• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Tan Wah Piow reaches out to Singaporeans on Iraq War

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The latest article from Tan Wah Piow on Iraq War and Singapore's involvement. I think you get the drift.


http://theindependent.sg/was-goh-ch...when-he-supported-us-led-invasion-of-iraq/Was Goh Chok Tong wearing blinkers when he supported US-led invasion of Iraq?
By The Independent - July 5, 2016 18 2988
Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

By: Tan Wah Piow

In less than 36 hours time, Singaporeans will know whether the man who was paid very much more than President Bush was wearing glasses, or blinkers when he made a major foreign policy statement in 2003 to support the US led invasion of Iraq.

He is Goh Chok Tong, the Prime Minister of Singapore at the time of the Iraq War.

He said: “It is clear to everyone, unless that person wears blinkers, that this is a war to remove the weapons of mass destruction from Saddam Hussein.” He had then offered Singapore support of the military invasion.

After 7 years, the U.K. Chilcot inquiry will release its 12 volume, 2 million words report on the Iraq War. It will be followed by a Debate in UK Parliament on Wednesday,

The Chilcot report is expected to determine whether the British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s belief that Saddam Hussein was holding weapons of mass destruction was backed by evidence. It was based on this claim that Tony Blair ordered military intervention in Iraq.

The report will also determine if Tony Blair had decided to follow George Bush’s military adventure to invade Iraq regardless of evidence, and without UN approval.

If the report points to any potential commission of war crimes, it would have serious implications to Tony Blair. A number of anti-Iraq-war groups are waiting to plough through this report for evidence to commence prosecution against Tony Blair.

For the people in Singapore, they will soon know if their Prime Minister at the time was wearing blinkers, and whether he was aiding and abetting an illegal military venture.

The PAP Government had at the time offered to send personnel to support the US-led coalition troops in Iraq.

There is hardly any debate on this issue in Singapore.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
USA did the right thing in Iraq. We got rid of Saddam, got rid of their WMDs and helped to cull their population. The kurds and shiites should be sucking Bush's hairy cock. If not for Bush, they would still be getting slaughtered by Saddam and his sons still.
 

retardface

Alfrescian
Loyal
USA did the right thing in Iraq. We got rid of Saddam, got rid of their WMDs and helped to cull their population. The kurds and shiites should be sucking Bush's hairy cock. If not for Bush, they would still be getting slaughtered by Saddam and his sons still.

Hey you retardface, its Bush's bushy cock, not his hairy cock.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
at that time they claimed they had overwhelming evidence of weapons of mass destruction,how can overwhelming evidence turn out to be nothing?can british or american intelligence be that bad?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
he should just stop spilling shit about sg just like you should just stop spilling shit about him. both of you are in common.
 
Top