hahaha....since everybody else fails to understand what is writen in wiki and u are the only 1 who can interprete and re-educating not only Singaporean but the whole world, why don't u take it up with papee.....don't let other pple steal your thunder....Tks to pple like kukubird to help me educate, no, re-educate Singaporeans on our history and on our cheap skate power desperado Old man's antics during the 16 day independence ra-ra.
I would not worry too much.
This will actually confuse the PAP and certainly will force zeros not to step into the ring. In the final hour to Nomination day, their will be withdrawals and common sense will prevail. There will always be clowns such as Desmond, Harbans etc that are part of the elections furniture and this is no different to any other country.
I am sure the SCM going to fly the flag of opposition disunity to allow the PAP to know who the actual candidate is so that they can target their campaign more accurately and do the character assassination homework.
Both Chiam, JBJ and Harbans declared their intention to contest Anson BE. People were worried but Chiam withdrew at the 11th hour.
I hope VW stands for SDP as WP has no credible or proven material and I am sure they want to preserve their firepower for East Coast as they have been working real hard. KJ can go fuck himself.
hahaha....since everybody else fails to understand what is writen in wiki and u are the only 1 who can interprete and re-educating not only Singaporean but the whole world, why don't u take it up with papee.....don't let other pple steal your thunder....
if the cleaner aunty can do it, surely u can do better than just ranting in SBF.....
let me give u some tips.....do it as matter of seeking clarifications like the cleaner aunty......should be ok.
but not in a defamatory style otherwise u may lose your pants..
it is ok to insult kukubird but definitely unacceptable to insult the intelligence of all singporean and academics/historians of the whole world.
So pse do so or stop your rambling nonsence insulting the intelligence ALL singaporean......better just stick to PLP scroobal.
hahaha......u are the 1 who is biggest cock around.I'm really taking a lot of pleasure here to show up the blurfuck around here with his non-stop kukuing...empty vessels make the most noise. Let's see how he still twists and turns..like a worm.
http://countrystudies.us/singapore/10.htm
"Singapore as Part of Malaysia
The leaders of Singapore, Malaya, Sabah, and Sarawak signed the Malaysia Agreement on July 9, 1963, under which the Federation of Malaysia was scheduled to come into being on August 31. Tengku Abdul Rahman changed the date to September 16, however, to allow the UN time to complete its survey. On August 31, Lee declared Singapore to be independent with the PAP government to act as trustees for fifteen days until the formation of Malaysia on September 16."
hahaha......u are the 1 who is biggest cock around.
kukubird is not a historian....
but to think that u know better than all the academics/historians in the world in interpreting Modern Singapore History is really too much.
so far no sane pple has challenged the fact that Singapore officially attained indepedence status as sovereign country on 9/8/1965.
all the info u highlighted are from open literature and u think only u know how to read and interprete...better than all the academic/historians in the world.
u are the biggest joke in town in your blind pursuit to bring down kukubird.
All this debate on when Singapore achieved independence is comparing apple with orange. Are we talking about independence from the British or independence from Malaysia? If the former, then Malaysia, the state of Pahang and Singapore all obtained independence from the British in 1961, basically when we all stopped singing God Save the Queen and started singing Negara Ku. If it is independence from Malaysia and becoming a Republic, it is in 1965. So it is all a matter of definition. Just sit down and define the terms of reference of the debate.
hahaha......still want to be ge kiang.....
http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Page/straitstimes19630901-1.1.1.aspx
hahaha.........i put up the link is not fun.....why don't u read and try to understand the contents before shooting your mouth off as usual.....lol.Tks for validating the truth. Look at the extremem right column - Lee: We are free!
The ST is dated 1 Sep 1963 so he was referring to 31 August 1963, when he crowed that. You settled yr own doubts.
Talk with facts. You are really ge kiang and now shot yr own mouth.
hahaha.........i put up the link is not fun.....why don't u read and try to understand the contents before shooting your mouth off as usual.....lol.
hahaha....it is precisely pple like u who cannot read beyond the headlines and have zero cow sense that there is so much mis-information in SBF.You are just an ignoramus and a blabbermouth. The link I quoted from you showed clearly and supported what I wrote, yet you tried to snake out of it. No point continuing with you since you are a snake and lack objectivity and fact-based evidence. Just a waste of time. Why do I bother to convince you? Carry on yr blissful life of ignorance and darkness, you blurfuck.
hahaha....u really have a thick matched only by my idol, scroobal and good for twisting and turning.
all the evidences and facts are here.....
Any time, if I am proven wrong in what i have interpreted.....i will stop posting in SBF....
how about you Mr/Ms Kingrant???
hahaha...true to charactor, u twists and turn again...With yr admission that it is a de facto independence, we have come full circle. I was proven right all along.The one with comprehension problems is you. Go back and reread yr posts. It is precisely becos it was de facto that I said the cockerel couldnt wait 16 days before he had to crow. What was all that about you think? Right, all the evidences were there - even those you supplied kicked you in the ass.
You can stop posting in SBF right now. Shot yrself in the foot again. dont bother to waste time replying. What a blurfuck and a twister!