• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SDP will withdraw.

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
LTK is no Tang Liang Hong. Far from it. Chinese Chauvinist is a fitting description for him.

How can LTK be a Chinese Chauvinist when he is surrounded in the CEC by a vociferous Indian, Malay, English educated colleagues? How can he be a Chinese Chauvinist when he started as an only Teo Chew and Mandarin speaking politician, forced himself to learn English and now only speaks English in parliament? Before using this as an excuse to play racial politics, think carefully before you speak.
 

billisnotathome

Alfrescian
Loyal
Try to calm down and be less emotional.

Maybe if cunts like you and skponggol could stop starting a new thread ever single time you have another one of your ill-measured, inconsequential brain farts this forum would be slightly more readable and ordinary fucking punters like moi who come here for a fucking laugh and to read some interesting insights now and then wouldn't get pissed off enough to register for the sole purpose of telling you cuntflaps to fuck off? Just a kindly fucking thought for your kindly fucking consideration, yes? Good to understand each other.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
How can LTK be a Chinese Chauvinist when he is surrounded in the CEC by a vociferous Indian, Malay, English educated colleagues? How can he be a Chinese Chauvinist when he started as an only Teo Chew and Mandarin speaking politician, forced himself to learn English and now only speaks English in parliament? Before using this as an excuse to play racial politics, think carefully before you speak.

Any idea of when he will "force himself" to learn the National Language? Or is the language, culture and practices still beneath him? BTW, do you know the meaning of tokenism?
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If sdp is logical, it will withdraw and make it look like it helped trick pap in agreeing to BE. Which of sdp stronger candidate wants to damage his own reputation to be the villain that helped pap win this BE by creating 3 corner fight?



Problem is SDP does not do "irony" or "tactical positioning". The line was clearly drawn right from the start. They have no intention of backing down or tricking anyone. That is why from the start, activists acccepted the notion of MCF as inevitable.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal
LTK has been a public figure for 21 years as MP. Whatever hidden thoughts he has would have been exposed by now. Yet you are only able to tell people to believe you blindly. On what basis? Try harder next time.

Came across something else the other day.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2999133

I always thought that Harry Truman was such a decent guy. Never expected him to be called a racist, especially to Asians. Moral of the story is that it is possible for a politician to be racist and for people to not know about it. Or he can tell 1000 people that he is not a racist, and 5 people in private that he is, and the way that information spreads, the story told to 1000 people will win the day.

The only way to tell is to put him in power and see what he does. Of course it will be too late by then if he really is a racist.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal
No really, in fact, SDP's Holland/Bukit Timah Team is their best performer garnering 39.9% of votes ie. at par with
the national average opposition votes of 39.9% while their party's overall average were only 36.7%!

They accompanied their mission successfully: secured all the available opposition votes for Holland/Bukit Timah GRC:biggrin:

The other way to look at it is that SDP is the most improved party at the 2011 general elections. In 2006 they were polling in the 20s. Now they could get almost 40% in a GRC. At this rate by 2016 they would be winning landslides.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal
In the 2011GE even with a "Straight Fight" SDP average share of votes contested were only 36.7%, well below the
national opposition pool of 39.9%. Which is to say, about 3.2% of typical opposition voters were turn-off enough to
vote PAP instead.

SPP and NSP being a more moderate and progressive opposition parties did very well and garnered 41.4% and 39.2%
respectively of the opposition votes.

I dreaded to imagine a 3-corner fight between SDP, WP and incumbent PAP. SDP will be mauled!

Since the performance of SDP in 2006 and 2011 are so wildly inconsistent, there is no actual way to tell how well the SDP is doing now. If they were to contest, it's extremely hard to tell.

In fact, I would say that the only real way to tell is to participate and see what happens. Which is what they're going to do.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal
The effects of this move have already been felt. The PAP has already given quite a bit of exposure of its candidate while the Opposition parties are still deciding whether to contest. If I may say, only WP seems to be ready. As the incumbent opposition, they have decided very early on to contest. SDP seems ready to throw in the towel, otherwise why demand a negotiation at this late stage. Don't think they are ready in terms of funding and logistics.

The question that many people here are asking is "What does SDP intend to do?"

The answer is that most probably even the SDP doesn't know, so no point speculating.

The evidence is that they collected 3 forms. The only reason why you collect 3 forms without sending 3 candidates is so that you can get 3 people to fill them out, and then later on decide whose to turn in.
 

metalmickey

Alfrescian
Loyal

Pappy Tan The only PAP 'B' Team Singaporeans witness past 20 years is SDP and Dr Chee. Dr Chee at 1994 broke up a perfectly growing SDP under Chiam See Tong and lost all 3 seats at GE1997 that was won at GE1991 under Chiam See Tong's SDP.

People who work in computer security have one saying. There is no difference between malicious and buggy code.

Therefore the question of whether or not SDP is a mole or Chee Soon Juan is incompetent is not important.
 

elephanto

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Maybe if cunts like you and skponggol could stop starting a new thread ever single time you have another one of your ill-measured, inconsequential brain farts this forum would be slightly more readable and ordinary fucking punters like moi who come here for a fucking laugh and to read some interesting insights now and then wouldn't get pissed off enough to register for the sole purpose of telling you cuntflaps to fuck off? Just a kindly fucking thought for your kindly fucking consideration, yes? Good to understand each other.
Clap ! Clap ! Clap !
 

RandomNexus

Alfrescian
Loyal
It looks like nearly everyone are taking the bet - that SDP will contest.

I still think that better ones within SDP will guide the less than sensible ones. This is not about principles or the right to contest, it is also about the impact from voters and the general populace if the contest occurs. We have to bear in mind that SDP poll badly over many GEs until the last one. Despite all the noise, even smaller parties and lesser known opposition identities outdid SDP.

If they contest, there is no doubt that they will trail behind WP. How badly they perform will depend on candidates that are offered by both parties.

It depends on whether the sensible folks in SDP can persuade those not-so-sensible ones not to go ahead.

SDP has seen a surge in members, and it is not wise to waste these resources to fight this by-election and giving PAP a chance to win. WP has already stood in the last election with a sizeable vote and voters are familiar with them. Rightly speaking, it should let WP take the lead.

Desmond is just as hopeless - it is kindness even to mention him here. He should step out of the political arena for good unless he wants to contribute gaiety to the scene.

SDP has good folks, and what a waste to have them depicted in the politically naive way like CSJ. Every 4 years come a long way, and do not waste your time to bring down your reputation again, CSJ. SDP has been politically destroyed because of you. I have some glimpses of hope recently and old habits die hard, and I am more convinced once again that history will repeat itself. What a pity for SDP as it could have been a beacon of hope and good work done by Chiam all gone to waste.
 

andyfisher

Alfrescian
Loyal
wheres the wp reply? I highly doubt SDP will w/draw.
But I wish vw stands, tht guy talks a lot of sense, unlike some other idiots.

if oppos gadoh, the paps win, simple truism, so paps, dont become a stained pap smear, work together la. tolong.
chinkpore nw lagi chia lat place ever since the pinky ascended to the dragon throne. pls la
 

rainnix

Alfrescian
Loyal
Anyone cares to bet?

After the release of the letter to LTK by CSJ containing the threat, the dye has been cast. The attempt to blackmail LTK would not go down well with voters. SDP has now painted itself in a corner.

Even if all the SDP members and supporters including the CEC are keen to field an SP candidate, knowing enough of VW, TSL, Ang or PT. I am certain that all 4 of them are sensible enough not to damage SDP or the opposition cause any further. Thats leave a bare cupboard where quality professionals are concerned. That leaves the political charlatan who has issues with submission of forms not once but twice and also the part time prostitute both of whom are not worth much in terms of votes.

Common sense will prevail. SDP should aim for 2016 and work the ground.

Another WP IB trying to manage opinions. No threat had been cast, CSJ only request WP to meet and negotiate. SDP will not withdraw. You should have seen the email Slyvia sent to SDP. As long as WP refusing to work with other oppositions, this BE and 2016 will backfire on them and they will lose votes.

Of course there are merits to 3CF and the better party will emerge victorious.
 
Top