The past is an indication of the future, and it's a relevant consideration. What business do you have to comment on another man's preference for a virgin woman as wife ? It's a preference, just as some men prefer women who have big boobs.
Men are divided into two camps whenever the issue concerns virginity of the prospective wife. However, men are almost always in agreement when the issue concerns fat and ugly women - men will not accuse one another for being, to borrow your description, narrow-minded, if they exhibit preference for good-looking women, be it face or figure. It goes to show that being fat or ugly is a greater sin than losing your virginity to a man other than your husband before marriage.
If men see themselves as being the "norm" as opposed to narrow-minded by accepting women who have had sex with other men prior to marriage, it's a preference in its own right. But the same men must not complain that women are fucking around because it's men who unwittingly unleashed the women from their moral shackles.
The man who prefers to have a virgin woman as wife often keeps to himself and makes no effort to impose his moral values on other men. It's often men who are stuck with a "used" wife who will seek to "convert" men who expressed preference for a virgin woman as wife by way of derision. The former probably feels the weight of the unseen moral prosecution and seeks to alleviate his guilty conscience by tweaking the moral compass, so that what is morally entrenched becomes socially disdained.
Good attempt, bro.
