tey to be convicted at the way he is conducting his case”. This use of Jedi style mind tricks reminds me of the Shit, oops I mean, Straits Times. Please don’t lower yourself to this level, intentionally or otherwise. Discerning netizens might find cause to suspect you to be IB when you may not be.

This passage from the “Crumbling of Singapore” thread hits the nail on its head and is worth quoting.



There are literally thousands upon thousands of people who can write in Rumpole’s highfalutin manner. Lawyers are trained to write in this way. That makes all 3,000 or so of those registered with the Law Society suspects based on this factor alone!

Also, I find this quote from another thread intriguing.



Should Subhas file a defamation suit, will you be able to prove on the balance of probabilities that he was “indeed the head of the Black Eagles”, a gang?

Due to incompetence of IBs like Rodyk, who I note has not been active since 12th Dec 2012, a few days after this disastrous exchange on another thread, my job of ferreting out this Rumpole Fatso is becoming more and more difficult.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?136558-Incident-with-a-Santa&p=1320217#post1320217

$50,000 may look like small change IF you do not take into account financial commitments – mortgage, car loans, children’s education, etc. To say that one is “suspended” is different from saying that one is “not paid”. Hence, there may have been no lie, just misreporting aka Jedi mind trick. For sure, “suspended” means your job is not as secure as before i.e. you better reserve the $50,000 for a rainy day, unless it is absolutely necessary to spend it.

Like I say, PM me if you have any insider information and in the meantime, it’s worth remembering that Tey is going to prison and Rumpole to IMH. Different strokes for different people!

Cheers and I enjoy your threads on the ongoing BE, though I will vote for the PAP come what may, for the same reasons as the Son of Punggol.

Am pretty sure the other PAP IBs will zap me into oblivion in the middle of the night when nobody’s watching, so Ciao Amigo!

If Tey is convicted, the trial judge will be the laughing stock of the judicial world!
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wendy

Please don't contaminate this thread. You are no different to Rumpole where deceit is concerned. Like Rumpole, you got caught lying and in your case about your homeless / financial status.

Credit to Rumpole though for not trying to bring out the name out his father to elicit sympathy or use charity to milk the gullible here.



distraction, and people in forums like this claiming they heard / know this and they heard that - gods they are


and doesn't everyone love a good old sex scandal like watching a soap opera on tv
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
This guy to too clever by half. First trying to use the net to fight his case with multiple handles. Attempting to carve out an image of a legal rights champion who is being persecuted by the authorities for his legal penmanship. Using his native country to support his cause with content of a similar style emerging from that side of the border. And it goes on and pn including his court conduct such as going thru 44 paragraphs etc.

Again too clever by half by targeting the competitive students, telling them their ranking etc.

I understand that he comes from a well to do family so it strikes me as someone who thought he was going to game the system. Only screw around with the competitive ones who are above average so nothing would appear as outliers.





His case is quite weak to begin with, and it may be because his lawyer wants him to PG, but he refused, thus the need to defend himself in court. Gifts that are over the top and unusually expensive, no gift exchange, sex with other students etc. this does not look like any love but purely in exchange for something.

He must be fairly desperate to try to lie to court about no money to pay for forensic tests, hoping that no one will know that he gets paid while on suspension. Which judge will believe that a commercial lawyer doesn't even have at least $50k credit limit on any credit line? His salary is $15k for crying out loud.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is quite usual for tertiary institutions. Not only to protect the students but also the staff who think they are in puppy love and also the system where genuine systems are not unfairly penalised. Very difficult to enforce.



Anyone heard not long ago there was an official memo from SMU office to students warning about sex with lecturers?
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
You need to calm down and not get overly excited.

People do silly things all the time. Take Wendy for instance. She thought using her real name means instant and continuing credibility and the rest of us have little or no credibility. Now discredited and still holding on to that straw. Rumpole is no different with persecution and martyrdom angle.

People are interested if its the gifts, the sex, the power over them or the notion that he could game the system as the main motivator. I suspect the last.



Scroobal, whoever you are, if you have information on who this Rumpole Fatso is, please PM me. A place in IMH has been reserved for him.

While not actually saying out loud that Rumpole of Sammyboy is Tey, you have used it in the headlines, which should read “Tey to be convicted at the way he is conducting his case”. This use of Jedi style mind tricks reminds me of the Shit, oops I mean, Straits Times. Please don’t lower yourself to this level, intentionally or otherwise. Discerning netizens might find cause to suspect you to be IB when you may not be.

Am pretty sure the other PAP IBs will zap me into oblivion in the middle of the night when nobody’s watching, so Ciao Amigo!
 
Top