• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is this how a free market economy works

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal

Penny stock crash mastermind Soh Chee Wen jailed 36 years​

FMT Reporters
-
December 28, 2022 11:09 AM
facebook sharing button

twitter sharing button

whatsapp sharing button

email sharing button

Soh-Chee-Wen-and-Quah-Su-Ling.jpg


John Soh Chee Wen and Quah Su-Ling were found guilty of running a scheme between August 2012 and October 2013 that wiped out S$8 billion from the market capitalisation of the Singapore stock exchange.
PETALING JAYA: Malaysian businessman John Soh Chee Wen has been sentenced to 36 years in jail in Singapore for masterminding the island republic’s biggest stock market manipulation.
According to a report in The Straits Times, his co-conspirator Quah Su-Ling, was handed 20 years.

The duo were found to have manipulated the share prices of Blumont Group, Asiasons Capital and Lion-Gold Corp — collectively known as BAL — between August 2012 and October 2013, and in the process wiped out nearly S$8 billion (RM27 billion) in the market capitalisation at the end of their spree.
Both are appealing their sentences.
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
1672197542190.png


1672197577158.png

1672197610917.png



https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...ears-ex-girlfriend-quah-su-ling-gets-20-years


.
SINGAPORE - John Soh Chee Wen, the mastermind of Singapore’s biggest case of stock market manipulation that wiped out nearly $8 billion in market value in October 2013, on Wednesday was sentenced to 36 years in jail, while his co-conspirator Quah Su-Ling was handed 20 years.

Both are appealing their sentences.

The court case spanned a record 349 successful charges in some 200 days of trial over nearly four years.

Prosecutors had sought a jail sentence of 40 years for Soh, and 19½ years’ for his co-conspirator Quah.

The pair were found to have manipulated the share prices of Blumont Group, Asiasons Capital and LionGold Corp – known collectively as BAL – between August 2012 and October 2013, through 187 trading accounts held with 20 financial institutions in the names of 58 individuals and companies.

In issuing the sentences on Wednesday, High Court judge Hoo Sheau Peng said: “In terms of the large number of controlled accounts and intermediaries and financial institutions involved, and the substantial volume of BAL trades and high percentage of whole market’s trading volume, ... the accused are to be held responsible for most of the trades.”

In deciding Quah’s sentence, Judge Hoo said: “ In my view, there is no dispute that Quah is less culpable, and she is less involved in terms of the scheme’s conceptualisation and execution. ... As a starting point for the false trading and price manipulation charges, I will impose on Quah two-thirds of the sentence imposed on Soh.”

Judge Hoo added: “The accused perpertrated the scheme on a substantial scale ....They were armed with a good understanding of financial markets and exploited the system for a prolonged period of 14 months. They did so for financial gain. By the time of the market crash and even after their scheme failed, they continued to subvert justice.

“It is necessary and of utmost importance for the global sentences to be imposed on the accused to capture the gravity of their wrongdoing.”

Soh, 63, has been in remand since November 2016, while Quah, 58, the former chief executive of Ipco (now renamed Renaissance United), is out on bail of $4 million.


Of the 180 charges on which Soh was convicted, prosecutors sought consecutive sentences for 11 charges (three of false trading, three deception charges, two cheating charges and three tampering charges) and an aggregate sentence of 40 years’ jail.

For Quah, who was convicted on 169 charges, the prosecution sought consecutive sentences for six charges (two false trading charges, three deception charges and one cheating charge), and an aggregate sentence of 19½ years’ jail.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicholas Tan in a November hearing likened the near $8 billion loss in market capitalisation resulting from the penny stock crash to “the equivalent of wiping out the market capitalisation of 33 Pan-Electric Industries (Pan-El)”.

The collapse of Pan-El in 1985, which had a market cap of $230 million, resulted in the closure of the Singapore and Malaysian stock exchanges for three days in order to contain the fallout on heavily leveraged stockbroking firms.

But Soh’s defence lawyer, Senior Counsel N. Sreenivasan, had argued that in the aftermath of the penny stock crash, “the market was not closed... and no financial institution went down”.

He said that Soh and Quah were not the only persons involved in the scheme.

Mr Sreenivasan had said that for the purposes of sentencing, a significant part of the BAL trade volume carried out by prosecution witnesses Leroy Lau, Ken Tai, Henry Tjoa and Gabriel Gan should not be attributed to Soh and Quah.

“Their sentences cannot be such that they are the scapegoats for the wrongs of others,” he said.

In asking for a sentence of between seven and 13 years for Soh, Mr Sreenivasan had said: “In the final analysis, the present case is no Pan-El or Barings/Nick Leeson, and the sentence cannot be anything close to the 40 years that is being sought.”
 
Last edited:

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
At the end of the day, it was never about selling a product or service... it's about selling hopes and dreams, working on the fear and/or vanity of your audience. :wink:

He should have become a pastor of a megachurch. :biggrin:

1200x-1.jpg
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
It the same is it not? :o-o:
hardly sir mojito.

a common confusion that most of the world also shares.

free market means operating without undue constraints or central oversight. e.g. people plant whatever vegetables and sell whatever people want to buy. in a centrally planned market, gahmen decides what to plant and what the customer gets to buy.

most economies you are familiar with are free markets. The centrally planned ones are shitholes nobody buys anything from or sells anything to. China, Russia and Vietnam in the 60s and N Korea today.

free-for-all markets are typified by today's Hong Kong and US and even Russia. These have undue influence from gangsters or cartels which own most of the productive resources and therefore a monopoly. When most people complain about capitalism, they're complaining about monopolistic capitalism where the consumer is a bitch to powerful interests. Singapore property market is another good example.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
hardly sir mojito.

a common confusion that most of the world also shares.

free market means operating without undue constraints or central oversight. e.g. people plant whatever vegetables and sell whatever people want to buy. in a centrally planned market, gahmen decides what to plant and what the customer gets to buy.

most economies you are familiar with are free markets. The centrally planned ones are shitholes nobody buys anything from or sells anything to. China, Russia and Vietnam in the 60s and N Korea today.

free-for-all markets are typified by today's Hong Kong and US and even Russia. These have undue influence from gangsters or cartels which own most of the productive resources and therefore a monopoly. When most people complain about capitalism, they're complaining about monopolistic capitalism where the consumer is a bitch to powerful interests. Singapore property market is another good example.
Seems to me the end state of free markets is "free for all" market, by your definition. :cautious:
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
hardly sir mojito.

a common confusion that most of the world also shares.

free market means operating without undue constraints or central oversight. e.g. people plant whatever vegetables and sell whatever people want to buy. in a centrally planned market, gahmen decides what to plant and what the customer gets to buy.

most economies you are familiar with are free markets. The centrally planned ones are shitholes nobody buys anything from or sells anything to. China, Russia and Vietnam in the 60s and N Korea today.

free-for-all markets are typified by today's Hong Kong and US and even Russia. These have undue influence from gangsters or cartels which own most of the productive resources and therefore a monopoly. When most people complain about capitalism, they're complaining about monopolistic capitalism where the consumer is a bitch to powerful interests. Singapore property market is another good example.

change the name from your stupid one then.

free market = free market. if you use term free market but mean sth else, fault lies with you, not that ceca ahneh @syedputra impostor pretending to be melayun.
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seems to me the end state of free markets is "free for all" market, by your definition. :cautious:
that is not true for just free markets. All markets whether centrally planned or free market tend to free for all. It's the nature of humanity.

It's just that in a free market, the difference is obvious and shocking and rightfully worthy of scorn. In centrally planned markets, they are not obvious and nobody can see, talk or do about it. Go see North Korea for an example.
 
Top