Paying premium prices to only meet minimum guidelines. Acceptable? In preparation for 6.9 mil population and beyond?
http://mypaper.sg/top-stories/pasir-ris-ones-narrow-corridors-meet-guidelines-20150625
[h=3][/h]QUESTION OF SPACE: A worker walks along the common corridor of an apartment block at the DBSS project. The corridors are 1.2m wide; SCDF guidelines state that there must be a clear passage of at least 1.2m along corridors.
ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
[h=2]Video[/h]
Published on Jun 25, 2015
[h=2]Pasir Ris One's narrow corridors meet guidelines[/h]
AMOS LEE and JANICE HENG
THE narrow corridors of premium Housing Board project Pasir Ris One are making some residents feel squeezed.
The 1.2m-wide corridors of the Design, Build and Sell Scheme development are technically within regulations. Yet they put a crimp on everyday life, said residents such as Shaun Chew, 51.
"My neighbour and I cannot even open our doors at the same time," said the supervisor, who lives in a five-room flat on the ground floor.
The Singapore Civil Defence Force's (SCDF's) guidelines state that there must be a clear passage of at least 1.2m along corridors.
The same width was specified in the Building and Construction Authority's Accessibility Code until a 2013 revision.
Since 1.2m is exactly the width provided, the development sits on the margins of the rule. New residential projects submitted for approval from April 1 last year must have a 1.5m minimum width instead.
The Pasir Ris One corridors run up against another restriction.
Most town councils have by-laws against obstructions in common corridors, which typically follow SCDF's guidelines.
If residents put items outside their flat, they must leave a passage of at least 1.2m.
In HDB corridors which are 1.4m wide, for instance, this is not a problem. For Pasir Ris One, this means that no one can place items outside their homes.
When The Straits Times visited yesterday, the corridors were bare except for one or two pairs of shoes outside some units.
"The designs and plans for this development have been approved and fall within all guidelines stipulated by the BCA, which were established with safety and comfort of residents in mind," said manager and project administrator Dennis Lam from SingHaiyi Group, which jointly developed Pasir Ris One with Kay Lim Holdings.
"That said, we take the residents' views seriously and will take all feedback on board for review," he added.
But these technicalities do not change the reality for residents. Said Mr Chew: "There is a childcare centre nearby. With the narrow corridor, if we happen to open our doors, (they) may hit the children."
Not being able to place items outside is not a big issue for some residents, though. Their units have balconies for potted plants and an entry area for shoes.
"It is okay if there are no obstructions," said Lin Jun Yao, 29, who lives in a five-roomer with his family of five.
For Mr Lin, workmanship was more of a concern. "The tiling was uneven, cabinet joints loose and materials were cheap."
Other home owners noted scratched tiles, leaking pipes and noisy doors.
Said Mr Lam: "We are in touch with owners who have provided us with feedback and are currently working with them to address their respective concerns."
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://mypaper.sg/top-stories/pasir-ris-ones-narrow-corridors-meet-guidelines-20150625
ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
[h=2]Video[/h]
Published on Jun 25, 2015
[h=2]Pasir Ris One's narrow corridors meet guidelines[/h]
AMOS LEE and JANICE HENG
THE narrow corridors of premium Housing Board project Pasir Ris One are making some residents feel squeezed.
The 1.2m-wide corridors of the Design, Build and Sell Scheme development are technically within regulations. Yet they put a crimp on everyday life, said residents such as Shaun Chew, 51.
"My neighbour and I cannot even open our doors at the same time," said the supervisor, who lives in a five-room flat on the ground floor.
The Singapore Civil Defence Force's (SCDF's) guidelines state that there must be a clear passage of at least 1.2m along corridors.
The same width was specified in the Building and Construction Authority's Accessibility Code until a 2013 revision.
Since 1.2m is exactly the width provided, the development sits on the margins of the rule. New residential projects submitted for approval from April 1 last year must have a 1.5m minimum width instead.
The Pasir Ris One corridors run up against another restriction.
Most town councils have by-laws against obstructions in common corridors, which typically follow SCDF's guidelines.
If residents put items outside their flat, they must leave a passage of at least 1.2m.
In HDB corridors which are 1.4m wide, for instance, this is not a problem. For Pasir Ris One, this means that no one can place items outside their homes.
When The Straits Times visited yesterday, the corridors were bare except for one or two pairs of shoes outside some units.
"The designs and plans for this development have been approved and fall within all guidelines stipulated by the BCA, which were established with safety and comfort of residents in mind," said manager and project administrator Dennis Lam from SingHaiyi Group, which jointly developed Pasir Ris One with Kay Lim Holdings.
"That said, we take the residents' views seriously and will take all feedback on board for review," he added.
But these technicalities do not change the reality for residents. Said Mr Chew: "There is a childcare centre nearby. With the narrow corridor, if we happen to open our doors, (they) may hit the children."
Not being able to place items outside is not a big issue for some residents, though. Their units have balconies for potted plants and an entry area for shoes.
"It is okay if there are no obstructions," said Lin Jun Yao, 29, who lives in a five-roomer with his family of five.
For Mr Lin, workmanship was more of a concern. "The tiling was uneven, cabinet joints loose and materials were cheap."
Other home owners noted scratched tiles, leaking pipes and noisy doors.
Said Mr Lam: "We are in touch with owners who have provided us with feedback and are currently working with them to address their respective concerns."
[email protected]
[email protected]
)
