• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Peaceful belgium moroccan muslim migrants screaming ‘Allahu akbar’ riot after Morocco beats Belgium in World Cup

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
What a INCESTUOUS clown you are...
Pot calling kettle black..
Wakakakakakakakakaka.....


how did your 76 IQ brain manage to link incest to your cow urine drink?


article-2538520-1AA0001E00000578-693_636x382.jpg
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
mohammedans have been called moslems since long ago. You're trying to edit your moslem religion once again.

When Baby Boomers were children it was Moslem. The American Heritage Dictionary (1992) noted,"Moslem is the form predominantly preferred in journalism and popular usage. Muslim is preferred by scholars and by English-speaking adherents of Islam." No more. Now, almost everybody uses Muslim.

Journalists switched to Muslim from Moslem in recent years under pressure from Islamic groups. But the use of the word Moslem has not entirely ceased. Established institutions which used the older form of the name have been reluctant to change. The American Moslem Foundation is still the American Moslem Foundation (much as the NAACP is still the NAACP--the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). The journal The Moslem World--published by the Hartford Seminary in Connecticut--is still The Moslem World.

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/524

Who the fuck are these country bumpkin inbred redneck cowboy yankee incestuous rats?

They're not even a country 300 years old with no history built on red indian graves and skulls, skeletons consisting of refugees huddled masses country bumpkins cowboys yokels and the whole lot. With low IQ, lower sophistication, less inventiveness, boorishness in abundance to boot.

Exactly as I had long suspected, you are a single digit IQ slanty-impostor, yankee bot.

A faggot to boot, who has got his arse penetrated regularly and with delight by his ang moh kia pastors and priests.

Bloody morons don't even have a language of their own and use English instead. :roflmao:

You're clearly a retard who knows nothing about your own mohammedan history. Even moslem history books admit that moslems were foreign invaders. But they justify those invasions and land stealing because to moslem scholars, moslem invaders brought about civilization and great sciences in the wake of their imperialism. A good example is the Emirate of Cordoba, which was established by moslem arab and berber invaders who crossed the seas in ships from Africa to a different continent.


Muslims saved kafir Christians oppressed by other groups of kafir christians and at their call, reached to liberate them, and along with it, brought some semblance of civilization, advancement, science, technology, learning, progress, intellect to the shores of Europe. For 800 odd years Muslims ruled over them and advanced them, that was the only reason. You did not see Muslims genociding ceca virus ( a wrong move, I'd say, in retrospect) like yankee cowboys have done to red indians (and then conveniently rewrote history to blame it on some viruses) or ozzie sheepshaggers have done to aboriginals.

You did not see Muslims conquering all of Africa all the way down to the southern shores, or all of europe to its northernmost reaches. Granted, Turkish donkeys lost as early as 1500s to Portuguese, feeble weakling Portuguese, on water, in the seas, in oceans, in naval battles, i.e. in the 16th century of the Christian era, Turkish donkeys had already begun to lose against teeny tiny Portugal far from Portuguese shores, this points to the simple fact that Turkish/Anatolian donkeys are not really a martial race or warrior kind and could not even defeat a teeny tiny gayropean country like Portugal looooooooong before Industrial Revolution, so they had absolutely no chance of conquering gayropeans on their own, but if all Muslims incl Safawis (although they were shia radicals) in Iran and Mughals in Mughal Sultanate had joined hands, worked together, formed an alliance, they could have possibly conquered all of Gayrope and it's instructive that unlike losers like Iran or anatolian/Turkish donkeys, or loser weaklings like let's say mediterraneans or most gayropeans who were easily conquered by romans looooooong before industrial revolution, such places as other ancient civilizations with great history and advancement and wealth and intellect such as Mughal Sultanate incl Bangla Subah, or previously Bangla Sultanate, or many others had never in history ---- in their entire recorded history - EVER been conquered or defeated by any gayropean countries EVER prior to Industrial Revolution.

It is true that Alexander led Greeks to conquer Egypt or Iran going as far as Pakistan or parts of Afghanistan, some parts of CECA virus looooooooooong before Industrial Revolution, and also it's true that CECA virus were truly subjugated and ruled for 1000 years by their Muslim masters plus 200 years by their pommie masters (who actually created this artificial country called India, which had never existed ever before in history before the pommies created it), so they too can not claim they were never defeated conquered or colonized by gayropeans or others before industrial revolution. on that count, they can not claim any bit of greatness.

ONLY those countries, civilizations, peoples, who were great advanced prosperous wealthy and NEVER conquered subjugated by gayropeans in history before Industrial Revolution may claim greatness.

You need to meet both of these requirements, at least, to be great.

1. to have been a great civilization, advanced, wealthy, powerful, influential, intellectually sophisticated, cultured or most of them (more than 2/3)

AND

2. NEVER conquered defeated subjugated colonized ruled by gayropeans (not even for one nanosecond) before Industrial Revolution.


Clearly losers around the mediteranean region gayrope (such as england france germany spain etc etc) as well as wider middle east (such as anatolia iran iraq syria egypt tunisia etc etc) don't satisfy these requirements they were easily conquered ruled subjugated colonized by greeks and/or romans.


This holds equally true for afghan pakis ceca virus (to some extents at least) since alexander led greeks to conquer them, too, even if partially. moreover ceca virus were ruled by their muslim masters for 1000 years apart from 200 years of Pommie rule.


:roflmao: :roflmao::roflmao:


When you read some history, then come back to debate. Your arse was clearly reamed by moslem jihadists and imams before. Now, your head is up your own arse so deep.


It's bad enough that you got your arse penetrated by your ang moh kia priests and pastors, now you take a peculiar interest in others' arses and even claim to "see things clearly" and talk with amazing levels of sophistication and aplomb about taking your head up your arse.

It seems you have an abiding interest in taking it up the arse and exploring such a disgusting topic further.

But it may have escaped you, most civilized people, most people who dislike slanty faggots and bots like you, would be alarmed at your perverted obsession with, weird fascination about arses.

You should consult your shrink first, he may recommend the right kind of medical help you need.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
mohameddans drinking camel urine, as instructed by your sole moslem prophet. Has it made moslems healthier yet?

View attachment 172287

View attachment 172288

View attachment 172289


1. None of them show them extracting camel urine and drinking it.

First one shows some one drinking some liquid, it could be tea. maybe.

Second one shows someone collecting camel urine probably in pakistan or other turd world sh@thole.

Pakistan has plenty of ceca virus incl millions upon millions of polytheists. Not unexpected.

Third one presumably shows some Saudi or camel rider posing with his mouth agape next to some camel. Maybe stupid tiongkok tiktok app or some other nonsense at work.


This is how you present evidence.



article-2538520-1AA0001E00000578-693_636x382.jpg


You should have known if you were not a single digit IQ yankee bot impostor slanty.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Muslims saved kafir Christians oppressed by other groups of kafir christians and at their call, reached to liberate them, and along with it, brought some semblance of civilization, advancement, science, technology, learning, progress, intellect to the shores of Europe.

There you go. Admitting that foreign invasion and land stealing is fine as long as you bring technology to the land. But isn't that what you also claim is illegal with regard to modern Israel?

For 800 odd years Muslims ruled over them and advanced them,

Where did you get that 800 years from? The moslem emirate of Cordoba barely 300 years before it broke apart in 1015 into little taifa kingdoms.

Here's a map of the Iberian peninsular in 1150, where the native Spaniards have regained about 2/3 of their country from the foreign Moroccan moslem colonizers. From AD 700+ to 1150 isn't 800 years, no matter how you try to round up the numbers.

1671022192736.png
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
1. None of them show them extracting camel urine and drinking it.

You're still in denial.

I know that you suck zakir naik's cock. So let's see what he has to say about drinking camel urine. Even your own scriptures says your moslem 'prophet' promoted drinking camel urine.

1671022311760.png


Islamist preacher Zakir Naik, who has been on the run from the Indian law enforcement authorities, is not new to controversies. A video of the fugitive, explaining the health benefits of camel urine in the light of Islam, has now gone viral on social media. It is ironic that while Muslims regularly use the ‘gaumutra’ (cow urine) jibe to insult Hindus, they believe that camel urine is beneficial to health.

Islamic preacher lists down health benefits of drinking camel urine

“According to the research done by Dr. Abdul Fateh Mehmood Idris, he says that the urine of the camel can be used in certain skin diseases…Scientific research has proven that urine makes the hair lustrous and thick. It is also used in the prevention of dandruff,” Zakir Naik alleged. He then went on to quote the ‘research’ done by another Muslim microbiologist named Dr. Ahlaam Al Awadi. The Islamic preacher this time added that Dr. Awadi’s research showed that camel urine can even cure hepatitis, besides skin diseases and dandruff.

Zakir Naik quotes authentic Islamic Hadith to justify the drinking of camel urine

Towards the end of his video, Zakir Naik quoted verse 5686 of the Hadith of Sahih-al-Bukhari. It goes as, “The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy. Then they killed the shepherd and drove away the camels. When the news reached the Prophet e sent some people in their pursuit. When they were brought, he cut their hands and feet and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron”


https://www.opindia.com/2021/05/isl...xplains-the-benefits-of-drinking-camel-urine/
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
There you go. Admitting that foreign invasion and land stealing is fine as long as you bring technology to the land. But isn't that what you also claim is illegal with regard to modern Israel?



Where did you get that 800 years from? The moslem emirate of Cordoba barely 300 years before it broke apart in 1015 into little taifa kingdoms.

Here's a map of the Iberian peninsular in 1150, where the native Spaniards have regained about 2/3 of their country from the foreign Moroccan moslem colonizers. From AD 700+ to 1150 isn't 800 years, no matter how you try to round up the numbers.

View attachment 172302



And the non Christians including jews were forced into exile in muslim land.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
And the non Christians including jews were forced into exile in muslim land.

Back centuries ago, the moslems in Christian native lands were encouraged by their mosques to be disloyal to their host countries, to help foreign moslem invaders by spying or even switching sides during battle to defend their country. Some things don't change over the centuries. That's why Ah Gong worried about putting moslems in charge of machine gun units back in the 1970s.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Back centuries ago, the moslems in Christian native lands were encouraged by their mosques to be disloyal to their host countries, to help foreign moslem invaders by spying or even switching sides during battle to defend their country. Some things don't change over the centuries. That's why Ah Gong worried about putting moslems in charge of machine gun units back in the 1970s.
It won't change the fate of the island. one day, it shall return to its rightful owner,
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
It won't change the fate of the island. one day, it shall return to its rightful owner,

Singapore is already with its rightful owners, the Singaporeans. The muuds are not the rightful owners. They are immigrants from the indonesian islands.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
There you go. Admitting that foreign invasion and land stealing is fine as long as you bring technology to the land. But isn't that what you also claim is illegal with regard to modern Israel?


No. That's just your slanty eye low IQ bot nature doing tricks on you.

Roderic was supposedly the name of a cruel kafir Christian king who oppressed other kafir Christians, Those oppressed christians invited Muslims to liberate them, and so they did, along the way introducing civilization. Zionist terrorists are an illegal regime not even recognized by their region and bringing nothing fruitful to its region let alone beyond.

It's only other viciously virulently anti Muslim, anti Islamic entities (such as stinkypura) who hype up zionist terrorists as some wonders of humanity that improvise or develop highly advanced tech while in reality, those countries (such as Turkiey) who happened to have forged close diplomatic ties with them have found out they are merely recipients of foreign tech and assemblers of foreing imported parts more than anything else. In other words, Zionist terrorist entity is nothing more than a colonial implanted terrorist entity in that region. Once/if the West falls, so do zionists.

Even Commiecat tiongkok does not look up to Zionists as source of any tech or knowledge or invention or what ever nonsense only lousiest countries like stinkypura would do so, and pathetic cow urine drinkers such as ceca virus have begun to realize their earlier follies and limitations of assemblers and importers known as zionists, so they have begun to cast their nets wider and begun engaging bigger powers such as tiongs gayropeans japs yanks russkies (for nuclear powered submarines cryogenic engines for space programmes for their supersonic cruise missiles etc etc etc).


Where did you get that 800 years from? The moslem emirate of Cordoba barely 300 years before it broke apart in 1015 into little taifa kingdoms.

Here's a map of the Iberian peninsular in 1150, where the native Spaniards have regained about 2/3 of their country from the foreign Moroccan moslem colonizers. From AD 700+ to 1150 isn't 800 years, no matter how you try to round up the numbers.


Christian fanatic crusaders finally managed to plunge Andalusia in the dark ages through a campaign of vicious terrorism and vandalism in 1492, the same year in which Christopher Columbus set sailt westwards to land in the territories of Red Indians. Muslims ruled over CECA virus, then, too.


From 711 to 1492 sounds pretty close to 800 years but if you want to round it down to 780 years, it's fine by me.


1. Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who could openly give the adhan that is the call for prayers.

Spain, under Muslim rule, became a beacon of art, science and culture for Europe. Mosques, palaces, gardens, hospitals and libraries were built. Canals were repaired and new ones were dug. New crops were introduced from other parts of the Muslim empire and agricultural production increased. Andalus became the granary of the Maghrib.




BBC - Religions - Islam: Muslim Spain (711-1492)




A Brief Guide to the Marvelous History of the Moors in Spain Originally from the North African country of Morocco, the Moors were medieval Muslims who once ruled over areas that currently comprise Spain, Portugal, and Septimania.




and loads of ceca virus also admit the truth about their history


R M Sayani in his Presidential address at the 12th session of the Congress held in 1896 said, "Before the advent of the British in India (i.e. the Brits created India, there had never existed any such monstrosity as India prior to that), the Muslims were the rulers of the country. The Hindus were in awe of them.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore is already with its rightful owners, the Singaporeans. The muuds are not the rightful owners. They are immigrants from the indonesian islands.

Stinkypura is part of Malaysia.

Old fart Harry Lee chanted Merdeka Malaysia, and did it gleefully.
That tells you Stinkypura belongs to Malaysia.

Anybody who calls themselves Chinese in Malaysia (incl stinkypura) should go back to tiongkok.

Anybody who calls themselves Indian in Malaysia (incl stinkypura) should go back to ceca virus.


noen of these countries are members of asean.

asean members are free to visit each others' countries, work in each others countries, chart a shared future together, that's all OK.

I think bangla can be invited into ASEAN too, if Bangla can be freed from CECA virus clutches and then Muslim voice influence and Islamic belief will be strengthend further in ASEAN since the rule of thumb is the farther away from the core of Islamic Ummah you are the weaker your Iman tends to be (see Indon or Malaun for that matter and compare with saudi yemen palestine iraq qatar afghanistan etc). you can also compare far flung morocco or some subsaharan negro afro country with supposedly muslim population and compare with Muslim heartlands with longer and greater history of Islam.


Turkiye also wanted to be members of aseaN they can be invited too, dialogue partnership can be extended to niggers. afro, as well.

but NO to ceca virus, no to Tiongkok.

keep ceca tiong out of ASEAN at all costs.

so if anybody in malaysia incl stinkypura calls themselves chinese, we should ask them to go back to tiongkok.

if anybody in malaysia incl stinkypura calls themselves indian, we should ask them to go back to ceca virus.

NONE of them are ASEAN members and should never be.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
You're still in denial.

I know that you suck zakir naik's cock. So let's see what he has to say about drinking camel urine. Even your own scriptures says your moslem 'prophet' promoted drinking camel urine.
https://www.opindia.com/2021/05/isl...xplains-the-benefits-of-drinking-camel-urine/


No.

He's a CECA.

I've already stated as a true blue CECA, true to his roots, he likes to promote urine drinking.

Only CECA do it.

Hadiths are not trustable since even the most die hard hadith fanatics admit that (many) Hadiths were forged, and that all die hard Hadith fanatics admit that sects are created based on which Hadiths they follow. Since the Quran explicitly forbids the formation and adherence to sects within Islam, anybody who forms sects and adheres to sects goes against the Quran.

As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, you have no part of them in the least. Their affair is with Allah; He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did." (6:159)




Different sects even have their own set of Hadiths to follow.

Any Hadith fanatic - by default - goes against this verse of the Quran.


ALL sects are the consequences of Hadiths.

Different sects follow and believe in different Hadiths.

If Muslims are split into different sects, it's all because of Hadiths and Hadith fanatics go against explicit Quranic instructions when they do so.

So are Hadiths Islamic?
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
The malay land encompasses from aceh to Kalimantan and southern philippines.
If philippinos had not been colonised by spanish, they could be speaking malay too. And champa central vietnam which speak with kelantanese accent.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Stinkypura is part of Malaysia.

Only for a few years. Both are modern countries, with no history of ever existing as a unified political entity on their own before the British.


Old fart Harry Lee chanted Merdeka Malaysia, and did it gleefully.
That tells you Stinkypura belongs to Malaysia.

The muud tengku told Singapore to leave forever. That tells you that Singapore is free from islamic oppression forever.

Anybody who calls themselves Chinese in Malaysia (incl stinkypura) should go back to tiongkok.

Anyone who calls themselves muud in jiuhu should go back to Indonesia. Even the muud sultans admit that they are settlers from indons, and their sultanates in malaya were founded as colonial kingdoms.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Roderic was supposedly the name of a cruel kafir Christian king who oppressed other kafir Christians, Those oppressed christians invited Muslims to liberate them,

Of course, that's how moslems distort and rewrite history, stating that natives invited mohameddans to invade and raid their lands.

Zionist terrorists are an illegal regime not even recognized by their region and bringing nothing fruitful to its region let alone beyond.

Why not? Zionists merely did the same thing as what moslem colonialists used to do in Iberia - sail in ships to foreign land, invade and conquer. The moslems in British Palestine were oppressing native Jews, and Jews decided to fight back and kick the foreign moslem invaders out of Israel and later on, Jerusalem.

In other words, Zionist terrorist entity is nothing more than a colonial implanted terrorist entity in that region. Once/if the West falls, so do zionists.

Sounds very much like your medieval moslem emirate of Cordoba in Iberia. Strangely, the only reason why you're okay with moslem colonialism is because of a common islamic religion. Nothing more.

Christian fanatic crusaders finally managed to plunge Andalusia in the dark ages through a campaign of vicious terrorism and vandalism in 1492, the same year in which Christopher Columbus set sailt westwards to land in the territories of Red Indians.

Again, that is wrong. The moslem colonial state of Cordoba fell apart by the early 1100s as I shown earlier. By the mid 1100s, the Christian natives of Spain had already liberated 2/3 of Iberia from foreign moslem colonial rule. The surviving sultanate at Granada was a tributary state to Christians for the next few centuries before the Christians decided to liberate the entirety of Iberia, which was completed in 1492 after a 10 year war with the sultanate at Granada.

Learn some real history instead of talking rubbish and posting inaccurate exaggerations to make your religion look bigger. You sound like a kid.

From 711 to 1492 sounds pretty close to 800 years but if you want to round it down to 780 years, it's fine by me.


1. Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years.

Mostly refuted above. Map of Iberia in 1200. Iberia doesn't looked very ruled by moslems as you claim. Yet another exaggeration and inflation of numbers by islamists like yourself.

1671024933422.png


Map of Iberia in 1300. The moslem colonial sultanate in Iberia has shrunk even more.

1671025169323.png



1. Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years.

You are a complete fucktard. Spain was formally formed only in 1479, by the joining of the main Iberian kingdoms of Castile and Aragon. Learn some history instead of bullshitting and exaggerating.
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Hadiths are not trustable since even the most die hard hadith fanatics admit that (many) Hadiths were forged, and that all die hard Hadith fanatics admit that sects are created based on which Hadiths they follow. Since the Quran explicitly forbids the formation and adherence to sects within Islam, anybody who forms sects and adheres to sects goes against the Quran.

That's your own theology and you're in the very small minority. Mainstream sunni moslem theology states that the hadiths is considered as a key source of islamic religious instruction.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
The malay land encompasses from aceh to Kalimantan and southern philippines.
If philippinos had not been colonised by spanish, they could be speaking malay too. And champa central vietnam which speak with kelantanese accent.


Whole ASEAN is one.

Even Bangla can be included in ASEAN if/when Bangla is freed from the clutches of saffron ceca radical terrorists (Brahminist radicals).

That'll increase ASEAN population, number of Muslims, Islamic orientation (since rule of thumb is closer you are to the core/heart of Islamic Ummah, the closer you are to Islam and vice versa; e.g. look at far flung places in negro africa or malaun or indon for that matter, none are Islamic whereas compared with suudi afghan yemen palestine iraq and others in the heart/core, you see the populations countries cultures are more deeply entrenched in Islamic observance belief customs and such), increase number of workers, increase market size etc and therefore improve ASEAN bargaining position vis-a-vis CECA virus and/or Tiong.

Tiongkok alone, or ceca virus alone, got about 2x as many ppl as ASEAN, so no question of ASEAN accepting ceca virus or tiong as members. Since Indon are self proclaimed ASEAN leaders and they've got GDP/economy (only one in asean with above $1 trillion GDP on exchange rate basis), they should have been able to force burmese to change track on Rohingya issue, and they should be able to force other ASEAN members to accept Bangla in their midst.

Question is why Indon can't do any of the above? Is it because self proclaimed ASEAN leader is a joke and seen as a joke by others in ASEAN as such so no one pays any heed to indon empty rhetoric or hot air? Is it because the bogus theory that GDP/economy is ultimately what decides the national power or might or military might of a country is also bogus as proven - repeatedly - by the case of Indon?
 
Top