• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beliefs.

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ministry of Home Affairs press statement on the ISA
06:44 PM Sep 16, 2011The Government notes the announcement by Malaysia that it will be replacing its Internal Security Act (ISA) with new legislation aimed at preventing "subversive action, organised violence and criminal acts".

The ISA in Singapore and Malaysia may have the same roots from the time when both were British colonies, but the two countries and their respective societies have evolved differently over time. Accordingly, the ISA in Singapore has evolved and is now different from that in Malaysia. A person arrested under the ISA in Singapore may be held in custody for up to 30 days after which an Order of Detention or Restriction Order must be issued or else the person must be released unconditionally. In Malaysia, the period of custody is up to 60 days. Also, under the Singapore ISA, since 1991, the President has the power to veto the Government's decision to detain a detainee if the ISA Advisory Board, which is chaired by a Supreme Court Judge, has recommended the release of the detainee. This was an additional safeguard enacted by the Singapore Government to prevent misuse of the Act.

The Singapore Government has used the ISA sparingly. The ISA has only been used against individuals who have acted in a manner prejudicial to the security of Singapore or to the maintenance of public order or essential services therein. No person has ever been detained only for their political beliefs.

The ISA in Singapore has only been used to deal with threats of subversion, racial and religious extremism (such as inciting racial or religious hatred, strife and violence), espionage and terrorism. These threats continue to be salient today, especially in the last ten years against the threat of terrorism, where the Government's priority is to act swiftly to prevent an attack from taking place. The arrests made under the ISA in Dec 2001 thwarted the imminent suicide bombings against establishments in Singapore that were planned by Al-Qaeda operatives assisted by several of the arrested Jemaah Islamiyah members, preventing the loss of innocent lives. The ISA continues to be relevant and crucial as a measure of last resort for the preservation of our national security.
 

Forvendet

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

The ISA in Singapore and Malaysia may have the same roots from the time when both were British colonies, but the two countries and their respective societies have evolved differently over time.

Malaysia has denied ever being a British colony. :wink:
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

How can you believe anything from MHA when their former minister WKS said, 'Singapore has a long coastline.'
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Tan Jee Say, do you read this?
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

I wonder what Dr Lim Hock Siew will now say?
And for that matter, TT.
He challenged TT in a video to state categorically that he (and people like Ho Kwong Pin) were terrorists.
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Incredulous...
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Sound like saying "Mee Siam Mai Hum", and yes, Singapore has a "long coastline" like no others and we cannot stop illegal immigrants swimming into our shore. No forgetting our blood happened only once in fifty years too.
 

Forvendet

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Sound like saying "Mee Siam Mai Hum", and yes, Singapore has a "long coastline" like no others and we cannot stop illegal immigrants swimming into our shore. No forgetting our blood happened only once in fifty years too.

How about terrorists swimming out of our shores? Huh?

That's the problem with anti-PAP Singaporeans. Just anti-PAP without a cause. When MSK was detained, all were chanting anti-ISD. When MSK escaped, why didn't anyone chant MSK escape is escape to justice and freedom? No, you all chanted anti-ISD again for his escape, thereby contradicting yourselves and conceding that he should have been detained, the very act that you were all chanting against before his detention. And after MSK was arrested in Malaysia and repatriated to Singapore, you're all chanting abolishing ISD and release MSK.

It looks a complicated labyrinth, but it's simple to see through to one who's discerning. All those chanting left and right don't give a damn about ISD or MSK, probably don't know nuts about them too. They're just anti-PAP.
 

bhoven

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Ministry of Home Affairs press statement on the ISA
06:44 PM Sep 16, 2011The Government notes the announcement by Malaysia that it will be replacing its Internal Security Act (ISA) with new legislation aimed at preventing "subversive action, organised violence and criminal acts".

The ISA in Singapore and Malaysia may have the same roots from the time when both were British colonies, but the two countries and their respective societies have evolved differently over time. Accordingly, the ISA in Singapore has evolved and is now different from that in Malaysia. A person arrested under the ISA in Singapore may be held in custody for up to 30 days after which an Order of Detention or Restriction Order must be issued or else the person must be released unconditionally. In Malaysia, the period of custody is up to 60 days. Also, under the Singapore ISA, since 1991, the President has the power to veto the Government's decision to detain a detainee if the ISA Advisory Board, which is chaired by a Supreme Court Judge, has recommended the release of the detainee. This was an additional safeguard enacted by the Singapore Government to prevent misuse of the Act.

The Singapore Government has used the ISA sparingly. The ISA has only been used against individuals who have acted in a manner prejudicial to the security of Singapore or to the maintenance of public order or essential services therein. No person has ever been detained only for their political beliefs.

The ISA in Singapore has only been used to deal with threats of subversion, racial and religious extremism (such as inciting racial or religious hatred, strife and violence), espionage and terrorism. These threats continue to be salient today, especially in the last ten years against the threat of terrorism, where the Government's priority is to act swiftly to prevent an attack from taking place. The arrests made under the ISA in Dec 2001 thwarted the imminent suicide bombings against establishments in Singapore that were planned by Al-Qaeda operatives assisted by several of the arrested Jemaah Islamiyah members, preventing the loss of innocent lives. The ISA continues to be relevant and crucial as a measure of last resort for the preservation of our national security.

Reading between the lines...they will not follow Malaysia in repealing the Act.
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

Your example of MSK's escape is very apt. Despite all the claims by MHA, the ISA and ISD did not keep Singapore safe - they allowed a suspected terrorist to escape.

Do I want MSK detained. NO. I want him jailed, after a trial. Surely if MSK had indeed been such a danger, our criminal legislation should have put him away for at least a good number of years. And if the current criminal code is insufficient to deal with terrorism, write some, but always give the discretion to the judiciary, and not bypass them.

How about terrorists swimming out of our shores? Huh?

That's the problem with anti-PAP Singaporeans. Just anti-PAP without a cause. When MSK was detained, all were chanting anti-ISD. When MSK escaped, why didn't anyone chant MSK escape is escape to justice and freedom? No, you all chanted anti-ISD again for his escape, thereby contradicting yourselves and conceding that he should have been detained, the very act that you were all chanting against before his detention. And after MSK was arrested in Malaysia and repatriated to Singapore, you're all chanting abolishing ISD and release MSK.

It looks a complicated labyrinth, but it's simple to see through to one who's discerning. All those chanting left and right don't give a damn about ISD or MSK, probably don't know nuts about them too. They're just anti-PAP.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: MHA/PAP: No person has ever been detained under ISA only for their political beli

The ISA continues to be relevant and crucial as a measure of last resort for the preservation of our national security.

Little Emperor Jr has confirmed that he is nothing but a dishonest liar.

The good thing to come out of this is that Singaporeans now know what Little Emperor Jr means when he uses the term "seriously consider".

It means "seriously consider" can be completed in less than 24 hours without the need for Parliament being convened or without Parliament or his Cabinet debating the issue.
 
Top