virus have intelligence? what's their IQ level like? quit anthropomorphising the virus, we can't even tell if it is dead or alive. mutation is random. scientists find it hard to target and kill viruses because the frequency for mutation is considerably high.
Overtime, not only the drugs became useless, the virus become stronger to a point the drug-therapy is useless to contain it.
Viruses have designs.
me agree, many different types of design.
98% Junk? How do you know? The fact that only 2% have been discovered to be useful doesn't mean that all the 98% are useless. Science is just simply not advance enough - now - to identify the function of the other 98%.
I am reading you claim with, no a pinch, but a ton of salt - only 2% are useful? OK, granted only 2%, who created those 2% and in absolute number, how many are these? Any biologist will tell you that DNA is a very advanced instructional language.
These designs can outsmart scientists?
that would come under immunology, once the surface protein code of the virus is recognised, that virus may be eradicated. but most of the time, the mutation happens at such high frequency, the doctors have a hard time isolating the right virus.
talk about this, if i am not wrong there is a case where AIDS was cured via bone marrow transferred. this was i think published in either science or nature. i know currently after that incident, many are targetting that direction, i expect some good news on it in the next 20 years.
from what i recalled, HIV virus was not in him anymore, he was no longer a carrier. i go check again, as you are a biologist, i trust you more on this matter. LOL
you could be actually right, the man received the transplant in 07, that was when me first read it, apparently me had not been following up on this, my bad :(:(:(
but only one successful case reported so far? and couple that with the probability of matching a suitable donor to a receipient... odds are stacked :o:o:o
as always, one liner...
never passed your secondary school composition of > 500 words?
where's psalm23 when we need him? at least he put in alot of effort in writing out his bullshit.
View attachment 4711
like a virus, immobile on its own, unable to self replicate, no biochemical reactions possible. once in a host, the virus is capable of transforming itself, start replicating and being mobile. is it dead or alive?
having a second read, the notion of using a PC as an analogy isn't quite sound, likewise for any other man made objects. these objects are intricate in design but they aren't alive and certainly ain't self replicating. in essence, they are simply man made, what gives even when they had the most complex designs? these objects ain't a living organism.
for a start, is a virus dead or alive?