• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

US Armed Forces grounds its F35 Fleet

SBFNews

Alfrescian
Loyal
US Armed Forces grounds it's F35 Fleet


user posted image


The US Air Force has grounded its fleet of F-35 jets temporarily, citing a potentially faulty component in the ejection seat that could endanger pilots in an emergency, a concern that also grounded other types of military planes that are used in training.

The issue involves the explosive cartridges inside ejection seats that help propel the seat -- and the pilot -- from the plane during an emergency, Alexi Worley, spokeswoman for the Air Force’s Air Combat Command, said in a statement Friday.

The affected aircraft have ejection seats made by Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd., Worley said.

“On July 19, we began a Time Compliance Technical Directive to inspect all of the cartridges on the ejection seat within 90 days,” Worley said in the statement. “Out of an abundance of caution,” she said Air Combat Command units “will execute a stand-down on July 29 to expedite the inspection process. Based on data gathered from those inspections, ACC will make a determination to resume operations.”

It’s the latest development in a concern over planes that have the ejection seats. The Air Force on Thursday decided to ground almost 300 training aircraft over the issue. The Navy and Marine Corps have also sidelined some of their fixed-wing aircraft. The groundings were reported earlier by Breaking Defense and Air Force Times.

Only aircraft equipped with cartridges “within a limited range of lot numbers are affected,” the Navy said in a statement this week. The cartridges will be replaced at the aircraft’s assigned squadron and the aircraft will be inspected before its next flight, the service said.

But Steve Roberts, Martin-Baker’s head of business development, said in an emailed statement that only F-35s were affected.

An “anomaly” was discovered with one of the Seat Cartridge Actuated Devices (CAD) in the F-35 seat in April at Hill Air Force Base, Roberts said, and “this was quickly traced back to a gap in the manufacturing process which was addressed and changed.”

“Outside the F-35, not a single anomaly has been discovered worldwide as a result of the forensic investigation which continues at pace,” Roberts said.

So far, 820 F-35s built by Lockheed Martin Corp. have been delivered worldwide out of a potential 3,000 for the US and partner nations. The Air Force is the largest F-35 customer, with 348 of its planned 1,763 planes now in its inventory.

After years of talks, the Pentagon announced earlier this month that it reached preliminary agreement with Lockheed on the next three-year contract for 375 more of the advanced fighters. That contract could be worth about $30 billion, according to a defense official familiar with the negotiations.

The Government Accountability Office earlier this year said that F-35 readiness rates for the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps have improved since 2019 but still fall short of program goals.
 

maxsanic

Alfrescian
Loyal
Politics aside, it's really a bad idea for the RSAF to be buying F35. This aircraft is trouble from day one: significantly overbudget, under spec, all sorts of operational issues and worst of all the repair and maintenance is an endless money pit.

This whole project is a high tech and multi-national version of Proton cars, i.e. everyone agrees the product is shit but continues to trudge on as the entire supply chain from development to manufacturing to aftersales has morphed into a welfare gravy train.

Even if we choose to pay protection money to US, can't we at least spend the same amount on weapons that are actually relevant and of use to our defense needs?
 

cocobobo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Politics aside, it's really a bad idea for the RSAF to be buying F35. This aircraft is trouble from day one: significantly overbudget, under spec, all sorts of operational issues and worst of all the repair and maintenance is an endless money pit.

This whole project is a high tech and multi-national version of Proton cars, i.e. everyone agrees the product is shit but continues to trudge on as the entire supply chain from development to manufacturing to aftersales has morphed into a welfare gravy train.

Even if we choose to pay protection money to US, can't we at least spend the same amount on weapons that are actually relevant and of use to our defense needs?
Our neighbours are buying boramae kf-21 from SKorea. Cheaper, but not sure better.
 

maxsanic

Alfrescian
Loyal
Our neighbours are buying boramae kf-21 from SKorea. Cheaper, but not sure better.

That's just a 4.5+G aircraft at best without even an internal weapons bay and worse still its at a first prototype stage. Even if everything goes smoothly (very unlikely due to Korea having no real experience and mature competency in advanced subsystems while Indonesia brings nothing to the table except money), it will be at least 2035 time frame before Indonesia can even equip this 4.5+G aircraft in good numbers.

The world is not short of nations purporting to develop 5G aircraft, but so far none of them are even close to getting anything done except for US and China. Russia is equipping a small fleet but of an uncertain future.

We should not be burning truckloads of money over a long term proven faulty aircraft just to defend ourselves against a plane which is unlikely to succeed and even if proven contrary, will only be slightly superior than the existing F15SG.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Politics aside, it's really a bad idea for the RSAF to be buying F35. This aircraft is trouble from day one: significantly overbudget, under spec, all sorts of operational issues and worst of all the repair and maintenance is an endless money pit.

This whole project is a high tech and multi-national version of Proton cars, i.e. everyone agrees the product is shit but continues to trudge on as the entire supply chain from development to manufacturing to aftersales has morphed into a welfare gravy train.

Even if we choose to pay protection money to US, can't we at least spend the same amount on weapons that are actually relevant and of use to our defense needs?
You have to pay homage to your masters or else....
 
Top