- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 90,198
- Points
- 113
You may disagree but talent is overrated. Nurture over nature.![]()
These are supposed to be some of SG's greatest talents:

-- Lim Swee Say
-- Chan Chun Sing
-- Teo Ser Luck
No, I agree.
You may disagree but talent is overrated. Nurture over nature.![]()
These are the Ah Tiongs that will NEVER come to Singapore.
I've met many brilliant Chinese and beyond nationality pride and identity, they think Singapore is a dump for those that cannot make it in China; and our desperate crave for them makes Singapore disgusting.
These are the Ah Tiongs that will NEVER come to Singapore.
I've met many brilliant Chinese and beyond nationality pride and identity, they think Singapore is a dump for those that cannot make it in China; and our desperate crave for them makes Singapore disgusting.
These are supposed to be some of SG's greatest talents:
-- Lim Swee Say
-- Chan Chun Sing
-- Teo Ser Luck
No, I agree.
Strategy yes but it's still about pattern recognition and synthesis to apply the right strategy instinctively. Am I right to say that?
Definitely, pattern recognition and strategic thinking are crucial to games like chess and Weiqi, as well as a good memory for moves, openings, endgames and lessons learnt from past mistakes.
Question is, how much nurture and how much nature account for a top player's powers of pattern recognition, mathematical-logical cognitive ability, and memory? Given enough effort, most can play these games decently. But to be a champion, a great player? I think you definitely need innate talent, in addition to lots of hard work to be a top pro player.
You don't need to be talented to become a politician. Don't be misled by the MSM.![]()
Really? the ping pong imports beat them and so did Tao Li.
Weiqi (go in Japanese, baduk in Korean) is a very interesting game.
For other chess games e.g. Chinese chess and International chess, you can quite easily figure out who's going to win and who's going to lose at the early-mid stage when you see a series of bad moves, one player losing some powerful pieces etc.
In weiqi, you won't know who's the winner until the final stages. A seemingly dominant player in the early stages of the game can succumb to a late comeback from the opponent. It's like sudden death in football.
Not true.. every year Singapore recruits all the top students from various provinces and give them scholarship and bond them after graduate.
Go Beijing and talk to the Qing Hua top graduates. I'll be there next week and I'll introduce you what Top Students really meant in China. These are the ones that have a choice of Ivy League Universities to choose from. Another reason why Singapore looks for students in remote provinces when they are young is because they cannot attract the older ones.
Lastly, Singapore gives them scholarships not because they are smart but because they are poor. The ultimate intention is to have them stay in Singapore. Why do you think we want Chinese who cannot speak basic English, throw shit loads of money and free tuition to them when these resources can be spent on locals to groom them?
Talent is overrated. Chess at the highest level is all about pattern recognition.![]()
Really? the ping pong imports beat them and so did Tao Li.