He doesn't irritate me either. In fact, I'd say the majority of Singaporeans find GMS to be very knowledgeable and very credible.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Is GMS our de facto Political Guru
- Thread starter steffychun
- Start date
He doesn't irritate me either. In fact, I'd say the majority of Singaporeans find GMS to be very knowledgeable and very credible.
he is the de farkto political kuku..........
Your message is wrong on so many levels.
Firstly you don't have the influence to impact the political outcome of any party, whether PAP or opposition. In a word, you are irrelevant.
Secondly, you claim your role is to provide info and commentary, but in reality the past 1,000 postings have been criticism of WP, and in many cases outright smearing.
Thirdly, life is about taking sides. A fence sitter does not participate, does not contribute. You have to take sides eventually. So you're telling me practically everyone will find you irritating at some point? Well THAT I can definitely agree.
Firstly you don't have the influence to impact the political outcome of any party, whether PAP or opposition. In a word, you are irrelevant.
Secondly, you claim your role is to provide info and commentary, but in reality the past 1,000 postings have been criticism of WP, and in many cases outright smearing.
Thirdly, life is about taking sides. A fence sitter does not participate, does not contribute. You have to take sides eventually. So you're telling me practically everyone will find you irritating at some point? Well THAT I can definitely agree.
I agree. And Zeng G.Y. would definitely agree that GMS is "friendly, understanding, caring and kind".
BTW what this thing about prof? He got Ph.D. huh?
This I defnitely agree. Guess I've to choose a side soon. Just have to choose the right side
hahaha.....gms is the wisest man in this forum....better than the cockeral.
if i see him....i will kneel before him and call him GOD....Canon God.....not GMS.
if i see him....i will kneel before him and call him GOD....Canon God.....not GMS.
Last edited:
Bro TFBH, I'm not too sure where he got his so called Ph.D..
Kinana is a regular patient at his acupuncture clinic.. Maybe Kinana knows where Prof Zeng obtained his Ph.D..
You learn more from failure than you do from success.
CSJ, GMS and Gopalan Nair are trapped in a burning building. Who would be able to get out?
Because these are NOT mistakes to him. For example, he may have lost Marine Parade GRC, but to him, that's a great victory. It is a psychological victory. A moral victory. A symbolic victory. This victory is a milestone in local opposition politics. Most of us are not smart enough to understand the significance of that victory. We've very narrow definition of win and loss.
We're quite pathetic. According to GMS.
GMS can never be called a political analyst or gooroo because his intent is pretty obvious.
Like a pussy he rant and rant non-stop about WP like a woman scorned. Whoever that consider him a guru must be an idiot.
Like a pussy he rant and rant non-stop about WP like a woman scorned. Whoever that consider him a guru must be an idiot.
You do rant like a woman scorned bro.
Let me try. None? Coz all 3 will continue to argue even if it means getting 100% burnt!
Disagreed. Goh Meng Seng did not even won 1 seats in the parliament. So therefore there is nothing to learn from a BIG FAILURE.
I have taken side, but am not irritated by you. There are people with far more calibre than you writing against the PAP. Even MBT, whom you stood against, has far more intellect and appeal than you can ever have. If you are not on the PAP payroll, I can see the elites sniggering at your stupidity.
Rather than irritation, I'm amused by you. The same way a king is amused by his court jester. You are just a more bitter, less funny, less successful and far uglier version of Harban Singh.
The big mystery is not you, but why people choose to engage you continually and even start threads about you, when other clowns are ignored. Perhaps it's because you are the biggest clown of them all and therefore draw all the attention?
Similar threads
