It's as clear as daylight. The bunch of Sore Losers in this forum are highly jealous and cannot accept that the 70% are not in syn with them and will bash all forumers who talks or posts in favor of the PAP. Even SAM gets similarly bashed at times. It's more like becoming a cult in this bloody forum where every member must talk in tandem with those Sore Losers, otherwise, will immediately gets bashed at the next follow up posting with vulgarities thrown in as well. Even the moderator joins and acts in this same manner, although he's slightly less harsh. Those bloody Sore Losers in this forum indeed have inferior personalities. They are the sick ones and cannot take anyone who is better than them or not in syn with their PAP bashing.
Take the case of the boy falling from the ledge in Orchard Central. One had claimed that places in Singapore are getting more dangerous in recent times than before, but how can this be true when there are even more serious case during the Hotel New World's collapse back in 1986? It's totally nonsensical and unfair to say that the situation had warranted such a badmouthing without any due responsibility in what they spew. It's because of their very biased view and their motive is just to badmouth the government for everything that's done (whether good or bad) and would just want to see the downfall of Singapore. Only then will they be satisfied. And he can even prohibit the discussion of moral responsibilities for NS evaders. If this is the way to debate, there's nothing more to say. Even if the NS evaders are from the elites, they must be equally condemned, why don't bring up on moral issues? Because for that particular case of NS evaders which had involved their relatives or friends, they know themselves very well that they'll have no means to defend if the moral aspect will be brought up to debate upon.