stupid thread from an old fart...beings to rubbish chute!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Contrary to popular belief Kinana is back stronger than before
- Thread starter OldFart
- Start date
If Kinana is weak he won't have any problems here as he is the forum boss favorite.
I beg your pardon. Singapore's low TFR is for the entire population meaning that even with the relatively higher fertility rate for Malays, overall it is still low. Malaysian Chinese cannot be compared with Sing Chinese. Even more stark are the Malay fertility. In Singapore, even Malays barely hold the replacement rate.
For your info, Malaysia's TFR is 2.6 while Singapore's is a miserable 1.2.
Last edited:
Ball-less.
Which part of Malaysia did you visit to make such a conclusion, faggotland?
All the Malaysians i know have at least 3 kids. Prove me wrong.
All the Malaysians i know have at least 3 kids. Prove me wrong.
Why is it the Malays in Singapore which has much lower income have more kids?
Income therefore is not the issue. Its mentality
Nobody is begrudging the fact that Malays are more relax and therefore have more kids but even Malays in Singapore are having a hard time trying to replace themselves.
We had an even harder time 30 years ago but had more kids. Its a matter of mentality, not ability bro.
Singapore is such a unique place. The entire population is suffering from a mentality defect except the PAP. OMG.
You have a similar posting style to an old time favorite forumner here.
You are kidding. That is why most bros here think you are an FT. 30 years ago, the TFR was closer to 5 or 6. Back then it was relatively stress free. When you finished work, you go back to your family and had quality time.
He actually has a tape-recorder with him and he just plays in endless loop from that recorder.
lol!!!!! Lol!!!!!
Nope, not true. Life was much harder and ppl do work long hours too.
In fact, with better transport and technology, we spend more time at home.
BTW do you know we use to work 5.5 days per week 30 years ago?
Wrong. We worked 6 days per week then 5.5 days which stayed that way for a long time because of Richard Hu until around 16 to 17 years ago when it was changed to 5 days. Today, they are still people who work 5.5 days. Although we worked 5.5 days or even 6 days, we always reached home on time and no overtime. Very stress free during work. Everywhere is so near to everywhere else because there was only a population of less than two million and most people stayed close to the city. Buses could travel quickly because of jam free roads. There were no queues at bus stops. You are quite young ain't you? Were you born yet?
Last edited:
Nope, not true, we reached home late because there was no MRT. I know many people who quit work on time and reach home by 6 or earlier, including PMETs.
The people who tend to go home late are in the manufacturing sector and many had been phased out over the last 10 years.
At least you know we worked 6 or 5.5 days,
MRT is a public transport. In those days any graduate from Uni or Poly could own a car, even for SC or HSC holders after working a few years and they could also buy houses.
Last edited:
Nope, not true. I am very sure you don't know what you are talking about. I had many graduate frens who don't own cars until much later in life. Traffic was also jammed without the highways and bridges we have today.
Adn we worked 6 days remember?
Similar threads
