• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP struggling with WP's multi-prong attack.

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Certainly not a chap whose plans, ideas, predictions, confident you-wait-and-see taunts have not had a single one ever materialised.

That fellow, while useful, is division 2 category. But when dealing with him, must always massage his ego by reinforcing that he is the bestest of the best and the one and only. As long as ada shiok sendiri, he will proceed to carry out his mission. Easy to handle him. Many will fall into this division 2 category.
 
M

Mdm Tang

Guest
1st parliament meeting after election already have so many question. Next one will be worst more daring question from WP if will be hard to answer by PAP.
Question like
1. How many PR approved year by year in last 10 year
2. How many FT worker year by year in last 10 year.
3. How many FT in service line
4. How many FT student paid by gov and total of amount $$$
5. What will be new revised salary for Ministers
6. Why MRT keep breakdown how to justify the fare increase?
...................
................




@@@@@@




http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/freshness-more-openness-parliament-024104569.html




..‘Higher degree of intelligence at Parliament’..By Seah Chiang Nee
.PostsWebsite .By Seah Chiang Nee | SingaporeScene – Tue, Oct 25, 2011



The absence of Lee Kuan Yew seems to have helped spur more openness at Parliament. (Yahoo! photo)

Singapore's Parliament is meeting for the first time with Lee Kuan Yew no longer in the Cabinet and the mood reflects the historic occasion.

It points to a post-Kuan Yew era that ended recently with the former prime minister's retirement from both the Cabinet and the People's Action Party (PAP) leadership.

His son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, is now de facto his own man.

Psychologically, the departure of the man who has had a hand in almost everything in Singapore for 46 years seems to have jolted people and politics into action.

Although 88-year-old Kuan Yew remains a Member of Parliament, the man who helped to transform this city into one of the wealthiest in the world is unlikely to play any more major role in future.

Whether by design or coincidence, Kuan Yew left Singapore for visits to Turkey and the United States a day before Parliament began its meeting.

The impact of his absence has been marked. I am happy to note there was none of the bitterness or name-calling that some of my friends had warned me to expect from this session.

More openness at Parliament

Instead, there was a new level of freshness and a higher degree of intelligence.

Several ruling PAP members spoke with candour seldom heard before, touching on some sensitive subjects rarely done in the past without a slap-down from Kuan Yew.

A few called for changes in the country's elected presidency system and its complex Parliament representatives such as non-constituency or nominated MPs in the wake of the new political environment.

One wanted the quota for foreign workers changed.

However, others, true to past forms, stuck closely to party positions and denying anything is really wrong.

It is apparent that Hsien Loong has signalled to his MPs of his readiness to have more open discussions.

The PAP representatives also took the cue from Hsien Loong when he himself had publicly apologised for government mistakes in the past five years, especially in public housing, transport and healthcare.

In spite of his unprecedented apology, his party lost an unprecedented six seats out of the 87 at stake and its popular votes fell to an all-time low of 60 per cent.

Opposition quality

The biggest difference is the largest number of opposition MPs in modern record and their quality showed.

As a result, public interest in the proceedings has gone up for the first time in years.

At the height of Kuan Yew's strongman rule, many Singaporeans had paid scant attention to Singapore's Parliament, regarding it merely as performing a rubber-stamp role.

Instead, interest was focused on the Cabinet and Lee in particular as the sole power of change.

With few exceptions, backbenchers were reluctant to counter or challenge the leadership or to present alternative arguments.

The Cabinet made the decision and Parliament's duty was to approve it, often without real debate.

That was the practice that Kuan Yew felt was an effective way of building prosperity. Too much democracy and contesting arguments, he felt, were bad for economic growth.

Although as a session to discuss the President's speech, such a meeting has traditionally produced little more than general statements of intent.

"It is usually time for MPs to get some limelight by talking a lot without saying anything meaningful beyond making general promises," said a reporter covering it. "This time things may be a little different."

He said many PAP MPs knew that if they didn't perform well in the public eye, they would be voted out in the next election.

More commitments by government

Already public pressures have produced a commitment to build more subsidised flats, more hawker centres to reduce food costs and a cut-down in the car population over three years.

"With better education, the voters are better able to distinguish between general pledges and concrete plans made by politicians," said one blogger.

The major commitments include the following:

* Construction of 50,000 more public flats in 2011-12, and two more new townships will eventually be built. If needed, HUB could build up to 100,000 within the next five years;

* Foreign ownership of private property will be tightened to about half the present number; and

* Ten hawker centres will be built over the next 10 years to meet increasing demand.

While Parliament was meeting, the person in charge of transport was watching trains.

He had a compelling reason to do so; for days, public complaints had been piling up on his desk about frequent breakdowns and jam-packed stations during peak hours.

Since he took over as Transport Minister, Liu Tuck Yew had been travelling on trains and buses to see how the over-crowdedness can be resolved.

Political history being made

In Singapore, political history is being made in many small steps rather than one big leap.

Last week, as Parliament was meeting, some Singaporeans tried without success to organise a Wall Street-type protest in Singapore's business district against the excesses of capitalism.

About 20 people showed up, an apparent failure.

However, one analyst said the Singapore success story was not totally free of the Wall Street features, which meant more attempts could be expected.

Here, too, we have had incessant rental increases that produced no innovation or opportunity for others, except the landlord.

"We must not allow capitalism to continue strengthen the powers and wealth or a small group to exploit the population and encourage an ever-widening income gap," one surfer said.

"I just hope that we do not go down the same slope as Wall Street by adopting policies that are inclusive and caring for Singaporeans who have fallen through the cracks," he added.
 

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is exactly what he said:“在这国会的任期里,希望明理的执政党可以做唐太宗,而我们来做魏徵,开出太平盛世,而不是一个执政者独断,而小人唯唯诺诺的世代。”

Source: http://www.facebook.com/ChenShowMao/posts/215120328553235

Goh Meng Seng

Yes, that's what he said. However, did you not realise that what he is trying to say is for the PAP government not to view WP as an adversary, but to see them as a critical voice like Wei Zhen to Li Shimin?

As far as I am concern, I am happy and agree with what CSM has said. PAP government should be receptive to alternative views WP is offering so that Singapore can move forward, just like how the Tang Dynasty had prospered during Li Shimin's time.
 

Conqueror

Alfrescian
Loyal
Revolution Is The Key To Drastic Change

Singapore parliament is not a place where policies are made !

Opposing PAP too obviously will not win votes.

If WP MPs try to be more PAP -like MPs, they can win votes !

At this juncture, the chief objective is to win votes !

Heroes cannot win votes at the parliament !

Things naturally change if WP can have 30 more MPs at the parliament !

Winning votes in singapore is like playing chess, we have daft voters !

See far not see near !

I had told them about the cure for this fascist disease. Everyone just wants an easy way out by drinking 'cooling' Chinese herbal soup, tai-chi or some form of magnetic cushion ... they all feared the scalpel. The late Steve Jobs surrendered too. I heard he was a natural bastard.
 
Top