-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
George Yeo and China decline to comment on Philip Chan spy saga
- Thread starter ChinaCommunistSG
- Start date
Straits Times suddenly grow 2 balls and have the courage to ask China for comment
BEIJING - China’s Foreign Ministry has declined to comment on the case of Singaporean businessman Philip Chan, citing non-interference in the domestic affairs of another country.
Mr Chan, 59, a naturalised Singaporean born in Hong Kong, was served notice on Feb 2 of the Singapore authorities’ intention to designate him as a politically significant person under the Republic’s foreign interference laws.
In response to a query from The Straits Times, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Feb 5 that Mr Chan, as president of the Hong Kong Singapore Business Association, has contributed to the promotion of cooperation between Hong Kong and Singapore.
Mr Chan, 59, a naturalised Singaporean born in Hong Kong, was served notice on Feb 2 of the Singapore authorities’ intention to designate him as a politically significant person under the Republic’s foreign interference laws.
In response to a query from The Straits Times, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Feb 5 that Mr Chan, as president of the Hong Kong Singapore Business Association, has contributed to the promotion of cooperation between Hong Kong and Singapore.
tip of iceberg. finally isd and sid are doing their jobs. must bring out more ccp moles and spies to shame.
All these wayang.
As if we all don't know that PAP is no different from CCCP.
As if we all don't know that PAP is no different from CCCP.
It's not a problem if the Singapore government strips the naturalized citizen of Singapore citizenship.
He can apply to restore his Chinese citizenship.
He can apply to restore his Chinese citizenship.
he already has an honorary ccp shitizenship, just not declared. if he fails to declare but is found out he will be charged for failure to declare to registrar under new law.
Similar threads
