Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?
Which allegation is true under writ of summons filed?
If all allegations were true in writs why waste time and money on Kong Hee & the gang?
Shouldn't MHA respect the law of the country and defend it in court instead of defending it using parliament speech as alibi?
De aunt sir bery sim pearl. No rue off raw in Sinkiepoor. Dey MHA shoot B char sir 4 con temp off cock. Sinkie jugglers god no balls 2 do dat. Just si me avaTAR hahaha.
Ball tom line Sinkies no balls 2 do strit pro test ant no care if knock dey child - COW Walk ant sale FISH
Wiki on sub judice:
In law, sub judice, Latin for "under judgment", means that a particular case or matter is under trial or being considered by a judge or court. The term may be used synonymously with "the present case" or "the case at bar" by some lawyers.
In England and Wales, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, Singapore, etc it is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process.