• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Cryptocurrencies, tokens, NFTs, virtual "assets" frauds

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore-based crypto fund Three Arrows Capital files for bankruptcy in US​

sv_coins_030722.jpg

Three Arrows Capital is being liquidated after the sharp sell-off in crypto markets. PHOTO: AFP

Jul 3, 2022

BENGALURU (REUTERS, BLOOMBERG) - Crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) is seeking protection from creditors in the United States under Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code, which allows foreign debtors to shield US assets, according to a court filing on Friday (July 1).
Singapore-based 3AC is one of the highest-profile investors hit by the sharp sell-off in crypto markets and is being liquidated, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing a person familiar with the matter.
Representatives for 3AC filed a petition in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on Friday, according to court documents.
On Thursday, Singapore's financial regulator had accused the embattled fund of exceeding its assets threshold and providing false information.
Non-US companies use Chapter 15 to block creditors that want to file lawsuits or tie up assets in the United States.
The meltdown in cryptocurrency deepened in the past week as major players contended with liquidations, withdrawal freezes, trading halts - and, at least in one case, a bailout.


Crypto broker Voyager Digital on Friday announced a suspension of trading, deposits and withdrawals, while BlockFi, a major digital asset lender, won the backing of exchange FTX US with the potential to be acquired. Both companies were upended by the woes of 3AC.

Meanwhile, crypto markets slumped, adding to a decline that has wiped away some US$2 trillion (S$2.8 trillion) of market value.
"I had begun to think that dominoes had stopped falling in mid-June," said Mr Aaron Brown, a crypto investor and Bloomberg Opinion contributor. "I suspect by Tuesday morning, there will be more bad news, although I make no specific predictions."
Much of the industry's recent liquidity issues stem from the troubles at 3AC, which suffered from large losses after making big bullish bets on everything from Bitcoin to Luna, part of the Terra ecosystem whose implosion in May sparked a major market spasm.
Founded in 2012 by former Credit Suisse traders Zhu Su and Kyle Davies, the fund has become emblematic of the industry's excesses during last year's bull run, when it built up leverage that proved destructive when the market turned.
The fuller extent of their impact on the industry is starting to emerge: Blockchain.com and Deribit, a crypto derivatives exchange, this week confirmed that they are among creditors that sought for the liquidation of 3AC.

A spokesman for Blockchain.com said it is cooperating with ongoing investigations into activities by 3AC.
"Crypto is a nascent industry, but intense competition developed amongst service providers vying for the business of a small set of entirely new counterparties," said CoinFund managing partner Alex Felix.
Mr Kyle Samani, co-founder and managing partner at Multicoin Capital, said there is a need for appropriate regulations and transparency, and that an industry coalition should come together to protect retail customers.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore-based crypto lender Vauld suspends withdrawals​

sv_coins_040722.jpg

The crypto industry has been shaken by a series of collapses in recent months. PHOTO: REUTERS

July 4, 2022

SINGAPORE (REUTERS) - Singapore-based crypto lending and trading platform Vauld said on Monday (July 4) that it would suspend withdrawals and trading, and seek new investors, the latest sign of stress in the embattled crypto industry.
Vauld chief executive Darshan Bathija said in a blog post that it was facing "financial challenges" due to "the volatile market conditions, the financial difficulties of our key business partners inevitably affecting us, and the current market climate, which has led to a significant amount of customer withdrawals in excess of a US$197.7 million (S$275.8 million) since June 12".
The crypto industry has been shaken by a series of collapses in recent months, including the failure of so-called stablecoin TerraUSD, large US-based lender Celsius network pausing withdrawals and Singapore-based crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital entering into liquidation.
Crypto lenders have been particularly affected, and crypto exchange FTX has signed a deal with an option to buy embattled crypto lender BlockFi for up to US$240 million, the company said last week.
Bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency, has lost around half its value since early May, and was last trading at just under US$20,000.
Vauld said it had appointed legal and financial advisers, was in discussions with potential investors, and would also apply to the Singapore courts for a moratorium that would have any proceedings against it halted to give it time to carry out a restructuring.
Vauld did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Biggest stablecoin Tether fails to calm jittery nerves with short-sellers circling​

ac_terrausd_040722.jpg

Crypto investors have soured on Tether since the collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in early May. PHOTO: REUTERS


JUL 4, 2022

MUMBAI (BLOOMBERG) - Repeated assurances by the backers of Tether, the biggest stablecoin, that the token is backed by ample reserves and working smoothly have not been enough to reassure markets.
A so-called liquidity pool that allows traders to swap between the three biggest stablecoins still shows an elevated supply of Tether, with the token accounting for 65 per cent of the total as at Friday (July 1). This is an indication that investors remain cautious about holding Tether, said Mr Edul Patel, chief executive of crypto investment platform Mudrex.
Crypto investors have soured on Tether since the collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in early May led to increased scrutiny of the assets. Short-sellers have boosted bets against Tether in the past month, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Monday, citing Mr Leon Marshall, Genesis Global Trading's head of institutional sales.
Tether's market value dropped by about US$600 million (S$837.4 million) this week, bringing declines since just before TerraUSD's implosion to roughly US$17 billion, CoinGecko data shows.
"USDT is the most widely held and most accessible stablecoin in the world, so it is not a surprise that more people hold USDT and have it available to swap for other assets that they want to use for other purposes," a Tether spokesman said in an e-mailed response to questions from Bloomberg. USDT is the ticker for Tether's main United States dollar-based stablecoin.
On Curve's 3pool, where traders can swap between Tether, USDC and DAI, Tether's share of supply stood at 29.9 per cent on May 6, just before TerraUSD started deviating from its peg. This portion jumped as high as 82 per cent on May 12 as the TerraUSD crisis worsened, briefly knocking Tether from its own peg.
While Tether's share of supply has since declined, it remains far above pre-TerraUSD crisis levels, and it has reversed some of the decrease after the WSJ report.

The 3pool platform handled about US$117 million in trading volume on Friday.
Tether relies on a reserve of dollars and dollar-equivalent assets to maintain its one-to-one peg with the currency, though the quality of this stockpile has repeatedly been called into question. Tether files quarterly attestations from a Cayman Islands accounting firm on its holdings, which show that it has been steadily decreasing its exposure to assets like commercial paper in favour of more liquid instruments like Treasury bills.
Bloomberg reported in February that Fir Tree Capital Management was making a substantial short wager on Tether, predicting it could pay off within a year.
Tether chief technology officer Paolo Ardoino has repeatedly taken to Twitter to reassure markets since TerraUSD cratered. In a 12-part tweet this week, just after the WSJ story was published, he said Tether has "never failed a redemption" and has cut its commercial paper holdings by roughly US$45 billion.
"Tether portfolio is stronger than ever," he added.
Since the brief decoupling on May 12, Tether has traded close to its dollar peg.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore-based crypto lender Vauld in talks to be bought after freezing withdrawals​

ac_crypto%27_060722.jpg

Vauld became the latest among several crypto lenders to resort to emergency measures to stay afloat. PHOTO: REUTERS

July 6, 2022

MUMBAI (BLOOMBERG) - Crypto lender Vauld is in discussions to be bought by rival Nexo after freezing client withdrawals and hiring advisers for a potential restructuring.
Nexo is conducting a 60-day due diligence process on Singapore-based Vauld, Nexo co-founder Antoni Trenchev said in an interview. Vauld said on Monday (July 4) that it had suspended withdrawals, trading and deposits on its platform and was in talks with potential investors after facing "financial challenges".
Vauld became the latest among several crypto lenders to resort to emergency measures to stay afloat after a US$2 trillion (S$2.8 trillion) digital asset market rout sapped their finances. The turmoil has produced an opportunity for better-capitalised companies like billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX to swoop in and buy assets on the cheap.
Vauld pointed to a combination of volatile markets, financial troubles at "key business partners" and a jump in withdrawals since June 12 in its statement announcing the freeze. Mr Trenchev, however, indicated that the company's own actions might have contributed to its difficulties.
"It was built out correctly. Unfortunately, it turns out they made some bad investment decisions, but the company as such is interesting as it has a lot of traction in India and South-east Asia," Mr Trenchev said. He declined to elaborate on what those investment decisions were.
Earlier on Tuesday, Vauld chief executive officer Darshan Bathija tweeted about his company's potential deal with London-based Nexo.
Mr Bathija told the BusinessLine newspaper in May that he was targeting boosting assets under management (AUM) to US$5 billion from US$1 billion. Mr Trenchev said Vauld now has "hundreds of millions" of dollars in AUM, declining to be more specific.

Nexo in June said it was preparing an offer for assets of Celsius Network, shortly after Celsius announced a freeze on withdrawals. That offer was open for a week and lapsed after Celsius did not want to make a deal. Celsius on June 30 said it was exploring options such as "strategic transactions" as well as restructuring its debt.

Singapore crypto rules​

Nexo is in discussions with several other companies about buying their assets, Mr Trenchev said, without identifying them. The company in March announced a fund called Nexo Ventures and earmarked US$150 million for investing in "a wide range of early-stage retail and institutional projects".
"Any investment we make needs to make financial sense," Mr Trenchev said. "We are not the Federal Reserve where we can print money at will and spend as we see fit."
The speed of the market meltdown has ensnared crypto lenders large and small - with some, like Vauld, freezing withdrawals just weeks after ensuring customers that their business was sound. On June 16, Mr Bathija said on Vauld's blog that "over the last few days, all withdrawals were processed as usual and this will continue to be the case in the future".
On Monday, Vauld said it had hired financial and legal advisers to explore restructuring options, and planned to apply for a moratorium with Singapore courts to give itself "some breathing space".
Regulators are taking note of the crypto industry's trouble and say they are moving to bolster guardrails. Hours after Vauld's announcement on Monday, Singapore's central bank said it was considering new crypto rules to protect consumers.
"These may include placing limits on retail participation, and rules on the use of leverage when transacting in cryptocurrencies," Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who is also chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, said in a written response to a parliamentary question.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Crypto broker Voyager Digital files for bankruptcy amid Three Arrows fallout​

AK_vgr_060722.jpg

Voyager Digital late last week temporarily suspended trading, deposits and withdrawal amid challenging market conditions. PHOTO: AFP

July 6, 2022

MUMBAI (BLOOMBERG, REUTERS) - The cryptocurrency sector's troubles deepened on Wednesday (July 6) as broker Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy, becoming the second high-profile crypto firm after Singapore-based Three Arrows Capital to do so in recent days.
The firm and two affiliates, Voyager Digital LLC and Voyager Digital Holdings, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District of New York.
"We strongly believe in the future of the industry but the prolonged volatility in the crypto markets, and the default of Three Arrows Capital, require us to take this decisive action," chief executive Stephen Ehrlich said on Twitter.
New-York based Voyager is the latest in the digital asset sector to hit trouble. Hedge fund Three Arrows, to which Voyager had lent hundreds of millions of dollars, was ordered into liquidation last month after failing to repay creditors.
But much of the crypto industry's recent problems can be traced back to the spectacular collapse of Singapore-based Terraform Labs' TerraUSD in May, which saw the stablecoin lose almost all its value, along with its paired token.
Voyager Digital late last week temporarily suspended trading, deposits and withdrawal amid challenging market conditions. About US$2 trillion (S$2.8 trillion) in market value has been wiped from the crypto sector since a peak last year, amid a global wave of monetary tightening that drained liquidity and blew up leveraged bets.
Trading, deposits, withdrawals and loyalty rewards on the Voyager platform remain temporarily suspended, Mr Ehrlich added.

The co-founder of crypto exchange FTX US Sam Bankman-Fried had acted as a sort of lender of last resort for Voyager by providing credit lines via Alameda Research. Voyager's filing lists US$75 million of unsecured loans from Alameda, making the firm the biggest single creditor.

Three Arrows fallout​

Voyager offered crypto trading, staking - a way of earning rewards for holding certain cryptocurrencies - and yield products. Firms offering high-yield products including Celsius Network, Babel Finance and Vauld have suspended withdrawals as liquidity dried up.
Last month, Voyager issued a notice of default to Three Arrows Capital on a loan worth roughly US$675 million. It is actively pursuing recovery from the troubled crypto hedge fund, including through the court-ordered liquidation process in the British Virgin Islands.
Crypto markets weakened slightly after the latest filing. Bitcoin slipped about 2.4 per cent to US$19,950 as at 1.31pm in Singapore.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

MAS weighing more crypto safeguards for consumers: Tharman​

ac_coinw_060722.jpg

Attendees at Crypto Expo Asia 2022 in Singapore on June 21, 2022. MAS is carefully considering having additional customer protection rules for cryptocurrency transactions. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
claire_huang.png


Claire Huang
Business Correspondent

JUL 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - Singapore is considering more safeguards to protect consumers after the plunging prices of cryptocurrencies triggered a series of prominent players, including firms based here, becoming insolvent.
Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Tharman Shanmugaratnam on Monday (July 4) said the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has been "carefully considering" having additional consumer protection rules, including limiting retail participation and imposing rules on the use of leverage, or borrowed capital, when transacting in cryptocurrencies.
"Given the borderless nature of cryptocurrency markets, however, there is a need for regulatory coordination and cooperation globally. These issues are being discussed at various international standard setting bodies where MAS actively participates," he said, in a written reply to a parliamentary question on whether the regulator would put up more safeguards.
Mr Tharman, who is also MAS chairman, stressed that cryptocurrencies are highly risky and are not suitable for retail investors as most digital currencies are subject to sharp speculative price swings.
To this end, MAS in January this year went further than most other regulators to restrict the marketing and advertising of cryptocurrency services in public areas and disallow cryptocurrency trading being portrayed in a manner that trivialises its risks, he said.
Since then, these digital payment token service providers have removed cryptocurrency ATMs from public areas and taken down advertisements from public transport venues.
The crypto market has been battered in recent months, with the price of the world's most traded digital currency, Bitcoin, falling 70 per cent since November to hover at US$20,000 currently, while the total market capitalisation has plunged by nearly two-thirds to under US$1 trillion (S$1.4 trillion).

The sell-off came in the wake of the collapse of Singapore-based Terraform Labs' stablecoin TerraUSD and sister token Luna.
Global economic concerns, soaring inflation and climbing interest rates also heightened investor jitters, leading to the crypto rout.
The falling prices have landed some of the biggest names in the industry, including Singapore-based hedge fund Three Arrows Capital and Babel Finance, as well as exchanges Celsius Network and BlockFi, in trouble.
The latest to be added to the list is Singapore-based crypto lender Vauld, which on Monday announced that it would suspend withdrawals, trading and deposits.
"This is due to a combination of circumstances such as the volatile market conditions, the financial difficulties of our key business partners inevitably affecting us, and the current market climate, which has led to a significant amount of customer withdrawals in excess of US$197.7 million since June 12, 2022," the firm said.

Vauld said it is now in discussions with potential investors and that it intends to apply to the Singapore courts for a moratorium to give itself "breathing space to carry out the proposed restructuring exercise".
Meanwhile, Singapore-based Three Arrows was last week censured by MAS for giving false information and for managing more assets than the rules allow.
The hedge fund was ordered last week by a court in the British Virgin Islands to liquidate after creditors sued the company for failing to pay its debts. Crypto fund Mirana Corp is suing Three Arrows for US$13 million in Singapore's High court over a loan repayment, The Business Times reported on Monday.
Lender Genesis Trading has also been dragged into the unfolding crypto saga as it reportedly faces "hundreds of millions" of dollars in potential losses due to exposure to Three Arrows and Babel.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Six months into 2022, the situation is looking ugly for NFTs​

md_crypto_05072022.jpg

A non-fungible token displayed on the website of NFT marketplace OpenSea on Feb 28, 2022. PHOTO: REUTERS


JUL 5, 2022

LONDON (REUTERS) - The NFT dream is not dead, but it has taken a big beating.
The market for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) shone gloriously last year as crypto-rich speculators spent billions of dollars on the risky assets, pumping up prices and profits. Now, six months into 2022, it is looking ugly.
Monthly sales volume on the largest NFT marketplace, OpenSea, plunged to US$700 million (S$977 million) in June, down from US$2.6 billion in May and a far cry from January's peak of nearly US$5 billion.
By late June, the average NFT sale sunk to US$412, from US$1,754 at the end of April, according to NonFungible.com, which tracks sales on the Ethereum and Ronin blockchains.
"The crypto bear market has definitely had an impact on the NFT space," said Mr Gauthier Zuppinger, co-founder of NonFungible.com.
"We have seen so much speculation, so much hype around this kind of asset," he added. "Now, we see some sort of decrease just because people realise they will not become a millionaire in two days."
The NFT market has collapsed along with cryptocurrencies, which are typically used to pay for the assets, at a time when central banks have jacked up rates to combat inflation, and risk appetite has withered.

Bitcoin lost around 57 per cent in the six months of the year, while Ether has dropped 71 per cent.

Dip or death spiral?​

For critics, the crash confirms the folly of buying such assets, which are tradeable blockchain-based records linked to digital files such as images or videos, often artwork.
Malaysian businessman Sina Estavi, who bought an NFT of Twitter founder Jack Dorsey's first tweet for US$2.5 million last year, struggled to get bids of more than a few thousand dollars when he tried to resell it in April.


But Mr Benoit Bosc, global head of product at crypto trading firm GSR, sees the downturn as the perfect time to build a corporate NFT collection - the crypto equivalent of the fine art that traditional banks display to impress clients.
Last month, GSR spent US$500,000 on NFTs from what Mr Bosc calls "blue-chip" collections - those with large online fan bases.
His purchases included an NFT from the Bored Ape Yacht Club, a set of 10,000 cartoon monkeys made by United States-based company Yuga Labs and promoted by the likes of celebrities Paris Hilton and Jimmy Fallon.
Such is the hype surrounding Bored Apes that Yuga Labs raised US$285 million in April by selling tokens it says can be exchanged for land in a Bored Apes-themed virtual world it has not yet launched.
Yet the average sale price for a Bored Ape tumbled to around US$110,000 in June, having halved since its January peak of US$238,000, according to market tracker CryptoSlam.

Game over or on?​

Nonetheless, the future of NFTs is distinctly uncertain, as the era of low interest rates that encouraged investors to take risky bets comes to an end.
Some market watchers say the influence of NFTs on the art market will shrink. Meanwhile, even though the much-hyped vision for a blockchain-based metaverse has not materialised yet, enthusiasts expect NFTs to shake up the gaming industry, for example, by allowing players to own in-game assets such as avatar skins.
This risky combination of gaming and financial speculation may face difficulties, though. Most gamers prefer games that do not include NFTs or "play-to-earn" components, according to Mr John Egan, chief executive of technology research firm L'Atelier.
Although the groundbreaking new crypto regulations agreed by the European Union last week mostly excluded NFTs, Spain is separately seeking to clamp down on the way video games sell virtual assets for real money.
Meanwhile, the biggest NFT-based game, Axie Infinity, has seen its in-game token collapse to less than half a cent, down from a peak of 36 cents last year.
For Mr Egan, the NFT market is unlikely to recover in its current form.
But the underlying concept of creating unique digital assets is still "fundamentally important" and will have "massive applications" for the financial sector in future, he said.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Crypto needs consistent regulation across nations, says US Treasury​

md_crypto_08072022.jpg

The Fed has been exploring the possibility of a US central bank digital currency, but no final decision has been reached. PHOTO: REUTERS

July 8, 2022

WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - The United States and its foreign allies must work together to create shared standards for regulating cryptocurrencies to make it harder for bad participants to get away with crimes, the US Treasury Department said on Thursday (July 7).
"Uneven regulation, supervision and compliance across jurisdictions create opportunities for arbitrage and raise risks to financial stability and the protection of consumers, investors, businesses and markets," the US Treasury said in a news release.
Inadequate anti-money laundering and terrorism financing rules across different countries make it harder for the US to investigate illicit transactions when money flows offshore, such as with ransomware payments, the department said.
The need for shared standard-setting was one of the topics addressed in a framework for international cooperation that the department said it delivered to President Joe Biden on Thursday. The Treasury was directed to develop the framework - in coordination with other agencies like the State Department and the Commerce Department - under the White House's March executive order calling for an governmentwide strategy for digital assets.
As part of the framework, the Treasury also said the US must continue to work with international partners and be a leader in the discussions on central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, and digital payment architectures more generally.
The Federal Reserve as been exploring the possibility of a US CBDC, but no final decision has been reached.
"Such international work should continue to address the full spectrum of issues and challenges raised by digital assets, including financial stability; consumer and investor protection, and business risks; and money laundering, terrorist financing, proliferation financing, sanctions evasion and other illicit activities," the department said.

The Treasury committed to continue working within several key intergovernmental organisations, including the Group of Seven and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Crypto lender Celsius accused of fraud by ex-employee in lawsuit​

AK_btc_080722.jpg

Celsius promised retail customers outsized returns, sometimes as much as 19 per cent annually. PHOTO: REUTERS
UPDATED

July 8, 2022

NEW YORK (BLOOMBERG) - Celsius Network, the crypto lender that froze assets last month, used customer funds to manipulate the price of its proprietary token and lost hundreds of millions of dollars by failing to hedge risk, a former money manager for the company said in a lawsuit.
Celsius amassed more than US$20 billion (S$28 billion) in assets by offering interest rates as high as 18 per cent to customers who deposited their cryptocurrencies. Founder Alex Mashinsky dismissed skepticism about whether that was sustainable, saying the company was able to earn high rates itself.
But Celsius was in fact struggling to cover the payouts and suffered “severe exchange rate losses” due to the fluctuating values of different coins, according to a complaint filed on Thursday (July 7) in New York state court by KeyFi, the company founded by the former money manager, Jason Stone.
Mr Stone, who called Celsius a Ponzi scheme in the complaint, said it cheated him out of potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in pay.
The allegations come amid a credit crisis in cryptocurrency markets. Hedge fund Three Arrows Capital was ordered into liquidation last month, broker Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy this week and other firms offering high-yield products including Babel Finance and Vauld have suspended withdrawals.
Celsius’s customers have been unable to access their funds since June 12. The company said on June 30 that it’s considering restructuring its debts.
More than a million people entrusted their savings to Celsius, according to the company. The appeal was obvious: The rates it paid were tens or hundreds of times higher than traditional savings accounts.

Behind the scenes, Celsius was investing customer funds in risky trading strategies, without proper controls, according to the lawsuit. Starting in August 2020, Celsius started transferring hundreds of millions of dollars to Stone’s company, KeyFi.
Though the two firms didn’t have a written agreement, Mr Stone was given the private cryptographic keys to the funds, meaning he could have run off with them, according to the complaint.
Mr Stone was tasked with investing the money through DeFi. Short for “decentralised finance,” it’s a constellation of apps that let users borrow, lend and trade with each other, without middlemen.
At the time, many of the apps were paying users huge rewards in proprietary cryptocurrencies. KeyFi earned more than US$800 million for Celsius through DeFi strategies, according to the lawsuit. Mr Stone says Celsius was supposed to pay him a 20 per cent share of most of that but never did.
The problem, according to Mr Stone, was that Celsius mainly took deposits in Bitcoin and Ethereum, but his strategies earned rewards in other coins. That meant that if Bitcoin and Ethereum went up faster than the others, Celsius could end up owing more than it had, even if it was earning money.
Celsius also kept track of customers’ deposits in US dollar terms, even if they were actually owed Bitcoin or other tokens, according to the suit. When this error was discovered, it resulted in “a US$100-US$200 million hole on its balance sheet,” Mr Stone alleged.
Celsius raised US$50 million in 2018 by selling a proprietary token, CEL, and the company and its executives held large stocks of the cryptocurrency.
Stone now claims that Celsius in 2020 used US$90 million worth of Bitcoin deposits to “artificially inflate” the price of CEL. He says that let Mr Mashinsky “enrich himself,” and enabled Celsius to borrow against its CEL holdings. He also says that Celsius borrowed one billion Tethers from the stablecoin issuer to cover the hole in its balance sheet.
Mr Stone says he ended his relationship with Celsius in March 2021 once he discovered the improprieties. In a thread on Twitter, Mr Stone wrote that Celsius “assured me they had risk management and hedging in place. But in late Feb 2021, we discovered Celsius had lied to us.”
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore-based crypto firm Three Arrows founders' whereabouts unknown, foiling liquidators​

AK_zs_120722.jpg

Three Arrows, founded by former Credit Suisse traders Zhu Su (pictured) and Kyle Davies, succumbed to the widespread crypto sell-off last month. PHOTO: ZHU SU/TWITTER

Jul12, 2022

NEW YORK (BLOOMBERG) - The founders of bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital have not been cooperating in the firm's liquidation process and their whereabouts were unknown as at last Friday (July 8), according to court papers.
Representatives tapped to liquidate Three Arrows by a British Virgin Islands (BVI) judge had "not yet received any meaningful cooperation" from Mr Kyle Davies and Mr Zhu Su, lawyers said in US bankruptcy court filings. Advisory firm Teneo is attempting to round up and preserve the assets of the hedge fund.
The liquidators are seeking a United States judge's permission to subpoena Mr Davies, Mr Zhu and banks or crypto exchanges affiliated with Three Arrows to prevent the potential "dissipation" of the fund's assets, Mr Russell Crumpler of Teneo said in a sworn declaration. A video hearing is set for Tuesday.
"Here, that risk is heightened because a substantial portion of the debtor's assets are comprised of cash and digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens, that are readily transferable," lawyers for the liquidators said in court papers.
Three Arrows, which Mr Zhu and Mr Davies founded after trading at Credit Suisse Group, succumbed to the widespread crypto sell-off last month. Insolvency proceedings kicked off in the BVI and were followed by a so-called Chapter 15 bankruptcy filing in the US. The fund's downfall has rippled through the digital asset industry, helping to drive at least one crypto platform that counted Three Arrows as a counterparty into bankruptcy already.
The hedge fund's liquidators travelled to Three Arrows' office address in Singapore in late June in an attempt to track down the founders, according to court papers. It appeared dormant: The door was locked, computers were inactive and mail was stuffed under the door. People working in the surrounding offices said they had not seen anyone enter or exit the office recently.
The liquidators spoke to lawyers for Mr Davies and Mr Zhu via videoconference last week, according to court papers, but did not speak to the founders directly.

"While persons identifying themselves as 'Su Zhu' and 'Kyle' were present on the Zoom call, their video was turned off and they were on mute at all times with neither of them speaking despite questions being posed to them directly," Teneo's Mr Crumpler said in his court declaration.
The lawyers told Three Arrows' liquidators that Mr Zhu and Mr Davies intend to cooperate. A subsequent meeting was scheduled for Monday, according to court papers.
Advocatus Law LLP, the Singapore-based law firm that spoke to Three Arrows' liquidators on behalf of the fund's founders, did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside normal business hours on Monday.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Singapore's crypto aspirations shaken by Three Arrows collapse​

Alun John and Chen Lin
Tue, 12 July 2022


FILE PHOTO: A view of the Monetary Authority of Singapore's headquarters in Singapore

FILE PHOTO: A representation of the virtual cryptocurrency Bitcoin

1 / 2

Singapore's crypto aspirations shaken by Three Arrows collapse​

FILE PHOTO: A view of the Monetary Authority of Singapore's headquarters in Singapore
By Alun John and Chen Lin
HONG KONG/SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Singapore's ambitious cryptocurrency sector, by some measures Asia-Pacific's largest, faces an uncertain future after the recent collapse of crypto fund Three Arrows Capital, a high-profile casualty of the global digital currency downturn.
Crypto players in Southeast Asia's financial hub are bracing for further bankruptcies and legal tussles, and expect that regulators at the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), whose welcoming approach helped to attract firms from China, India and elsewhere, may become less accommodating.
"After recent events it appears likely that the MAS will get tougher on crypto and digital assets," said Hoi Tak Leung, a senior technology sector lawyer at Ashurst.
Investment in Singapore's crypto and blockchain companies surged to $1.48 billion in 2021, according to KPMG, ten times the previous year and nearly half the Asia Pacific total for 2021.
Regulators at the MAS have said they hope to encourage crypto-related services, a sharp contrast with China's ban, a crypto tax in India that has crippled trading, and incoming rules in Hong Kong restricting crypto investing to professionals.
Over 150 crypto companies applied for a new crypto payments licence from the MAS in 2020, although so far only a handful have received one.
But the picture has grown murky with the collapse of Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which began liquidation proceedings in the British Virgin Islands on June 27, court filings showed, after the global downturn in digital currencies left it unable to meet hundreds of millions of dollars in obligations.
3AC did not respond to a request for comment, and its liquidators told a U.S. bankruptcy court they cannot locate the fund's founders, Kyle Davies and Zhu Su.
The ripple effects of 3AC's collapse - and the subsequent market turmoil - have been swift and severe. Singapore-based crypto lending and trading platform Vauld said last week that it would suspend withdrawals, and the following day a rival crypto lender said it planned to acquire the company.
Another fund, Mirana, is suing 3AC in Singapore over a loan agreement, local media reported, citing court filings which are not available publicly. Mirana did not reply to requests for comment.
In the United States, crypto lender Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy last week, days after 3AC defaulted on a crypto loan worth $650 million it was owed, while crypto exchanges Genesis and Blockchain.com have also disclosed losses on their dealings with 3AC.
Rose Kehoe, managing director in Kroll's restructuring practice in Singapore, said in the coming weeks she expects crypto-related businesses facing liquidity issues to use Singapore's mechanisms for court protection of companies in restructuring.
"We will continue to see crypto markets globally being impacted by the contagion effect of recent market events, including in Singapore, a major cryptocurrency hub," she said.
Sector players are also wary of how Singapore's regulators may react.
"If Singapore decides to take a more hawkish approach towards crypto businesses in future, other countries in (Southeast Asia) could follow suit," said Jeff Mei, chief marketing officer at ChainUp, a Singapore crypto company.
"(This) could open a gap for Hong Kong to step into the arena more meaningfully."
MAS did not comment on the matter, but on June 30 it issued a rare public reprimand to 3AC for breaching fund rules, and added it was investigating the company on potential further breaches.
"I think (MAS) wanted to send a signal to the industry to say, '3AC was already on our watch list'," said Hagen Rooke, a Singapore-based partner at law firm Reed Smith. He said that such misdemeanours would normally be handled with a private wrap on the knuckles.
"The question is whether the MAS is going to become even more draconian in its approach to the crypto industry," he added, identifying new rules around crypto borrowing and lending as one likely regulatory focus.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

‘They couldn’t even scream any more. They were just sobbing’: the amateur investors ruined by the crypto crash​

The black hole of bitcoin investing

‘You fall into this La-La land of thinking: I’m going to make it.’ Illustration: Scott Balmer/The Guardian
Fuelled by hype and hysteria, the market in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies went from an obscure niche to a $3tn industry. Then the house of cards collapsed

Sirin Kale

Sirin Kale
Tue 12 Jul 2022 06.00 BST


In the gloom of an 18th-century drawing room at the private rehab clinic Castle Craig, near Peebles in the Scottish Borders, Roy, a 29-year-old victim of the global cryptocurrency crash, tells me his story. It is a dazzling summer’s day, but here the mood is sombre. Roy shifts uncomfortably in his chair as he begins.
It all started in February 2021, with a radio advert for Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency promoted by Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla. Intrigued, Roy started Googling, eventually using his credit card to make an initial investment of €2,500 (£2,200) in a range of cryptocurrencies. The value of Roy’s portfolio climbed to €8,000, then €100,000, then €525,000. Roy had entered the market during an adrenalised bull run, meaning an extended period of price growth. A combination of Covid stimulus packages, low interest rates and an unprecedented level of enthusiasm for cryptocurrency among furloughed workers meant the bull was careering out of sight.

Roy started spending all his time watching YouTube videos and speaking to other cryptocurrency enthusiasts in private groups on the messaging app Telegram. He had been treated for cocaine and alcohol addiction twice, but by 2021 he was sober and working as an addiction counsellor, although he was on sick leave as a result of panic attacks brought on by childhood trauma. He soon relapsed. By day, he checked his cryptocurrency wallets every 10 seconds; by night, he set alarms to go off on the hour. He began fantasising about a life free of financial constraints, in which he would never have to work. “I thought I was on top of the world,” Roy says. “Nobody could tell me anything. Money would fix every single problem I faced from now on.”
I always thought the next project would bring me back up again and I’d cash out before it crashed
Roy
Then the cryptocurrency market crashed. The price of bitcoin fell from £42,000 in May 2021 to £23,000 by the end of June. It rallied to an all-time high of £48,000 in November, before diving to £26,000 at the end of January. Since then, it has been in near-continuous freefall. At the time of writing, bitcoin is hovering at £17,000. “It felt like I had lost my life,” says Roy. “Because I had invested everything in crypto. I had built every dream I had on there. So, when it came crashing down, my whole life came crashing down.”
Desperate, Roy made a string of bad bets. The value of his portfolio dwindled to €20,000, then €3,000. “It got so out of control because I saw all my chances to live a better life fading away,” he says. “So I became really desperate and eventually just completely isolated. I didn’t want to see anybody, because I thought I was a failure.”
Most mornings, he would wake up shaking from alcohol withdrawal, order booze online and spend the day drinking and taking drugs. He developed stomach ulcers. “You can’t explain the pain,” he says. “I would drink and puke and drink and puke and drink and hope to keep it in, so the pain would go away. I felt like dying.”
In May, jobless and broke, Roy checked into Castle Craig, one of the only centres in the world that treats cryptocurrency addiction. (He lost his job when he relapsed; his rehab fees are covered by medical insurance.) His cryptocurrency portfolio is worth about €300. Now, amid the incongruous grandeur of a Scottish stately home, he is attempting to rebuild his life – and quieten the tormenting thought that he should have pulled out his money when he had the chance.
“It’s heartbreaking,” Roy says, softly. “I hate myself for the fact that I didn’t take it out.”

They gather on Telegram to let out howls of grief and short, sharp shrieks of pain. “Eeeeeeee!” yowls a young woman. “Waahahahah,” roars a man in a deep baritone. A third person wails like a baby. These are victims of the cryptocurrency bloodbath, 3,315 of whom have assembled in a “Bear Market Screaming Therapy Group” group to vent their anguish. “I had a few people lamenting and crying,” says the group’s founder, a 30-year-old cryptocurrency investor who gives only his first name, Giulio. “I decided not to ban them. I felt bad. They weren’t even able to scream any more. They were just sobbing.”
The cryptocurrency industry is in roiling waters. Scarcely a day seems to pass without a wave crashing across the sector. “The rollercoaster has turned and taken crypto holders on a downward spiral,” says Susannah Streeter, an analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. “Many people have been caused serious financial pain.”
Last month, major coins including bitcoin and ethereum dropped by more than one-third in just a week. While bitcoin has tumbled significantly on several occasions, this bear run – meaning a period of declining prices – feels different. The industry is larger and more interconnected than ever, with retail and institutional investors jostling for space in what was, until last year, a $3tn market. (The crash has wiped $2tn off the market’s value.)
In May, the “stablecoin” terra/luna collapsed, prompting the Guardian’s UK technology editor, Alex Hern, to ask whether this was the industry’s “Lehman Brothers moment”. It had been marketed as a safe bet, due to the fact it was pegged to the US dollar, and promised returns of up to 20%.
Cryptocurrency illustration

‘I thought I’d be able to retire early. But it’s all gone down the drain.’ Illustration: Scott Balmer/The Guardian
The carnage prompted further sell-offs. This month, the cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius Network halted withdrawals for its 1.7 million customers, citing “extreme market conditions”. A day later, Coinbase, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, announced that it was sacking 18% of its workforce. At the end of June, the hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, which was heavily leveraged in cryptocurrency and related businesses, went into liquidation.
Everywhere is panic and turmoil – and things look likely to get worse. The casualties range from ordinary retail investors to multimillionaire “whales” and celebrities – in May, the British rapper KSI tweeted that he had lost almost $3m in the terra/luna crash. There have been at least two reported suicides, in the UK and Taiwan; on the Reddit community for terra/luna investors, users share details of suicide hotlines.
Advocates argue that this is but a cryptocurrency winter, as seen in 2013 and 2018. Prices will rebound; spring will turn to summer; the bear becomes the bull. They lampoon so-called “paper-hands” investors, meaning those who abscond at the first sign of trouble, and urge each other to Hodl (“hold on for dear life”) and “buy the dip” (purchase coins when prices are low). Others are less certain. Will the frost ever thaw?

There are eight stages of crypto-crash grief.
Shock. “I couldn’t eat or sleep for two nights,” says Alla Driksne, a 34-year-old chef from London. “I got sick from the stress.” She has lost her life savings – a six-figure sum – in the Celsius freeze.
Denial. “I always thought the next project would bring me back up again and I’d cash out before it crashed,” says Roy. “In the next cycle, I’m going to try. In the next cycle, I’m going to do it again.” A part of him still believes this is possible.
Anger. Alex Koh, a 41-year-old engineer and personal finance YouTuber from Glasgow, directs his towards Do Kwon, the South Korean entrepreneur who founded terra/luna. Koh says he lost enough to buy a four-bedroom house in London. Kwon has been accused of fraud by five investors based in South Korea; he is being investigated there by a financial crimes unit and in the US by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The rollercoaster has taken crypto holders on a downward spiral. Many people have been caused serious financial pain
Susannah Streeter
Bargaining. Vahid, a 31-year-old from London, has used Twitter to plead for his money with Alex Mashinsky, the founder of Celsius. Vahid’s life savings, more than £50,000 in cryptocurrency, is locked in his Celsius account. Vahid had planned to use the money to start a business or buy a house. For support, he spends his time on conference calls with other Celsius victims; I listen in to one. “I know anything short of getting your native token [initial investment] back is unacceptable,” says one investor, with desperation in his voice. “But would you rather get back 10%, or 20%, or 34%, you know? Now, I’m hoping it’s not a complete loss.”
Depression. “I thought I’d be able to retire early,” says Koh. “But it’s all gone down the drain. I’ve never cried so much in my life.”
Acceptance and hope. “I worked my ass off doing 16-hour days for six years to earn this money,” says Driksne. “This is hard-earned money. That’s what hurts the most. I lost six years of hard work. But I am trying to stay positive. I’ll make it back again.”
Shame. Vahid hasn’t told anyone he has lost his life savings. “I don’t want people turning around to me, saying: you should have taken your money out last year,” he says. I ask him if he is embarrassed. “Of course,” he responds.
Processing. “I hope that I can show that I am willing to learn and accept my mistakes,” says Koh. “If I rebound from this, perhaps I can be an inspiration to people elsewhere around the world – or my kids, at least.”

The industry’s enthusiasts and sceptics agree on one thing: they saw this coming. Perhaps they didn’t predict the precise contours of the crash, or the fact that so many seemingly reputable companies would flame out, but there was a sense that the cryptocurrency bull would run out of road. The sector was too hot, too loaded with bad-faith actors, scammers, credulous investors and amateurs feigning expertise in Telegram groups, YouTube videos and Twitter threads. When internet jokes such as PooCoin and Dogecoin surged in popularity, it ought to have been apparent that a market correction was coming. Such stupidity cannot be sustained for long.
“Was it surprising?” says Dr Larisa Yarovaya, an associate professor of finance at the University of Southampton. “I think it was quite predictable.” The Bank of England has repeatedly told cryptocurrency investors to be prepared to lose all their money. Investors bought bitcoin as a speculative punt in 2020 and 2021 because interest rates were low and many had spare cash due to lockdowns and economic stimulus packages. But when interest rates and inflation began to rise, fuelled by Covid‑affected supply chains and the war in Ukraine, institutional investors preferred to put their money into safer assets.
“There is a fear factor rippling through financial markets about how out of control inflation is and whether central banks will be able to bring it under control,” says Hargreaves Lansdown’s Streeter. “When people feel richer, they are more likely to spend on riskier assets, like crypto. But in times of uncertainty, investors flee to safer havens.”
Alla Driksne.

‘I worked my ass off doing 16-hour days for six years to earn this money’ … Alla Driksne. Photograph: @allasyummyfood
The mania around bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies was fuelled by a social media hype machine unprecedented in the history of financial markets. Investors touted new coins that were amassing huge returns, hung off the tweets of crypto-influencers and spoke in impenetrable jargon. “Demand for bitcoin related purely to the level of interest in this new technology, and that interest was manipulated by the companies that offered different cryptocurrencies and exchanges and startups,” Yarovaya says. “All of this happened on social media, meaning that investors didn’t even know whether there was genuine interest in crypto, or lots of Twitter bots encouraging people to buy. The system wasn’t transparent.”
Koh got swept up in the social media frenzy. “You fall into this dream, this La-La land of thinking: I’m going to make it. It was like a whole trend, a pop culture. Now, sitting back, I think we got brainwashed.” Koh’s wife has a master’s degree in business administration and she urged him to be cautious. “She said: ‘Alex, it sounds like a Ponzi scheme … this is social media marketing to rope you in; take your liquidity and go.’” But he didn’t listen. “They call it ‘being an alpha’,” he says. “You have to be on Twitter, and follow the right people, and be in the right Discord channel. You listen to the right chatrooms. It makes you feel so special.”
At one point, says Koh, he convinced himself that terra/luna was such a great project that he “was ready to sell my house, my car, put everything in”. Now, he wouldn’t invest even £10 in cryptocurrencies. “It’s like a drug,” Koh says. “You’ve been there. You got high. And then you’re in rehab. I’m not going to go back in again.”
His greatest regret is that he encouraged others to invest in the terra/luna project. His YouTube channel, which has 17,600 subscribers, repeatedly championed the cryptocurrency. “I do feel responsible,” Koh says. “I don’t know what to do. How much I apologise. I haven’t got much hate, because I think I’ve been quite transparent in how much I’ve lost. I am not saying people forgive, though. I don’t forgive myself for it.”

Has the great cryptocurrency revolution simply evaporated?
Nassim Nicholas Taleb was once open-minded about the potential of cryptocurrencies. The economics professor originated the theory of the “black swan”: a hard-to-predict but seismic event, such as the 2008 financial crash, that is often rationalised after the fact with the benefit of hindsight. In 2018, Taleb wrote an essay describing bitcoin as “an excellent idea” and a possible “insurance policy against an Orwellian future”.
Last year, Taleb revised his position in a paper that described bitcoin’s value as “zero”. “This is the first time we’ve seen a financial bubble coupled with religious, cult‑like behaviour and an investment strategy not seen before in history,” he says. Many demur – and Taleb could yet be proved wrong. A common defence of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is that the underlying technology, blockchain, has functions not yet discovered.
Taleb says: “I would tell people who are still holding bitcoin: ask your grandmother if the idea makes sense. And if it doesn’t make sense to her, it doesn’t make sense … get out. Do something productive with your life.”
Alex Koh

‘If I rebound from this, perhaps I can be an inspiration to people’ … Alex Koh. Photograph: YouTube
But few in the cryptocurrency world are heeding the esteemed professor’s advice. Driksne plans to invest in cryptocurrency in the future, despite her six-figure loss, although she would steer clear of platforms such as Celsius. “I firmly believe crypto is the future,” agrees Vahid. “It’s not a Ponzi scheme or a scam.”
He compares cryptocurrency to the early days of Amazon and Google. When I point out that they were growing businesses, unlike bitcoin, Vahid says: “But bitcoin replaces gold. Bitcoin is digital gold.” Taleb is exasperated by this line of reasoning. “If you buy gold and store it in your basement or wear it on your neck, there is no chance of that gold turning to lead over any foreseeable horizon,” says Taleb. “Metals don’t need maintenance. Bitcoin requires continuous maintenance.”
It may be that future economists view the cryptocurrency boom of the early 2020s as a mass Dunning-Kruger event, fuelled by social media and facilitated by technology; an era in which amateurs took financial advice from fellow amateurs and bet the house on speculative investments. “Admitting that you know nothing just tells you that you’re lucky,” says Roy. “And my ego couldn’t handle that. I didn’t want to be lucky. I wanted to be someone who knew what they were doing. I’m smart, right? Tell me I’m smart, please? That’s how it goes. The whole community reinforced themselves, and each other.”
When Taleb published his 2021 paper, he received so much abuse that he had to lock his Twitter account. “I could not believe how psychopathic bitcoin people were,” says Taleb. Watching his tormentors have their portfolios wiped out has provoked a degree of schadenfreude, he admits. But he has compassion for the inexperienced investors who got swept up in the hype. “Lots of these kids lost everything they have,” he says. “You feel empathy for them.” The scammers, who urged others to invest in doomed projects while they were secretly cashing out? “They must be punished,” Taleb says.
But it seems likely that, just as in the 2008 financial crash, the bad-faith actors who exacerbated this meltdown will walk away unscathed. What’s more, many of the investors who bought into the cryptocurrency boom did so to claw back security after a decade racked by recession and uncertainty. Koh was one of those. “I was lucky to keep my job, but I was really angry at the suits, at the bankers, at the high‑bonus people,” he says. “The whole space of crypto was about giving normal people the option to gain the upper edge in society financially. It was a beacon of hope. We could ride the next big thing. But that beacon of hope has been put out for now. The trust has been broken. Yet again, sitting here, in decade number two, the bankers have won again.”
Future generations may look back at this boom as a period of mania, when money multiplied like bacteria and a collective delusion gripped financial markets. It may seem unfathomable, but it shouldn’t. After all, who doesn’t want to be rich?
Some names have been changed
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Lessons from the crypto carnage​

Market turmoil has revealed hidden excesses and failed experiments.​

vikramkhanna.png


Vikram Khanna
Associate Editor
HZCRYPTO120722.jpg

The global crypto market has fallen by close to 70 per cent in value since its peak in November last year. PHOTO: REUTERS

July 13, 2022

They call it a crypto winter, but the carnage that we have seen in recent months is more like a bloodbath.
Countless crypto assets have collapsed. The global crypto market has fallen by close to 70 per cent in value since its peak in November last year. As at July 11, the big daddy of them all, Bitcoin, was down almost 70 per cent from its November high. Ethereum, which is widely used in smart contracts, plunged 76 per cent. Another programmable crypto, Solana, was down 86 per cent.
The so-called "stablecoin" TerraUSD - which purported to maintain its value against the US dollar - fell almost vertically to zero within barely a week in May, together with its sister token Luna, wiping out more than US$40 billion (S$56.3 billion) in market capitalisation.
Several institutional players have also been either obliterated or are in deep distress, including the largest crypto lender the Celsius Network; the crypto brokerage Voyager Digital, which has filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States; and the Singapore-headquartered crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, which is being liquidated. With their funding drying up, hundreds of crypto start-ups have died or are on life support. Millions of investors have suffered heavy losses, with many losing their life savings.

Interconnected casualties​

As often happens in the financial world, the casualties are interconnected. It's worth asking, how did we get to this point, and what can we learn from the carnage?
To a large extent, the crypto bust is another manifestation of the turmoil that has hit the traditional financial markets, exploding the myth that crypto assets are uncorrelated to stocks and bonds, or, as was once presumed, are - at least in the case of Bitcoin - an effective inflation hedge.
When the US Federal Reserve started hiking interest rates in March in response to soaring inflation, stock market investors took fright, especially those holding technology stocks, some of which have collapsed 80 per cent. Faced with margin calls, they were forced to sell their other holdings, including cryptos. Investors also shifted to safer assets such as bonds and fixed deposits, liquidating the more volatile and risky parts of their portfolios. Crypto assets would have been at the top of the list. In market downturns, selling tends to feed on itself, so even investors who had only crypto assets joined in; "fear of missing out" works just as well in bear markets as in bull markets.

Hidden excesses​

But a lot of the carnage was also the result of excesses in the cryptoverse that were hidden during the good times but have now been exposed, in a reminder of the famous saying by the billionaire investor Warren Buffet: "When the tide goes out, you can see who is swimming naked."
One of the excesses was the crazy yields offered by some crypto platforms. For example, TerraLabs, the company behind the Terra-Luna stablecoin called TerraUSD (UST) offered investors a 20 per cent yield to sign on to its platform called the Anchor Protocol. The idea was to spur adoption of UST, and at a time when many traditional bank deposits yielded barely 1 per cent, millions of investors fell for it.
The Celsius network lured customers with annual yields of over 18 per cent on their crypto deposits. Through what financial voodoo these firms managed to offer such exorbitant yields, which match those on distressed bonds, is a mystery. Funding from venture capitalists may be one explanation, Ponzi schemes may be another, but whatever the mechanism, the yields were clearly unsustainable, especially after the markets went south.

Another excess was high leverage. Many crypto firms borrowed recklessly from one another in crypto assets to speculate in other cryptos. When the markets fell, margin calls got triggered, which the borrowers could not meet, resulting in the liquidation of their positions and their collateral, in waves of selling that spread through the cryptoverse.
Three Arrows Capital was a case in point. It was licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to manage up to $250 million in assets, with no more than 30 qualified investors, but reports emerged that it had in fact been managing assets than ran into the billions of dollars. The blockchain analytics firm Nansen estimated its assets at US$10 billion, which implies that it had obviously taken on massive leverage. Some of its assets were reportedly invested in the stablecoin token Luna, which fell to zero in May, as well as in other speculative crypto-related ventures that were also decimated. On June 30, MAS reprimanded Three Arrows for providing false information and exceeding the threshold of assets that it was licensed to manage, but by then the firm was already on the verge of liquidation.

There were also experiments that turned awry. Some stablecoins turned anything but stable because they were pegged to the US dollar through questionable means. For example, rather than being fully backed by actual US dollars or even liquid securities, the stablecoin token Luna's peg was based on an algorithm. The peg did not hold up in the face of massive withdrawals from the Terra-Luna ecosystem, and its collapse happened in a matter of days.
This is reminiscent of currency crises in many emerging economies, such as Thailand, Argentina and Nigeria, where currencies were pegged to the US dollar and offered outsize interest rates to attract holders. For a time, investing in these currencies was a one-way bet - holders enjoyed high interest rates and were lulled into believing that the value of their holdings would remain stable in US dollar terms.
But once capital started fleeing from these countries because of a confidence crisis, their governments found that they did not have enough foreign reserves to support their pegs, which broke, sending their currencies into free fall.
The point is that any time a peg is viewed as unsustainable - for whatever reason - it becomes vulnerable to speculative attack. This is what may have happened in the case of Terra-Luna. But unlike in the case of real economies, in this case there was no central bank, no International Monetary Fund, to come to the rescue, so the free fall in the value of the token went all the way to zero.

Lessons learnt​

So what lessons can we learn from the crypto carnage? First, it has demonstrated that investors do not get protection by diversifying into crypto assets, which are equally vulnerable to sharp declines in value as other risk assets - if not more so - and can be even more volatile. Crypto assets - which proliferated after the launch of Bitcoin in 2009 - had never before been tested in an environment of sharply tightening liquidity and recent events show that they enjoy no insulation during such episodes.
Second, barring a few fully backed stablecoins, crypto assets are highly correlated. Whereas during a stock-market meltdown there may be "defensive" stocks that are able to weather a downturn, in the crypto space just about everything tends to fall. This is partly the result of leverage, which is often hidden until something blows up. The collateral that borrowers use is unknown. It might have been considered "high-quality" collateral when the loan was made, but when the projects funded by the borrowers fail, that collateral gets dumped. The collapse of Bitcoin, for example, was partly because it was widely used as collateral by borrowers - such as the company behind Terra-Luna - and got liquidated on a huge scale when their projects failed, sending it into a tailspin as well, dragging down other cryptocurrencies with it.
There are lessons for regulators as well. One is the need for stronger safeguards for retail investors. While Singapore discourages retail participation in crypto assets and restricts the marketing of crypto services in public areas, it might need to go further.
jccrypto13.jpg

ST ILLUSTRATION: MIEL
Last week, Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who is also chairman of the MAS, said in Parliament that the MAS was considering placing limits on retail participation as well as rules on the use of leverage when transacting in crypto assets. These are steps in the right direction.
After the experience with Three Arrows Capital, the due diligence process before approving crypto-related businesses setting up in Singapore would also need to be tightened and disclosure requirements increased - particularly on leverage, the collateral used by these businesses, the nature of their investments and their risk-management controls.
But that done, Singapore must continue to leave its door open to the crypto industry. It will survive the carnage it is going through and will likely emerge stronger. The fact that there have been bad actors and excessive risk-taking - which is not uncommon in industries during their infancy - should not detract from the fact that many crypto-related businesses are innovative and offer useful services - for example, in the areas of payment transfers, blockchain solutions and metaverse applications. They will be important players in the future of any financial centre.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
There was no fraud.
Excrement was sold to willing buyers at exorbitant prices. Nobody forced them to buy.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Crypto lender Celsius files for bankruptcy after cash crunch​

md_celnet_14072022.jpg

Celsius froze customer withdrawals last month, blaming "extreme market conditions". PHOTO: REUTERS

JUL 14, 2022

PORTLAND, Oregon (BLOOMBERG) - Crypto lender Celsius Network filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, a month after it froze customer withdrawals, joining other casualties battered by a rout in digital assets.
Celsius, which has US$167 million (S$234 million) cash on hand, said it took the step to stabilise its business and work out a restructuring for all stakeholders.
The company, which had amassed more than US$20 billion in assets by offering interest rates as high as 18 per cent to customers who deposited their cryptocurrencies, had paused all withdrawals as well as some other functions in mid-June, citing “extreme market conditions”.
Cryptocurrency platforms have come under increasing pressure as the Federal Reserve aggressively raises interest rates, hurting risk sentiment and squeezing funding costs.
Celsius is just one of many crypto companies suffering as risky bets turned against them in the current bear market. Crypto broker Voyager Digital filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection earlier this month, while liquidators have been called in for bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital.
In its statement on Wednesday, Celsius called that pause a “difficult but necessary decision”. Without the halt, it said, “the acceleration of withdrawals would have allowed certain customers - those who were first to act - to be paid in full while leaving others behind to wait for Celsius to harvest value from illiquid or longer-term asset deployment activities before they receive a recovery”.
Celsius did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Co-founder and chief executive officer Alex Mashinsky said in the statement that the move would strengthen the future of the company.

The firm has petitioned to continue to operate. It is not requesting authority to allow customer withdrawals right now, saying that customer claims would be handled through the Chapter 11 process. Both estimated assets and estimated liabilities are between US$1 billion and US$10 billion, according to the filing.
Kirkland & Ellis is serving as legal counsel, with Centerview Partners as financial adviser and Alvarez & Marsal the restructuring adviser to Celsius.
Celsius promised yields of more than 18 per cent to customers willing to lend out their crypto. In turn, it lent those coins to institutional investors, but was also a participant in a slew of decentralised-finance applications.
When the TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin and related Luna token collapsed in May, Celsius scrambled to pull its funds out of Terra’s Anchor Protocol, which offered 20 per cent returns on UST deposits.
More recently, it suffered as another large holding - a token known as staked ETH, or stETH, which is tied to the value of Ether - became largely illiquid and more widely discounted to Ether.
In the past month, Celsius paid back all - more than US$900 million - of its debt in decentralised applications Aave, Compound and MakerDAO, according to blockchain data and tracker Zapper.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Are cryptocurrency players too close for comfort?​

ads-crypto-140722.jpg

A brutal sell-off has wiped out more than US$2 trillion from the global digital token market since November. PHOTO: AFP
claire_huang.png


Claire Huang
Business Correspondent

JUL 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - The cryptocurrency sector, where prices have yet to hit bottom, is bracing itself for a further onslaught as prominent player Celsius Network's bankruptcy filings could shed light on how intertwined industry players are and how they recycle capital.
The retail lender on Thursday (July 14) filed for bankruptcy protection - or Chapter 11 - in New York, forced by the tumble in digital currency prices that has left a gaping hole in its balance sheet, reportedly to the tune of billions.
The brutal sell-off that has come as a result of investors fleeing risky assets amid soaring interest rates has wiped out more than US$2 trillion (S$2.8 trillion) from the global digital token market since November.
Similar to a bank, Celsius loaned deposits from retail investors to the biggest names in crypto. It also invested the deposits in the equivalent of the wholesale crypto market, including decentralised finance or DeFi protocols that use blockchain technology to offer services such as loans and insurance.
Celsius' bankruptcy could highlight how interconnected and fragile players in the food chain are, besides giving a glimpse into how capital is highly recycled in the crypto space.
The players are too close for comfort in what is largely an unregulated market, and much of the governance is left to individual companies, said banking veteran Daniel Lee, who is involved in some crypto projects.
"You can see that that's what's happening in crypto. Most regulations in crypto are focused on money laundering and terrorism financing but not on prudent financing, which is why someone comes to a player, the player can give you an unsecured loan.

"Once you're doing unsecured lending, to connected parties or not, you have no room to manoeuvre when something bad happens or when it's a bear market," he said.
Blockchain data and software service provider Chainalysis's co-founder Jonathan Levin said that in all financial markets, there are lenders and borrowers creating leverage and contagion risks inside systems.
The key, he said, is to think about risk management and how regulators oversee the major markets.


Cascading effects of the liquidity crunch sparked by the market rout, coupled with how tightly linked and leveraged the crypto space is, have landed many in the soup. These include Celsius, British Virgin Islands hedge fund Three Arrows Capital and Canadian brokerage Voyager Digital; all three have filed for bankruptcy protection in the same New York court.
Crypto trading firm Alameda Research is another example of just how interconnected the ecosystem can be.
Founded by crypto billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried, Hong Kong-based Alameda is a creditor, shareholder and borrower in the case of bankrupt brokerage Voyager Digital.
It borrowed US$376.8 million worth of cryptocurrencies from Voyager, loaned a separate US$75 million to Voyager to ease the latter's liquidity crunch, and made equity investments of over US$100 million in Voyager.
Mr Danny Chong, co-founder of crypto asset management firm Tranchess, said there is "a considerably larger amount of concentrated risk" when a business or a market is developing from scratch.
"Being highly leveraged and intertwined is never a good thing, so growth in diversity is key," he said, adding that there needs to be diversity in terms of players, products and innovations for the crypto market to flourish in the longer term.

Despite the onset of a "crypto winter", big names in and out of the sector have stepped in to buy out or bail out troubled firms.
In the past month or so, Mr Bankman-Fried provided emergency relief funds of almost US$750 million to Voyager and lender BlockFi, which he later acquired.
Blockchain project Tron's chief executive Justin Sun said he was willing to use up to US$5 billion to help firms in trouble, while exchange Binance's chief executive Zhao Changpeng said he was looking to save "multiple projects".
United Kingdom-based crypto lender Nexo has offered to fully acquire Singapore-based lending and trading platform Vauld, which stopped withdrawals early this month.
Big names in traditional finance such as Goldman Sachs and Citibank are also getting into play.
"Big players with massive asset portfolios can always come in as saviours, but in reality they are buying distressed assets that, as the market cycle returns, can be tremendously profitable," said Mr Sean Lee, advisor to global alliance Crypto Council for Innovation.
Others like Mr Levin think having institutional names that understand the financial risks involved in advising and structuring businesses in the crypto space will improve the sector as a whole.
The crypto market, being nascent, does not have structure and discipline at the moment, Mr Daniel Lee said.
He cited the lessons learnt from the Pan-Electric crisis in 1985, when regulators in Singapore and Malaysia took the unprecedented step of shutting down their stock markets.
The crisis drove regulators to overhaul the securities industry and laid the foundation for Singapore's current market structure.
Given the global nature of crypto and the lack of global standards, Mr Daniel Lee said Singapore regulators can adapt their experience and the principles applied in other asset classes to crypto.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Crypto lender Celsius reveals $1.67 billion hole in bankruptcy filing​

md_celcius_15072022.jpg

Celsius froze withdrawals last month, citing "extreme" market conditions. PHOTO: REUTERS

July 15, 2022

WASHINGTON (REUTERS) - Celsius Network listed a US$1.19 billion (S$1.67 billion) deficit on its balance sheet in a bankruptcy court filing on Thursday (July 14), a day after the cryptocurrency lender filed for filed for bankruptcy protection, or Chapter 11.
Celsius froze withdrawals last month, citing "extreme" market conditions, cutting off access to savings for individual investors and sending tremors through the crypto market.
In the filing at the United States Bankruptcy Court for Southern District of New York on Thursday, Celsius also said it had US$40 million in claims against Singapore-based Three Arrows Capital, a crypto hedge fund that filed for bankruptcy earlier this month.
As at July 13, Crypto had about 23,000 outstanding loans to retail borrowers totalling US$411 million backed by collateral with a market value of US$765.5 million in digital assets, it added.
Crypto lenders boomed during the Covid-19 pandemic, drawing depositors with high interest rates and easy access to loans rarely offered by traditional banks. They lent out tokens to mostly institutional investors, making a profit from the difference.
But the lenders' business model came under scrutiny after a sharp crypto market sell-off spurred by the collapse of major tokens TerraUSD and Luna in May.
Another US crypto lender, Voyager Digital, filed for bankruptcy this month after suspending withdrawals and deposits. Vauld, a smaller lender in Singapore, also froze withdrawals this month.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

NFT marketplace OpenSea slashes 20% of jobs amid crypto slump​

md_nft_15072022.jpg

OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace in the world, had explosive sales growth in 2021. PHOTO: REUTERS

Jul15, 2022

BENGALURU (REUTERS) - Non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace OpenSea has cut 20 per cent of its workforce to reduce costs in the face of a prolonged slump in digital asset markets, the New York-based company said on Thursday (July 14).
OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace in the world, had explosive sales growth in 2021 as the rise of cryptocurrencies created a new group of crypto-rich speculators.
But the nascent NFT market has slumped in recent months as cryptocurrencies plunged and investors became more risk-averse in the face of high inflation, central bank rate hikes and recession fears.
"The reality is that we have entered an unprecedented combination of a crypto winter and broad macroeconomic instability, and we need to prepare the company for the possibility of a prolonged downturn," OpenSea chief executive Devin Finzer said in a statement on Twitter.
OpenSea's NFT sales volume on the Ethereum blockchain plunged to US$700 million (S$982.3 million) in June, down from US$2.6 billion in May and a far cry from January's peak of nearly US$5 billion.
NFTs are blockchain-based assets that represent ownership of digital files such as images and text.
Mr Finzer said the job cuts would allow the company to maintain five years of growth at current volumes under various potential downturn scenarios.

Last month, cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase said it would cut about 1,100 jobs, or 18 per cent of its workforce.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Three Arrows Capital liquidators seek to preserve S'pore assets of bankrupt crypto hedge fund​

ac_zhusu_130722.jpg

The whereabouts of the founders of Three Arrows Capital, Zhu Su (pictured) and Kyle Davies, remain unknown. PHOTO: ZHU SU/TWITTER
graceleong.png


Grace Leong
Senior Business Correspondent

Jul 15, 2022


SINGAPORE - The liquidators of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) are trying to investigate and preserve the Singapore assets of the bankrupt crypto hedge fund, The Straits Times has learned. The whereabouts of its founders Zhu Su and Kyle Davies remain unknown.
In a chambers hearing on Friday morning (July 15), the Singapore lawyers for advisory firm Teneo, are seeking an order from the High Court to recognise the British Virgin Islands (BVI) liquidation order and for Teneo’s Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer to carry out their duties as joint liquidators here.
The liquidators are represented by WongPartnership LLP partners Manoj Sandrasegara, Lionel Leo and Daniel Liu.
Lawyers specialising in Singapore restructuring law say they would typically apply for provisional relief to allow the liquidators to administer or realise 3AC's assets in Singapore as well as conduct the examination of individuals including Mr Zhu and Mr Davies to ascertain the hedge fund's assets.
If the provisional relief is ordered, the liquidators will likely be taking all the actions permitted therein to secure 3AC's assets in Singapore for the benefit of the fund's creditors, they say.
Mr Robson Lee, a corporate law partner at US law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, told ST that a recognition application of the BVI liquidation order would ask the Singapore court to endorse in substance the orders that have been granted by the BVI court.
“It is likely that the liquidators will request the Singapore court to grant an order that the assets of 3AC that are located within Singapore and elsewhere, in addition to the US, be administered and managed by the liquidators to liquidate and to obtain funds to satisfy the debts and liabilities owed by the company.

“This is because the BVI court order is restricted only to the assets of 3AC that are located within the US,” he said.
The liquidators will likely seek a Singapore court order to subpoena the company’s founders, and any other entities or persons that the liquidators reasonably determine may have information relevant to 3AC’s business,” Mr Lee added.
In order to apply for an order to freeze the founders’ assets, the liquidators must first establish that the founders are personally responsible for the collapse of 3AC arising from their mismanagement or errant conduct, and that there is legal basis to institute claims against each of them for corporate mismanagement or misdemeanors, and seeking a court order to prevent each of them from disposing their personal assets and properties, Mr Lee said.


Ms Felicia Tan, a partner in TSMP Law Corp’s litigation, insolvency & restructuring team, said the BVI liquidators will likely seek a declaration that they have a suite of powers that will include enabling them to administer assets and examine individuals such as the founders and those either directly or indirectly connected with the company.
“Whether to take other legal action (such as a freezing injunction application) is a question the liquidators will answer after they have investigated assets and examined the individuals as they will have to justify this action,” she added.
The Straits Times reported on July 1 that at least one of Zhu Su's family's properties may be put up for sale in the aftermath of the collapse of Mr Zhu's high-profile crypto hedge fund.
According to documents seen by ST, Mr Zhu and his family own at least two good class bungalows (GCBs) here, one in Dalvey Road and another in Yarwood Avenue. He also owns a strata landed home in the Balmoral Road area.
Other media reports claim a shophouse and another GCB in the Pierce/Swettenham area are linked to Mr Zhu or other 3AC-related parties including Mr Davies.
The parties are also said to own several high-end cars, and have a 30-million euro (S42 million) yacht on order.
A United States federal bankruptcy court earlier granted an emergency motion sought by the liquidators to subpoena Mr Davies and Mr Zhu, along with banks and digital asset exchanges tied to the Singapore-based hedge fund.
The duo founded 3AC after trading at Credit Suisse Group, succumbed to the widespread crypto sell-off last month. Insolvency proceedings kicked off in the British Virgin Islands and were followed by a Chapter 15 bankruptcy filing in the US.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Han Rasman

Three Arrows Capital owners have gone missing. A few weeks back Zhu Su was in a spectacular hurry to sell his S$48.8 million Good Class Bungalow, which are a luxury asset for elites that space-constraint Singapore can ill afford. Interestingly, Zhu Su is indicated as a preferred creditor of 3AC. The reasons why the founders of a hyper-growth, non-startup company founded in 2012 need this protection are not many. We are likely to discover in the weeks ahead that rampant grand fraud occurred, and another notch in the belt has been scored for Singapore's aspirations to be the cryptocurrency capital of the world.

It is long overdue for us to review Singapore's senseless need to be in before anyone else. Lawmakers and ministers invited cryptocurrency bucket shops into the country and made it impossible for them to sell to Singaporeans. They knew, and were okay with cryptocurrency being a fraud as long as it was sold to the rest of the world and Singapore got a cut in corporate tax, with all of the attendant investments in property. But if there is one thing I've learned about operationalizing risk management, you cannot price in reputation. Let's not turn our fair city into a money-laundering and fraud hub for the rest of the world.
 
Top