• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sunny Ang murder case and CPF Life

phouse3

Alfrescian
Loyal
Year: 2013 (deaths)
Ages
1-49 9.6%
50-59 11.7%
60-69 17.6%
70 and over 61.1%

Bequest at 65:
CPF Life Standard: $196,883 - $202,037
CPF Life Basic: $232,078 - $243,232

Bequest at 75:
CPF Life Standard: $51,570 - $59,078
CPF Life Basic: $179,550 - $180,536

Bequest at 85:
CPF Life Standard: zero
CPF Life Basic: $82,066 - $85,931

* The amount of bequest is so fantastic that one wonders if CPF Life is really providing for retirement income. For many people, even before they could start to smell their CPF money at 65, the payout is already $243,232 (max.) to their beneficiaries. It reminds me of the Sunny Ang murder case.
* Assuming year 2013 is representative, 29.3% die before 70. There are 1 million people who are disadvantaged by longevity insurance.
* We should be allowing people to opt out of bequest and receive payment starting at 60. All the criticism about low returns, $1,200 p.m. (which is already a princely sum for low income people) not enough, withholding of CPF money would be addressed.
* A retiree with monetised savings in the bank instead of paper profits need not go see her MP on related issues like healthcare costs. A retiree doesn't have to wait until she falls sick, faces a huge medical bill, and then requires other people's help to monetise her flat. The MP, medical social worker, and HDB will save a lot of time. But retirees must be at an age healthy enough and at a psychology level strong enough to relocate, especially to non-mature estates.
* The psychology of windfall gain. A young person receiving an inheritance will not hesitate to spend it at one go, say on a car. A non-working old couple sitting on their savings are unlikely to squander them. Anyway, CPF money is retirement money, not an estate.
 

NoOnEsAwMe

Alfrescian
Loyal
i'm not interested in all the tweaks here and there that can or may be done.

just keep it simple.

return the monies to their rightful owners as and when desired, then i think the people's trust can be regained somewhat.

Otherwise, there is no confidence at all in whatever justifications or proposals or tweaks , etc.

Keyword is confidence.

Don't avoid the issue.

Call a spade a spade pls.
 

phouse3

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP says First World Country; WP says First World Parliament, SDP/NSP/RP says First World Society (where people are free to manage their own CPF money).

The PAP CEC has been repeating for the past 10 years: "We will take care of the old" ; "We will engage the young". Meanwhile, the missing link has grown from one-third to 40%.

While waiting, life must go on, and the missing link must continue shouting for attention.
 
Last edited:
Top