• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SMRT CEO: We are accountable to shareholders

monkey001

Alfrescian
Loyal
SMRT = Singapore Mass Rapid Transit.. correct?
A national transport.. public transport... public not means owned by government? Owned by shareholders?
Someone can explain to me how a public transport can haf shareholders?

something's not rite!!

Wait till you read about singapore national dental centre. A young man thought that the word "The National" meant "the people's" but he was dead wrong. It is all about profit too using the country resource to make more and more money for the famiLees.
 

Tension68

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wait till you read about singapore national dental centre. A young man thought that the word "The National" meant "the people's" but he was dead wrong. It is all about profit too using the country resource to make more and more money for the famiLees.

... this is seriously wrong.. Wrong I tell you!!
 

monkey001

Alfrescian
Loyal
monkey

What fuck shareholder when the trains are bought using taxpayer money?

they should have named a station to commemorate this.

gongjiaoway.jpg
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Only accountable to shareholders? Not accountable to passengers who are the paying customers?
 

Tension68

Alfrescian
Loyal
Only accountable to shareholders? Not accountable to passengers who are the paying customers?

Because "they" believe that Sinkies will nvr stop using MRT or public buses.
Maybe we shud haf one day no bus n mrt day.. see how much money they lose
 
Last edited:

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
Because "they" believe that Sinkies will nvr stop using MRT or public buses.
Maybe we shud haf one day no bus n mrt day.. see how much money they lose

Demand is inelastic. Sinkies will put up with any fare increase as long as they can continue to ride on their "first world" MRT and SBS. Majulah PAP! :biggrin:
 

Conqueror

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hello Kitty Gun

Demand is inelastic. Sinkies will put up with any fare increase as long as they can continue to ride on their "first world" MRT and SBS. Majulah PAP! :biggrin:


One supplier = monopoly or few suppliers = oligopoly.

In Sinkiesland, this is a sad case. We cannot say no to anyone but LL and give money to brigands up there. And yet, we get poor service - lousy connection, slow download speed, mrt breakdowns, etc.
 

ionzu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Only accountable to shareholders? Not accountable to passengers who are the paying customers?

nope, just like how PAP is only accountable to citizens and not tourist. same for MRT, passengers = "tourists" while the shareholders are "citizens"

right wing politics of smaller government gone wrong. obama should take a firmer stance against right wing banana republics.
 
Top