Taking pictures of girls can also be charged?

[eErotica69]

And fuck your mother cheebye. The cheebye you 69 with. Why no sound after zapping and infracting me? You want to take the slack off Alamaking the Sei Hao Hai?

You are a Debonerman a dog and your mother is a f**king old bitch. Your mother's old holes kanna doggie style by all Bangalahs in Geylang. I fucking doggie with your sister and wife, while you and your father kanna doggie by faggots!

You son of a bitch!! Stupid dog!!

 

[Debonerman]

You are a Debonerman a dog and your mother is a f**king old bitch. Your mother's old holes kanna doggie style by all Bangalahs in Geylang. I fucking doggie with your sister and wife, while you and your father kanna doggie by faggots!

You son of a bitch!! Stupid dog!!

Fuck your mother cheebye! Do you lick her clitoris or you prefer to bite her labia? You sick son of whore!....LOL

 

[eErotica69]

Fuck your mother cheebye! Do you lick her clitoris or you prefer to bite her labia? You sick son of whore!....LOL

I prefer your mother's doggie hole!

 

[TheBonerman]

I prefer your mother's doggie hole!

Fucking cheebye with the elongated clitoris pretending to be a man. Fuck your mother cheebye. Banned me for using vulgarities? What a man! Your mother screamed when you 69 her or not? Come infract me. Show the whole world you are a man!.....LOL

 

[eErotica69]

My friend, the moderator and owner of this forum do not prohibit or impose how a thread should be replied or treated. Who are you to tell others what they should and should not do?
Because you have the money to buy power to infract ?

Buddy, that one is not your clone correct? If it is, sorry lah. Banned you. Anyway if it is really you, ceasefire as promised previously. Will not continue.

Let's put thing in the right prespective. who is imposing on who?

Of course from an PAP hater point of view, you think is perfectly normal to for someone to whack PAP in any thread. However, from a neutral point of view, it gets annoying, especially in a totally unrelated thread. Look at this thread, it is about taking pictures of a gals boobs, seriously is it related anything to PAP?

Put in another way, if you are a non-Christian/Buddhist and some Christian/Buddhist extremists start talking about extreme Christian/Buddist theories in every thread, whether religious or not, would you think that is it imposing on you (even though you may be ok with Christianity/Buddhism). Example I start a thread that "My hard disk is spoil" then you get fellows talking about religion, then you tulan or not.

Is also not fair for you to say that just because I have money to buy power, that I abuse infraction. I hardly infraction anyone. In this instance, I didn't ban him yesterday, I only infracted him once. I didn't even scold him and he insulted my mother. Look at his reply. As usual, vulgarities.

Bro, just because he is extremely anti-PAP like you, does not mean that you can practice double standard and think that what he did is correct and I am wrong.

OK we talk nice nice

 

[TheBonerman]

Buddy, that one is not your clone correct? If it is, sorry lah. Banned you. Anyway if it is really you, ceasefire as promised previously. Will not continue.

Let's put thing in the right prespective. who is imposing on who?

Of course from an PAP hater point of view, you think is perfectly normal to for someone to whack PAP in any thread. However, from a neutral point of view, it gets annoying, especially in a totally unrelated thread. Look at this thread, it is about taking pictures of a gals boobs, seriously is it related anything to PAP?

Put in another way, if you are a non-Christian/Buddhist and some Christian/Buddhist extremists start talking about extreme Christian/Buddist theories in every thread, whether religious or not, would you think that is it imposing on you (even though you may be ok with Christianity/Buddhism). Example I start a thread that "My hard disk is spoil" then you get fellows talking about religion, then you tulan or not.

Is also not fair for you to say that just because I have money to buy power, that I abuse infraction. I hardly infraction anyone. In this instance, I didn't ban him yesterday, I only infracted him once. I didn't even scold him and he insulted my mother. Look at his reply. As usual, vulgarities.

Bro, just because he is extremely anti-PAP like you, does not mean that you can practice double standard and think that what he did is correct and I am wrong.

OK we talk nice nice

Hmmmm...nice....how deep did you plunge your tongue into your mother's vagina when you 69 with her? You sick son of an immoral cunt!....LOL

 

[TheBonerman]

I prefer your mother's doggie hole!

Oh dear....Does Lord Dogvader's sperm medicine taste better than your mother's cunt juice when you 69 her? Thank you my Lord Dogvader. I owe you one!.....LOL

 

[makapaaa]

Posted on 10 Sep 2012
Australian man cleared of two charges of molesting female passenger on plane

SOURCE: The Straits Times Online

An Australian national was cleared of two charges of outraging the modesty of a woman passenger on board a plane after he had compounded the matter for $2,000.

Mr Rajput Sandeep Singh, 30, who is in the IT line, made an unequivocal public apology to the 32-year-old woman who was in court on Monday.

He was initially charged with running his fingers from her left to right thigh and back to the left, touching her pubic area twice in the process of doing so.

This happened when he was seated next to her on board a Singapore Airlines flight from New Delhi, India, to Singapore at about 5.30am on Aug 25.

He was also accused of touching her right thigh 10 minutes later.

Under the law, certain criminal offences, such as simple molestation and wrongful restraint, can be settled out of court if the victim agrees to drop the matter in return for some form of compensation.

The offender will not have a criminal record.

 

[makapaaa]

[h=2]Foreigner acquitted while local jailed in seperate molest cases[/h]

January 30th, 2012 |

Author: Editorial

Sierkov Sergii (Photo: ST)

A Ukrainian national received a discharge amounting to an acquittal on Monday (30 Jan), after he paid the victim $10,000 to compound the three molest charges he was facing.
Sales manager Sierkov Sergii, who works in Singapore, allegedly groped a Singapore Airlines stewardess’ buttocks and breasts on three occasions on a flight from Moscow to Singapore in November last year.
The 35-year-old paid the victim $10,000 and gave an open court apology to have his case compounded.
In his apology, Sergii said that he regretted his actions and promised that he would not repeat the offence.
Under Aviation laws, technically the country where the plane is registered and the country of first arrival have jurisdiction over offences committed on the plane while in flight.
Meanwhile, on the same day (30 Jan), a cab driver was sentenced to two weeks jail for molesting his neighbour’s maid in July last year.
Tan Heng Lee, 62, was found guilty of outraging the modesty of the 32-year-old Indonesian maid in a residential unit in Tampines.
Tan went to visit his neighbour and was let into the house by the maid. While she was cooking in the kitchen, Tan approached her and hugged her from behind while touching her breasts over her T-shirt.
The maid later told the employer about the incident and was advised by her employer to make a police report. Tan was then arrested.
In court, Tan, who has no prior convictions, also regretted his actions and said that it meant to “be a joke”.
Tan could have been jailed for up two years, fined, caned or receive any combination of these punishments.

What does having a case compounded mean?
Molestation is a compoundable offence. That is, to settle a charge (without entering a conviction) between the alleged victim and the accused. Once the accused has been charged, such an offence can be compounded with the alleged victim and Court’s consent.
The composition is usually in the form of financial compensation to the victim. However, it can also be in the form of:
(a) a sincere apology to the alleged victim,
(b) an undertaking not to repeat the offending behaviour, or
(c) even the Accused performing a charitable deed such as making a donation to charity.
The Court is likely to grant consent in cases where public interest does not figure strongly. Similarly, where the parties are close to each other, the Court is also likely to grant consent, especially if it was a minor incident.
Where public interest is involved, the Court is likely to be slow to grant consent especially when the Public Prosecutor objects. For instance, it would not be out of order for the Court to withhold consent in cases involving road bully, outrage of modesty and maid abuse. Once the composition is executed, the accused is acquitted from the charge.
Source: http://app.subcourts.gov.sg/Data/Files/File/criminal_faqs_composition.pdf
​

 

[makapaaa]

Briton accused of molest acquitted
By Shaffiq Alkhatib | Posted: 13 September 2011 1330 hrs

SINGAPORE: A 35-year-old British tourist who faced one count of molest in Singapore has been acquitted of the charge in a district court on Tuesday.

Qatar-based recruitment specialist Austin Charles Arnold Cowburn was accused of grabbing a 30-year-old woman's buttock at Clarke Quay's China One Pub on April 3.

Cowburn is now a free man after giving her a compensation of S$5,000.

He also apologised to the woman who sat grim-faced in the gallery with her husband.

Cowburn, who was represented by lawyer, Mr Thangavelu, said that he would like to convey his apologies for any outrage of modesty she suffered as a result of any "inadvertent actions" on his part.

Dressed in a pinstripe suit, the Briton looked relieved when District Judge Francis Remedios acquitted him and was seen thanking his lawyer profusely for his help.

Cowburn was also all smiles when he shook hands with Deputy Public Prosecutor Winston Man.

He could have been jailed up to two years and fined or caned if he had been convicted of molest.

- CNA/fa

 

[makapaaa]

Expat acquitted of molest: Now I'm scared to be alone with women


<!-- BEGIN EFFECTIVE MEASURE CODE --><!-- COPYRIGHT EFFECTIVE MEASURE --><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><!--END EFFECTIVE MEASURE CODE -->


<!-- /block -->November 5, 2012 - 12:00am
<IFRAME style="BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; WIDTH: 550px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; HEIGHT: 40px; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; OVERFLOW: hidden" src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tnp.sg%2Fcontent%2Fexpat-acquitted-molest-now-im-scared-be-alone-women&layout=standard&show_faces=true&width=550&font=arial&height=40&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&send=false" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>
By:

Rennie Whang

TNP PHOTO: Gavin Foo
A handshake with a female colleague that went wrong led to Australian Paul Joseph Smith, 55, being accused of molest last September.
After a four-day trial in April and May this year, the IT project manager was convicted and ordered to be jailed for 18 weeks.
He appealed and was acquitted on Oct 25.
Now, he says, he is very careful around women. For example, if he is alone in a lift and a woman enters, he will leave.
The incident also cost him his job.

 

[makapaaa]

Singapore News <TBODY> </TBODY> <TBODY> </TBODY>

<TBODY>
</TBODY>

Australian man cleared of molestation charge after public apology By Claire Huang | Posted: 23 January 2013 1559 hrs Click to enlarge Photos 1 of 1 <INPUT id=btnPrev disabled value="<< Previous" src="/images/butt_previous.gif" width=18 height=15 type=image> <INPUT id=bntPlay value="Play - Stop" src="/images/butt_stop.gif" width=19 height=15 type=image> <INPUT id=btnNext disabled value=" Next >> " src="/images/butt_next.gif" width=18 height=15 type=image> <TBODY> </TBODY> <TBODY> </TBODY> <!-- for social media sharing functions --> <IFRAME style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 112px; HEIGHT: 20px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" id=f2f26d2630f2ef6 class=fb_ltr title="Like this content on Facebook." src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=101910072318&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&ref=.UQLF6shECKo.like&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D18%23cb%3Dfce9b36f3359a3%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%252Ff14dd99d037dba6%26domain%3Dwww.channelnewsasia.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1249686%2F1%2F.html&node_type=1&width=130&font=arial&layout=button_count&colorscheme=light&action=recommend&show_faces=false&send=false&extended_social_context=false" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency name=fcf93d070577fb scrolling=no></IFRAME> <IFRAME style="WIDTH: 115px; HEIGHT: 20px" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1359077775.html#_=1359136236657&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1249686%2F1%2F.html&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1249686%2F1%2F.html&size=m&text=Australian%20man%20cleared%20of%20molestation%20charge%20after%20public%20apology%20-%20Channel%20NewsAsia%3A&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1249686%2F1%2F.html%23.UQLF6loGZsA.twitter" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no data-twttr-rendered="true"></IFRAME> inShare0​ [URL="http://www.sammyboy.com/#"]6[/URL] <TBODY> </TBODY> <!-- END social media sharing functions --> SINGAPORE: An Australian man has been cleared of a charge of molesting a purchasing officer. This came after Mr Kevin Francis D'arcy, 59, made a public apology in a local English daily on January 19 as requested by the woman. The incident happened on August 31, 2012 in Boat Quay. Mr D'arcy apparently squeezed the buttock of the 32-year-old woman, who was clubbing with her sister and friend. -CNA/ac

<TBODY>
</TBODY>

 

[tyudm]

Buddy, that one is not your clone correct? If it is, sorry lah. Banned you. Anyway if it is really you, ceasefire as promised previously. Will not continue.

Who do you think you are? First you accused me of a clone and if I were you gonna ban me and with the same breath you wanna a truce like before. You are calling the shot here? Fuck you!

Let's put thing in the right prespective. who is imposing on who?

The comment by Bone in its right perspective did not impose on anyone, it was just a disturbance or perhaps a troll and you took it upon yourself as imposing on you, dickhead!

Of course from an PAP hater point of view, you think is perfectly normal to for someone to whack PAP in any thread. However, from a neutral point of view, it gets annoying, especially in a totally unrelated thread. Look at this thread, it is about taking pictures of a gals boobs, seriously is it related anything to PAP?

Like I said before, there is a moderator in this forum and the owner is not dead. Do you know many threads elsewhere deemed unrelated were moved to the Rubbish folder now known as Trivia? Who give you the rights to judge?

Put in another way, if you are a non-Christian/Buddhist and some Christian/Buddhist extremists start talking about extreme Christian/Buddist theories in every thread, whether religious or not, would you think that is it imposing on you (even though you may be ok with Christianity/Buddhism). Example I start a thread that "My hard disk is spoil" then you get fellows talking about religion, then you tulan or not.
Do you think you are the only one here having this problem?

Is also not fair for you to say that just because I have money to buy power, that I abuse infraction. I hardly infraction anyone. In this instance, I didn't ban him yesterday, I only infracted him once. I didn't even scold him and he insulted my mother. Look at his reply. As usual, vulgarities.

You are a resolute liar! You infracted me more than 12 times and an outright ban and I am beginning to see how you squeezed those lies through your teeth. You are beginning to sound like a disciplinary master. Maybe the boss should install one make you the chief here beside the moderator.

Bro, just because he is extremely anti-PAP like you, does not mean that you can practice double standard and think that what he did is correct and I am wrong.

I fuck you, what double standard have I displayed? I am not here to judge or deliver justice to anyone. I am here soley for one purpose, to fuck the PAP and it is none of your concern whether it is right or wrong, relevant or not.

OK we talk nice nice

If you think there is a lack of discipline or conduct here, please ask Sam to insert you a discipline master.

 

[MB55LOT5]

The Or chee got no money call chicken? Sia suay lang