[Letter to Today] NS a duty, not a job — thus no ‘salary’: Mindef
NS a duty, not a job
NS a duty, not a job
Why did panel decide not to raise NS allowance?
Richmond Lee
Published: June 12, 4:04 AM
I am happy that new conscripts and operationally-ready national servicemen alike will be better rewarded (“Recommendations ‘strengthen NS for future generations’”; June 11).
I wonder, though, why one of the crucial aspects of National Service (NS) that could have been strengthened, which would be to pay NSmen more to better honour them for their time and commitment, was not.
Conscripts, regardless of education level, are now paid S$480 a month during Basic Military Training. Once they graduate from command school as a specialist, they are paid around S$800 a month. The difference compared with a regular specialist with A-Levels or a diploma is about three times, on average. Why was this gap not narrowed?
I suppose all junior commanders start out having equal responsibilities and workloads.
Would increasing the NS allowance not better reflect the contribution of the full-time national serviceman (NSF) and boost his morale?
Raising allowances for all NSFs, though, would cost more to state coffers. To finance this, the Singapore Armed Forces could have considered channelling the portion of money used for catering food to top up allowances.
Assuming a meal costs S$5, lunch and dinner would cost about S$300 monthly for each in-camp NSF.
That extra monthly sum in the hands of NSFs could be better utilised, for instance, for their family’s utility bills and groceries or saved for their tertiary education.
By restricting the cost of cookhouse meals, NSFs could buy from the caterers at a subsidised rate, while regulars could pay the full cost. Having a choice in buying meals may even improve the standards of cookhouse food.
The time, opportunity costs and onerous duties that NSmen undertake to serve and defend Singapore are unquestionable. The onus is perhaps on the policymakers to address whether this good service deserves to be compensated at a better rate.
Why did panel decide not to raise NS allowance? | TODAYonline
Last edited: