I was wondering for the longest time does QAF stands for. Now I know. Quality Assurance Framework (QAF) and they own the Gardenia bread brand and listed on SGX.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Excellent Article on Bin Centre - Caught lying again
- Thread starter scroobal
- Start date
I was wondering for the longest time does QAF stands for. Now I know. Quality Assurance Framework (QAF) and they own the Gardenia bread brand and listed on SGX.
That is s different QAF bro!....that QAF is halal company....don't get mixed up!...the one that is listed on the stock exchange....this QAF stands for quiet & faithful....means, when ask, act blur!...shhhh!!
$880,000 for a bin centre...certainly worth the while to pay a visit and have a look at this extra-ordinary bin centre.
Wii recommend to tourist and friends to have a look at probably the world most expensive bin centre.
Thank for the publicity and many will visit the Asian civilisation museum.
Maybe when i am there i can see clearly and learn a thing or two about corruption, if any..
Wii recommend to tourist and friends to have a look at probably the world most expensive bin centre.
Thank for the publicity and many will visit the Asian civilisation museum.
Maybe when i am there i can see clearly and learn a thing or two about corruption, if any..
Queer Arse Farking.... the right term ro use
Her Bra, Panties and Lingerie must be frm Victoria Secret Collection, she has expensive taste.
likedatosocanmeh
PAP groupthink will doom Singapore
20160730 Think AGO report is not a wayang? Think again
July 30, 2016
Poor/no oversight, weak governance, financial and procedural lapses, overspending on consultancy fee, investing $50 million without proper approval, etc have been uncovered by the latest AGO audit.
These massive lapses have resulted in at least tens of millions in tax dollar losses and social media has been set on fire with citizens screaming for some accountability. However, those who are expecting the PAP leopard to change its spots will again be sorely disappointed.
We need to look no further than last year’s damning AGO report on PA where NO civil servants were held accountable; all PA had to do was take action to rectify lapses which included 10 years of omissions in financial statements submissions.
If the PAP government felt it right not to hold anyone accountable in very serious lapses like the Mas Selamat escape, why should it do so for those highlighted in the AGO report?
Few really expected the aristocratic head of Wong Kan Seng to roll but he should not have added insult to injury by equating his apology (mere words) to taking responsibility.
Wong Kan Seng said he took responsibility for the Mas Selamat escape because he said sorry. link
(Then-director of ISD director Pang Kin Keong said he had felt like “slumping and going back to bed, under the covers” for the major lapse under his watch. Any responsible leader would have committed hara kiri but Pang had wanted to hide in bed under his blanket. Pang is now the Perm Sec (MOT) and earning more tax dollars than when he was ISD director. Got accountability meh?)
PAP’s “accountability” = no accountability/say sorry OK leow. Holding no one accountable for lapses has been the norm under the PAP.
AGO Willie Tan (2015 report): “The audits give assurance to the President and Parliament on the proper accounting management and use of public resources. In the process, they strengthen the accountability of public sector entities as custodians and stewards of public resources.” Question for SAF Scholar AG Willie Tan:
Are you kidding or what? When there is no disincentive for downright incompetence, will civil servants ever understand the meaning of accountability? Will they not continue screwing up?
Everyone knows the entire civil service is controlled by PAP. Truth be said, the AGO report merely gives a semblance of transparency and accountability to foreigners and gullible members of the public.
Coming on the heels of other issues, e.g. MOT’s and LTA’s transparency and accountability issue exposed by FactWire, grassroots members given preferential treatment at the Woodlands Checkpoint, etc, the AGO report has proven to be a useful tool to distract the public.
But wasn’t the report vetted by PAP before publication and would PAP allow its own report to lead to consequences beyond its control?
Our collective calls for accountability have given us a false sense of empowerment. At the end of the day, events will pan out according to PAP’s script.
Singaporeans should not be distracted by the AGO report which is essentially nothing more than another wayang.
PAP groupthink will doom Singapore
20160730 Think AGO report is not a wayang? Think again
July 30, 2016
Poor/no oversight, weak governance, financial and procedural lapses, overspending on consultancy fee, investing $50 million without proper approval, etc have been uncovered by the latest AGO audit.
These massive lapses have resulted in at least tens of millions in tax dollar losses and social media has been set on fire with citizens screaming for some accountability. However, those who are expecting the PAP leopard to change its spots will again be sorely disappointed.
We need to look no further than last year’s damning AGO report on PA where NO civil servants were held accountable; all PA had to do was take action to rectify lapses which included 10 years of omissions in financial statements submissions.
If the PAP government felt it right not to hold anyone accountable in very serious lapses like the Mas Selamat escape, why should it do so for those highlighted in the AGO report?
Few really expected the aristocratic head of Wong Kan Seng to roll but he should not have added insult to injury by equating his apology (mere words) to taking responsibility.
Wong Kan Seng said he took responsibility for the Mas Selamat escape because he said sorry. link
(Then-director of ISD director Pang Kin Keong said he had felt like “slumping and going back to bed, under the covers” for the major lapse under his watch. Any responsible leader would have committed hara kiri but Pang had wanted to hide in bed under his blanket. Pang is now the Perm Sec (MOT) and earning more tax dollars than when he was ISD director. Got accountability meh?)
PAP’s “accountability” = no accountability/say sorry OK leow. Holding no one accountable for lapses has been the norm under the PAP.
AGO Willie Tan (2015 report): “The audits give assurance to the President and Parliament on the proper accounting management and use of public resources. In the process, they strengthen the accountability of public sector entities as custodians and stewards of public resources.” Question for SAF Scholar AG Willie Tan:
Are you kidding or what? When there is no disincentive for downright incompetence, will civil servants ever understand the meaning of accountability? Will they not continue screwing up?
Everyone knows the entire civil service is controlled by PAP. Truth be said, the AGO report merely gives a semblance of transparency and accountability to foreigners and gullible members of the public.
Coming on the heels of other issues, e.g. MOT’s and LTA’s transparency and accountability issue exposed by FactWire, grassroots members given preferential treatment at the Woodlands Checkpoint, etc, the AGO report has proven to be a useful tool to distract the public.
But wasn’t the report vetted by PAP before publication and would PAP allow its own report to lead to consequences beyond its control?
Our collective calls for accountability have given us a false sense of empowerment. At the end of the day, events will pan out according to PAP’s script.
Singaporeans should not be distracted by the AGO report which is essentially nothing more than another wayang.
Last edited:
You give 70% mandate you expect accountability?
