• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

David & Wendy

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
This was not just election rhetoric, she really meant it. :biggrin:

thank for pointing out the obvious, some lowlife toilet jagas who spent their lifes monitoring shit and urine may not have see the obvious.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
thank for pointing out the obvious, some lowlife toilet jagas who spent their lifes monitoring shit and urine may not have see the obvious.

thank for stating the obvious, if you can't be a tua pao xian, the next best thing is to make motherhood statements. :wink:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
great post again, sis. keep writing. english lessons for me.

Afternoon Blackie. I am just an ordinary girl next door. English was never my forte.

While I do enjoy writing, I prefer to read (more than write). Reading enlightens my mind while writing is merely for putting my thoughts in tangible words.

Enjoy your Sunday as more than half of it is over. :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hello [Claire],

Several months ago, when you first started to post, I was concerned for you, including your intimate bf being a smoker, and his various relationships.

After reading your most recent "continuing saga", and this
"First, he cheated on Wendy. Second, he dumped Saseko. Third, he went on with a few other women, like Cocotte. Fourth, he can always make a fresh will and CPF nomination, disposing me altogether. Last but not least, I gave in to him yet again. Arghhh! I think I am getting paranoid from what I read on the public saga now."

With respect, I believe that he has all the financial resources to charm any younger woman (say mid 30's and better).

Accordingly, with your "weaker heart" and "weaker brain (vis-a-vis") relationship with man or men" (but not brain in terms of your professional life), may I suggest that you should re-evaluate.

Have a Blessed Sunday (still Saturday evening for me), but lose an hour because we are switching to Eastern Daylight Savings Time at 0100 hours to 0200 hours.

Afternoon Charlie :smile: Always nice to have you giving me pointers. I appreciate them. I guess I need to have a stronger heart and brain. In fact, writing in this forum has helped me a great deal in crystallising my thoughts as I pen them out methodically. Thanks once again for your TLC :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
fuck!! and I thot all along Claire is for real

Hi Long :smile: You sound really unintelligible. I am not sure what you are mumbling about. Do have a late afternoon coffee and collect your thoughts together. That's what I do when I find myself having a "dead brain".

The caffeine usually jumpstarts my cerebellum and I will be fine thereafter. Have a great evening ahead :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
Claire, you wear your heart on your sleeve. :wink:

Hello Panda! :smile: I only do it here (or otherwise with Sue).

It’s anonymous here and I am just making use of this resource, as a sounding board for my chaotic and muddled thoughts :smile: In fact, I have made valuable companionship here with many (like brother eat, Charlie, big, yourself and many more). Thanks :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
kanina

saseko is japanese slang for prostitute.
first cocotte, now saseko, what's next?
your cock must be damn itchy :rolleyes:

kanina

Hi Kan :smile: I am glad you are reading what I have been writing to date and even remembering names that I use in my pieces. Saseko and Cocotte are mere co-incidences.

Usually when I pen my pieces, such pseudo names come to me instinctively. I do not invent these names. I am really sorry that you are offended. My apologies. :smile:

And ~ No, I do not have a long urethra track (like you). Have a nice day :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
dear sister and good evening. there's no relationship that is perfect or ever will be.

it's not uncommon for the female to trigger a heartfelt confrontation over any current event or incident, the male to experience a pause of shock and quickly gather a creative story that has worked before to elicit empathy and a softening of the female defenses, and both to come to terms or compromise somewhere in the middle. the middle is never perfect and will never fully reconcile with both sides' ideal or sometimes "extreme" positions.

you seem to uncannily have that philosophy ingrained in your instinct, and you willingly seek out a restive or equilibrium state with him avoiding further conflict even though his sob story is not as lovely as sense and sensibility or pride and prejudice. he pulls out the (canned) story you wish to hear, and by not taking it to the weirdest extremity, you accept it openly because deep in you, your otherwise tight filter is listening intuitively for coherence and soothing sound bytes that have already occupied your heart. he is smooth enough to understand what needs to sync with the tune and frequency in you to soften and open that door. he doesn't have to tell the ugly and bitter truth and or perfect story. it will only shake or destroy your inner sanctum and peace between heart and mind. such is the reality of intimate relationships between any two individuals. matrimonial harmony is a matter of care (not to destroy your spirit or his), control of the self (not the other), compromise, and continuity if you decide to have children.

that said, ask him to hand over all his finances and you elevate yourself as cfo after tying the knot. it looks like the marriage is a foregone conclusion. it will never be perfect. but managing all the finances including credit card payments will grant you the book of life and power as everything transacted or spent (including expenses for a getaway with a mistress) may become traceable. it's not about controlling him but about controlling expenses for the long term good of the relationship.....or family. :p he will stray, and you can stray too but with greater economic power and leverage. this swine needs to be tamed and shamed. and thanks for performing that formidable task with your personal sacrifice. we all appreciate. :eek: :wink:

My favourite elder brother. I am yearning for you again as I read your constructive advice (as opposed to the bunch of clowns rioting here, talking loudly, behaving like DOMs, hoping to read some soft porn or uttering obscenities at each other).

I really like your idea of controlling his expenses. Without money, he is probably without his "arms and legs", and I can easily regulate his “movements”, ensuring that he does not become another David. Great idea. Thanks :smile:

By the way, I must confess I am always fascinated by your thinking, reflected in your responses to my “SOS calls”. If only… errr ... I guess some words are better left unspoken.

Thanks once again. XOXOXO :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am glad GD, a keen English learner and Charlie99, a kind English teacher, have an interest in this thread. I'm going to take this opportunity to learn English from some of the better English speakers in this forum.

Sakedo demanded that he divorce or divorced ? This is something that has always confused me - subjunctive mood and verb tense. My understanding, and correct me if I am wrong, is that the tense of indicative verb (demanded) can change but not the subjunctive verb indicating the imagined action (divorce).

Isn't this a reported speech ? Except for universal truth (the earth is a sphere and lizard is a reptile), shouldn't verbs in a reported speech be expressed in the past tense ?
Good day,
Thank you for the compliment.
I am flattered.
But I believe that [Claire] and [eatshitndie] have a better command of English than I.
In that context of [Claire], it should be divorce not "divorced"

The word you're struggling for, you dumb, … is….."smother".

LOL.

Onit, Charlie and Sherlock, I appreciate all your corrections to my piece today. I can only improve with you guys pointing out my writing errors.

I am still learning. Thank you :smile:
 

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
I give 7 out of 10 for language, 4 for originality as the theme seems common. Keep them coming.

Hello Red :smile: Thanks for your comments. I can only be as original as my real life circumstances permit. I don't think it is easy for a novice like me to be as creative as a movie script writer.

Further, I am neither Joan Collins, nor a fiction writer in the Mills & Boon series, where I can pen about matters that I have not experienced before.

Have a beautiful Sunday evening, as it is pretty cooling now after the rain :smile:
 

rurouni

Alfrescian
Loyal
I'm going to take this opportunity to learn English from some of the better English speakers in this forum.
But I believe that [Claire] and [eatshitndie] have a better command of English than I.
From my observations, it seems to me that among the prolific members of this forum, the ones with the best command of English are eatshitndie and jw5.
attachment.php

Followed by scroobal (and some of his clones). :wink:

I'm afraid "Claire" is certainly ranked below the above three monikers. :o

Leongsam's English is also quite good, but although I'm sure his is not as good as jw5's or eatshitndie's, I'm not sure if his is on the same level as scroobal's or "Claire"'s. :confused:
 

Attachments

  • bow.gif
    bow.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 2,426
Last edited:

Claire

Alfrescian
Loyal
From my observations, it seems to me that among the prolific members of this forum, the ones with the best command of English are eatshitndie and jw5.
Followed by scroobal (and some of his clones). :wink:

I'm afraid "Claire" is certainly ranked below the above three monikers. :o

Leongsam's English is also quite good, but although I'm sure his is not as good as jw5's or eatshitndie's, I'm not sure if his is on the same level as scroobal's or "Claire"'s. :confused:

Hi Ru. I am glad you are not speaking in tongues today. :smile:

In my humble opinion, I believe all the members mentioned in your post (including your goodself) are far better than me in the usage of the English language.

As I said earlier, I am a young novice, merely verbalising my thoughts on what I encounter in my daily life. In fact, I am really thankful that the forum's owner has not "terminated" my membership, given his strong emphasis on proper spelling and good grammar.

Last but not least, I give thanks to those forummers who have treated me with dignity and respect, notwithstanding the fact that I am from the fairer gender.

Have a great Sunday evening :smile:
 

rurouni

Alfrescian
Loyal
...better than me...
learnersdictionary.com/qa/better-than-I-or-better-than-me
"Grammarians have been struggling over "better than I" vs. "better than me" for hundreds of years, and they are not likely to settle the issue anytime soon.

Fortunately, there are two simple rules you can follow that will keep you sounding natural and appropriate to native speakers.

Formal written English: Better than I

In written English, especially in a formal document such as a business letter or a school assignment, most native speakers believe that the subject pronouns I, he, she, we, and they are correct after than. Therefore, if you want to sound educated and correct, it is safer to use “better than I.”

Conversational English: Better than me

In everyday conversation, however, or in text messages and informal emails, most native speakers use the object pronouns me, him, her, us, and them (even if they tell you that they don’t), and if you say “better than I” many people will think that it sounds unnatural and awkward and possibly even pretentious. So in conversation, I recommend that you stick with “better than me.” "



To be honest, my English is not very good. :o
It's only good enough for certain things that I happen to be quite knowledgeable about, i.e. as long as I know enough about something, I'm confident that I'm able to explain it in sufficient detail so that my listener/reader can understand what I'm talking about (as long as they have enough patience to bear with my long-windedness sometimes :o), even if they don't agree with, or don't like, what I'm saying.
 

Charlie99

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Hello Red :smile: Thanks for your comments. I can only be as original as my real life circumstances permit. I don't think it is easy for a novice like me to be as creative as a movie script writer.

Further, I am neither Joan Collins, nor a fiction writer in the Mills & Boon series, where I can pen about matters that I have not experienced before.

Have a beautiful Sunday evening, as it is pretty cooling now after the rain :smile:

May be, should be cool rather than "cooling"
 
Top