• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Sg] - Couple loses S$50,000 for breaking up after getting executive condo

UltimaOnline

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE — Picture this: you are young and in love with your partner. You decide to commit to building a life together by buying a home.

After all, land is scarce, property prices can appreciate rapidly, and wait times for completion take years. Securing a Housing and Development Board (HDB) Build-To-Order (BTO) flat or Executive Condo (EC) unit early seems like the smart thing to do.

But not all relationships end with a "happily ever after", and in Singapore, breaking up can have serious financial consequences – especially when a joint application has been made for a public housing flat.

Such was the case for Jane Chang, who requested for her name to be changed, and her then-partner, whose break-up cost them a whopping S$50,000. The couple had been dating for 18 months before deciding to apply for an EC under the fiance/fiancee scheme. Securing a public housing unit under this scheme implies that a marriage proposal would come at some point before collecting the keys, as being legally married is a condition for eligibility.

Like many young Singaporean couples, the plan for them was to secure a flat and then get married before the completion of the unit, which was expected in four to five years. The couple also wanted to seize the opportunity to invest in what they thought was "a good, profitable buy" at the time, after considering the unit's pricing and the unit's location in Canberra.

At the time of application, Chang was 24 years old, and her ex-boyfriend was 26. Six months after signing the sales and purchase agreement, the relationship was over.

Speaking to Yahoo Finance Singapore, Chang said, "You think you know it all at that age, but actually you don't."


https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/c...-after-getting-executive-condo-072639682.html
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Definitely the loser boy proposed:
"Do you want to apply for a bto?"
Instead of
"Will you marry me?"

BTO = Bonk Till Orgasm.

I noticed HDB has been quite aggressive in its ads recently, quite unusual for public housing. I saw also the very cringe 'BTOgether' on its ad posters. :o-o:
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don understand, just get hdb, the cheapest, sinkies dumb to pay high rental for flats they Don owned n also will depreciate
 

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Instead of paying half-half, I actually paid more because I started working earlier. I think a lot of insecurities came up on his end," said Chang.

NS is the cause of it.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
After paying for the flat, no more money to fool around.
Singkie girlfriend wanted the quality life style she is used to. Complain and harassed the bf.
Galfriend went off and fuck other Man.
 

SBFNews

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE — Picture this: you are young and in love with your partner. You decide to commit to building a life together by buying a home.

After all, land is scarce, property prices can appreciate rapidly, and wait times for completion take years. Securing a Housing and Development Board (HDB) Build-To-Order (BTO) flat or Executive Condo (EC) unit early seems like the smart thing to do.

But not all relationships end with a "happily ever after", and in Singapore, breaking up can have serious financial consequences – especially when a joint application has been made for a public housing flat.

Such was the case for Jane Chang, who requested for her name to be changed, and her then-partner, whose break-up cost them a whopping S$50,000. The couple had been dating for 18 months before deciding to apply for an EC under the fiance/fiancee scheme. Securing a public housing unit under this scheme implies that a marriage proposal would come at some point before collecting the keys, as being legally married is a condition for eligibility.

Like many young Singaporean couples, the plan for them was to secure a flat and then get married before the completion of the unit, which was expected in four to five years. The couple also wanted to seize the opportunity to invest in what they thought was "a good, profitable buy" at the time, after considering the unit's pricing and the unit's location in Canberra.

At the time of application, Chang was 24 years old, and her ex-boyfriend was 26. Six months after signing the sales and purchase agreement, the relationship was over.

Speaking to Yahoo Finance Singapore, Chang said, "You think you know it all at that age, but actually you don't."


https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/c...-after-getting-executive-condo-072639682.html
They should have use GSB method. Get married, collect keys, then annul marriage based on fake non consummation declaring virginity, then sell and make profit. :biggrin:
 

searcher1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Well... that is the risk of tasting young pussy. Men are going after MILF Cougar
They fuck well & dont mind Men stay in their places, just bring the sausage
 
Top