NSP's faux pas: Power struggle, leadership split or no Leadership at all ?

[brocoli]

who is the real NSP CHief? Nicole or Hazel or Sebastian ?

Ok, I think its very telling that we have a statement from NSP and no1 1 sign it off...

usually it will be sign on like this

Hazel Poa
Secretary-General

On behalf of the Central Executive Committee

and usually Nicole being a bimbo will just blindly copy and paste any statement on her Facebook.. since she has not much view of her own... she is really no diff from baey, a marketing himbo....

notably, nicole didnot paste this statement on her own FB wall[/SIZE]...

1stly, Hazel dun rule out...

2ndly, Nicole contradict her saying

Anyone else who does so is not taking into consideration the work of Worker's Party MP ...

lastly, whoever issue the statement contradict saying

Transparency in war is suicidal. Political situations are always fluid and pre-mature announcements carry unnecessary risks. ...

this statement while trying to refute GMS actually implied that Nicole is not politically savvy or mature and taking on unnessary risk...

if you read between the lines. she is telling GMS that she3 wun allow herself to be drag through the m&d and no1 can just make use of her ...

but indirectly the message to NSP leadership be it hazel or sebas...

"I dun care what your feud with WP is.. ? and I dun care what your game is ..I am going to save myself rather than present a united front with the Party..."

the standard reply by WP or PAP would be "I would leave it to the party... or the party haven made a definitive statement... or the Party have not discuss yet ... or PM havent even set a date yet why you so kan chiong, you guys very free is it??

but there was no effort to disfuse this shit which GMS has stir up.... instead she stir up a bigger shit by condeming Hazel and Jee Say...

and Lastly why do NSP have to imply that Nicole is not politically savvy or mature and taking on unnessary risk... ???

this is so dumb, their media handling is so bad... they should just let Nicole do it... their media handling is even worst than WP silence over Yaw gate...

and what has Nicole done in her youth wing so far.,,., even though I think there is no pt to WP youthquake and monthly quiz.. its styill something NSP youth wing which has 1 inactive leader ?

in the last PE.. NSP was the ultimate joke party with Key members supporting different candidate... showing a distinct lack of leadership and this incident only reinforce it...no matter how bad WP did.. they can always count on NSP to make them look good...

GMS try to stir shit with WP but only end up saboing NSP ...

I am sorry to say this ... NSP will never win a seat in Parliament...

and this is 1st step for NS to bail out of the sinking NSP...

 

[Kinana]

There is a lack of leadership and a clear split in NSP. Made all of them look very bad.

NS made a serious mistake and there are only four options left for her.

1. stay in NSP and hope all this nonsence will be forgotten and forgiven over time.
2. switch party
3. start her own party
4. strike out on her own as an activist.

Which do you think she will choose?

 

[Raiders]

I was wondering, would there be any chance for NS to defect to WP? With her around, WP has a good chance to build a second all star team.

 

[cleareyes]

I was wondering, would there be any chance for NS to defect to WP? With her around, WP has a good chance to build a second all star team.

Dont think NS is willing to start from ground zero again.

 

[brocoli]

Dont think NS is willing to start from ground zero again.

seem like WP doesnt welcome her

 

[breaknews]

Anybody else wants to post a list of MIWs contradictory statements for PAP?

I can't be bothered!

 

[cleareyes]

seem like WP doesnt welcome her

which part of my reply ever mention that WP dont welcome NS?

 

[brocoli]

which part of my reply ever mention that WP dont welcome NS?

I say seem like... did I say explicitly ???

obviously some1 cant read

 

[Ramseth]

Dear forummers, are you politically and linguistically naive or what? There're no words irreversibly contradicting in politics. For example, if NSP really decides to field a a candidate in Hougang BE, it can always say, despite recognizing the works of LTK in Hougang over the past 20 years, 20 years has been a long time and we feel it's time now to offer Hougang another choice, with due respect to LTK and WP, in a fair contest. Let the voters decide, blah blah blah...

This type of language is not only found in politics, but also in law, finance etc. For example, STI fell today because of US DJIA falling overnight, or, the STI fell today despite of DJIA rising overnight, or, STI rosed today because of DJIA rising overnight, or, STI rose today despite of DJIA falling overnight.

 

[Kinana]

Dear forummers, are you politically and linguistically naive or what? There're no words irreversibly contradicting in politics. For example, if NSP really decides to field a a candidate in Hougang BE, it can always say, despite recognizing the works of LTK in Hougang over the past 20 years, 20 years has been a long time and we feel it's time now to offer Hougang another choice, with due respect to LTK and WP, in a fair contest. Let the voters decide, blah blah blah...

This type of language is not only found in politics, but also in law, finance etc. For example, STI fell today because of US DJIA falling overnight, or, the STI fell today despite of DJIA rising overnight, or, STI rosed today because of DJIA rising overnight, or, STI rose today despite of DJIA falling overnight.

So can NS now reverse and contest in Hougang? Sure, why not?

 

[brocoli]

Dear forummers, are you politically and linguistically naive or what? There're no words irreversibly contradicting in politics. For example, if NSP really decides to field a a candidate in Hougang BE, it can always say, despite recognizing the works of LTK in Hougang over the past 20 years, 20 years has been a long time and we feel it's time now to offer Hougang another choice, with due respect to LTK and WP, in a fair contest. Let the voters decide, blah blah blah...

are you saying that NIcole will flip flop ???

anyway this is not bout flip floping.... this is bout fractionalism and a very public contradictory statements by NSP....

and interestingly I believe the statement is by hazel... but whoever wrote ot has no guts to sign off... perhaps trying to pass it of as a united front....

 

[Sadist]

interestingly I believe the statement is by hazel... but whoever wrote ot has no guts to sign off... perhaps trying to pass it of as a united front....

Obviously you have no idea about collectively leadership, it's a party statement, why the need to sign off by anyone?

 

[brocoli]

Obviously you have no idea about collectively leadership, it's a party statement, why the need to sign off by anyone?

so why was previous statement sign off by hazel.... there was no collective leadership then ???

your level of intellect is very low...

 

[Sadist]

so why was previous statement sign off by hazel.... there was no collective leadership then ???

your level of intellect is very low...

You are a waste of my time. No sweets for you.

 

[brocoli]

You are a waste of my time. No sweets for you.

with pathetic response like this.. you only prove that I sunk your arguement...

I notice it so often here.. resorting to personal attack or ah Q arguement to save face...

pathetic