• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat FB is exposed to be a Malware-like desperate crook deceptively modify your Android

cunt_opener

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.engadget.com/2016/06/20/facebook-messenger-sms-push-might-break-android-rules/



Facebook Messenger's SMS push might break Android app rules (updated)
The company's aggressive text messaging tie-in appears to run afoul of Google Play guidelines.




Did you think Facebook was a little too eager to have you using Messenger for SMS on your Android phone? You're not alone. Concerns are mounting that Facebook's SMS prompt might violate Google Play's policies prohibiting deceptive device settings changes. You see, the prompt offering to switch SMS to Messenger offers only a big "OK" button and a tiny "settings" button -- there's no obvious way to decline the change. You can, of course, but it's buried.

We've asked both Facebook and Google for their stances on the app and will let you know what they say. Whatever their reactions, though, it's not surprising why Facebook would push so hard. The more you use Messenger for your chats, the more likely it is that you'll use Messenger for purchases and other services that might help Facebook's bottom line. It's just a question of whether or not the social network is being completely honest with users who don't realize that SMS integration is strictly optional.

Update: In a statement, Facebook tells us that it's still being fair. You go to "settings" (as expected) to decide against using Messenger for SMS, and you'll get a permissions request before the change happens. That's important, but the concern is more that Facebook doesn't have a conspicuous "no" or "skip" option that makes it clear this integration isn't mandatory. You can read the full statement below.

"SMS in Messenger is an optional feature. People can choose whether or not they wish to use it. When they first see the prompt, they can choose to start seeing their SMS messages in Messenger by turning on the feature, or they can decide not to by tapping "Settings." If they decide to see SMS messages in Messenger and to also reply to messages from Messenger, we'll ask people to approve any new device permissions that are required. Messenger doesn't modify any device settings without people agreeing to it."

VERY aggressive prompt by Facebook to add SMS to @messenger. Ain't no "No" button. A violation of Google Play rules? pic.twitter.com/7tZzAE5MGh
— Amir Efrati (@amir) June 20, 2016

Source: Amir Efrati (Twitter), Google Play
In this ar
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: FB is exposed to be a Malware-like desperate crook deceptively modify your Androi

https://www.engadget.com/2016/06/20/facebook-messenger-sms-push-might-break-android-rules/

Facebook Messenger's SMS push might break Android app rules (updated)
The company's aggressive text messaging tie-in appears to run afoul of Google Play guidelines.

Did you think Facebook was a little too eager to have you using Messenger for SMS on your Android phone? You're not alone. Concerns are mounting that Facebook's SMS prompt might violate Google Play's policies prohibiting deceptive device settings changes. You see, the prompt offering to switch SMS to Messenger offers only a big "OK" button and a tiny "settings" button -- there's no obvious way to decline the change. You can, of course, but it's buried.

We've asked both Facebook and Google for their stances on the app and will let you know what they say. Whatever their reactions, though, it's not surprising why Facebook would push so hard. The more you use Messenger for your chats, the more likely it is that you'll use Messenger for purchases and other services that might help Facebook's bottom line. It's just a question of whether or not the social network is being completely honest with users who don't realize that SMS integration is strictly optional.

Update: In a statement, Facebook tells us that it's still being fair. You go to "settings" (as expected) to decide against using Messenger for SMS, and you'll get a permissions request before the change happens. That's important, but the concern is more that Facebook doesn't have a conspicuous "no" or "skip" option that makes it clear this integration isn't mandatory. You can read the full statement below.

"SMS in Messenger is an optional feature. People can choose whether or not they wish to use it. When they first see the prompt, they can choose to start seeing their SMS messages in Messenger by turning on the feature, or they can decide not to by tapping "Settings." If they decide to see SMS messages in Messenger and to also reply to messages from Messenger, we'll ask people to approve any new device permissions that are required. Messenger doesn't modify any device settings without people agreeing to it."

VERY aggressive prompt by Facebook to add SMS to @messenger. Ain't no "No" button. A violation of Google Play rules? pic.twitter.com/7tZzAE5MGh
— Amir Efrati (@amir) June 20, 2016

Source: Amir Efrati (Twitter), Google Play
In this ar

cum to think of it... suckerberg does have the same traits like trump. they both love china.

they are both suckup face, arrogant and white trash.
 
Top