-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
[Sg] - Bilahari Kausikan speaks : 'If a big war in the Middle East comes, it'll be over Iran not Palestine'
- Thread starter UltimaOnline
- Start date
Gosh. He speaks as if he is the only one that knows it all in SG.
Let's break it down.
Israel already owns West Bank. Heck they own america and Europe too! Now they want the Gaza sans it's subhumans (Zionists lexicon).
But the bigger prize is Iran which they've been egging Amerika to attack and finish off. So if Bibi didn't get Iran, they at least get Gaza and get the Greater Israel project going.
Hamas wanted to put a spanner in MBS plans to normalize with the zionists.
US knows that it is attached at the hip to Israel and will have to help them no matter what. But they do not want to go up against Iran because they'll lose their nose and ears. And possibly Russia will enter the fray because Russia cannot afford Iran losing or else they will lose everything in the middle east.
Iran did not want this incident because they were not fully ready to teach Israel it's lessons. Their weapons setup in Syria is not completed yet.
So Bilahari being the useless analyst uses the conditional 'if'. Because well he is useless and cannot predict accurately.
War between Amerika and Iran isn't happening. Not for the next 1 year at least. Iran is not taking the bait.
Try harder Kausikan.
Iran is in a proxy war with Israel.
We all know that Iran supplies Herzbollah and Hamas with weapons and the knowhow they need to try and destroy Israel.
What else is new?
Even Turkiye has a role in the conflict.
We all know that Iran supplies Herzbollah and Hamas with weapons and the knowhow they need to try and destroy Israel.
What else is new?
Even Turkiye has a role in the conflict.
I thought he fart louder than he speaks, can be verified by LWL
Nobody in the middle East wants to deal with Israel when US is right behind.... Except turkiye. For turkiye, the entire area was their backyard 100 years ago. Sense of nostalgia.
The arabs themselves are not united. If they combine forces they can wipe out Israel. All attack simultaneously and coordinated. Don’t let Israel focus their defence and don’t let Biden and western powers distract. They can do it.
They tried to gangbang Israel back in the day, twice. Failed both times.
And for the low IQ ones who say Israel had the assistance of 'Angmorika'... those Arab countries had the assistance of the Soviet Union. Back in those days, Soviet weapons were as good, if not better than American ones.
Let this actual historian from Tiongland teach you something:
Both times they were just teasing. The Arabs were not serious. If they had not done anything, they people will assassinate the leader.They tried to gangbang Israel back in the day, twice. Failed both times.
And for the low IQ ones who say Israel had the assistance of 'Angmorika'... those Arab countries had the assistance of the Soviet Union. Back in those days, Soviet weapons were as good, if not better than American ones.
Let this actual historian from Tiongland teach you something:
Great video by PRC historian. Two key points he said are:
PRC folks should assess whether Israel or Arab countries have contributed to PRC. He said PRC benefitted from early recognition of PRC back in '49, and from Israel desert farming and mil tech.
And PRC folks should also assess how Israel values its people. E.g. Cost of Iron Dome, defensive features of Merkava tank, rescue of hostages from Uganda, etc. Vs how Hamas values its people.
Conclusion - no reason for PRC folks to support Hamas!
PRC folks should assess whether Israel or Arab countries have contributed to PRC. He said PRC benefitted from early recognition of PRC back in '49, and from Israel desert farming and mil tech.
And PRC folks should also assess how Israel values its people. E.g. Cost of Iron Dome, defensive features of Merkava tank, rescue of hostages from Uganda, etc. Vs how Hamas values its people.
Conclusion - no reason for PRC folks to support Hamas!
Oil rich Arab just want to enjoy their oil riches. Who wants war when you can spend money and enjoy trade and fuck different women every night as you wish. Buy football clubs like dirt cheap.. and make Ang mo your slave and footstools
People has move on, perhaps the Arab has move on. Only Iran or Syria is still left behind.
After 9/11, those rich arabs were all Over South East Asia for R&R. I remember certain hotels had Arab speaking receptionist. Now they have gone back to Europe and the US.
such talk by Bilahari', a reinforcement to the Belief that such Schloars are over-paid B'Shitters ?
Why do we need such people?
Iran is not going to move. Cannot let the tail (Hamas) wank the dog, as Kausikan may say. Iran decides when to strike but reality is its striking power may be as easily vaporized as its former Quds commander Soleimani. Do not put Uncle Sam to the test. Iran is not China.
His ego got inflated when he thought he could run rings around Malaysian foreign policy.
Note his analysis is always prefaced by 'ifs'.
Any ah beng can do that.
If is a "Prerequisite". If this is to happened .. that outcome will happened.
Like that is like economic, if government keep on increasing the Interest rate. The economy will slow down as more people will keep their money to attract more saving ... Blah blah ...
Similar threads
