• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chinese girl 16, the youngest person ever to become world chess champion

Extremist

Alfrescian
Loyal
08kristofimg-popup.jpg


If there’s a human face on Rising China, it belongs not to some Politburo chief, not to an Internet tycoon, but to a quiet, mild-mannered teenage girl named Hou Yifan.

Ms. Hou (whose name is pronounced Ho Ee-fahn) is an astonishing phenomenon: at 16, she is the new women’s world chess champion, the youngest person, male or female, ever to win a world championship. And she reflects the way China — by investing heavily in education and human capital, particularly in young women — is increasingly having an outsize impact on every aspect of the world.

Napoleon is famously said to have declared, “When China wakes, it will shake the world.” That is becoming true even in spheres that China historically has had little connection with, like chess, basketball, rare earth minerals, cyber warfare, space exploration and nuclear research.

This is a process that Miss Hou exemplifies. Only about 1 percent of Chinese play chess, and China has never been a chess power. But since 1991, China has produced four women’s world chess champions, and Ms. Hou is the one with by far the most promise.

At this point, I have to put my sensitive male ego aside. You see, Ms. Hou gamely agreed to play me after I interviewed her. She had just flown into Beijing after winning the world championship, and she was exhausted — and she shredded me in 21 moves.

Most dispiriting, when I was teetering at the abyss near the end of the game, her coach nudged her and suggested mischievously that we should switch sides. Ms. Hou would inherit my impossible position — and the gleam in her coach’s eye suggested that she would still win.

I protested that I could survive being beaten on the chess board by a schoolgirl. But to be toyed with, like a mouse by a cat — that would be too much. Ms. Hou nodded compassionately and checkmated me a few moves later.

At 14 she became the youngest female grandmaster ever. She’s still so young that it’s unclear just how remarkable she will become.

Women in general haven’t been nearly as good at chess as men, and the world’s top women are mostly ranked well below the top men — but Ms. Hou could be an exception. She is the only female chess player today considered to have a shot at becoming one of the top few players in the world, male or female.

Cynics sometimes suggest that China’s rise as a world power is largely a matter of government manipulation of currency rates and trade rules, and there’s no doubt that there’s plenty of rigging or cheating going on in every sphere. But China has also done an extraordinarily good job of investing in its people and in spreading opportunity across the country. Moreover, perhaps as a legacy of Confucianism, its citizens have shown a passion for education and self-improvement — along with remarkable capacity for discipline and hard work, what the Chinese call “chi ku,” or “eating bitterness.”

Ms. Hou dined on plenty of bitterness in working her way up to champion. She grew up in the boondocks, in a county town in Jiangsu Province, and her parents did not play chess. But they lavished attention on her and spoiled her, as parents of only children (“little emperors”) routinely do in China.

China used to be one of the most sexist societies in the world — with female infanticide, foot binding, and concubinage — but it turned a corner and now is remarkably good at giving opportunities to girls as well as boys. When Ms. Hou’s parents noticed her interest in a chess board at a store, they promptly bought her a chess set — and then hired a chess tutor for her.

Ye Jiangchuan, the chief coach of the national men’s and women’s teams, told me that he played Ms. Hou when she was 9 years old — and was stunned. “I saw that this kid was special,” he told me, and he invited her to move to Beijing to play with the national teams. Three years later she was the youngest girl ever to compete in the world chess championships.

It will be many, many decades before China can challenge the United States as the overall “No. 1” in the world, for we have a huge lead and China still must show that it can transition to a more open and democratic society. But already in discrete areas — its automobile market, carbon emissions and now women’s chess — China is emerging as No. 1 here and there, and that process will continue.

There’s a lesson for us as well. China’s national commitment to education, opportunity and eating bitterness — those are qualities that we in the West might emulate as well. As you know after you’ve been checkmated by Hou Yifan.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/opinion/09kristof.html?_r=1&
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
My guess is she started playing chess when she was 5.

Talent is overrated. Chess at the highest level is all about pattern recognition. :wink:
 
Last edited:

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Talent is overrated. Chess at the highest level is all about pattern recognition. :wink:

Deep Blue, the world's best chess computer, has already beaten the world's all-time greatest player, Gary Kasparov.

In Weiqi (or Go), the world's best computer can only play at a level of 6 Dan, way below the top masters of 9 and 10 Dan. And the world's best Weiqi players are Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The best European players are only at 6 Dan.

Go figure.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
In Weiqi (or Go), the world's best computer can only play at a level of 6 Dan, way below the top masters of 9 and 10 Dan. And the world's best Weiqi players are Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The best European players are only at 6 Dan.

Go figure.

The computer think too much? :confused:

Or there's some Eastern philosophical principle to be applied in this game of Go to win? :confused: :confused:
 

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The computer think too much? :confused:

Or there's some Eastern philosophical principle to be applied in this game of Go to win? :confused: :confused:

Computers use brute strength - high speed and power to calculate billions of moves down the game-tree - to arrive at a no-loss move.

This approach works with checkers and even chess, because of their limited number of permutations. (The Chinook checkers program has already mastered checkers - it plays it perfectly every time so that it will never lose.)

On the other hand, Weiqi is so much more complex, with so many more permutations (at least 10^170 legal moves) that there's no way a computer can compute all the various possible moves and their outcomes in a time-controlled contest. Human players use strategies rather than brute calculation, but computer algorithms are notoriously weak at strategies.

That's why scientists agree that Weiqi is the best measure of a computer ability to 'think' like a human – artificial intelligence. And until a computer can be programmed to 'think', it will remain a mediocre Weiqi player.
 
Last edited:

TenderLovingCare

Alfrescian
Loyal
Deep Blue, the world's best chess computer, has already beaten the world's all-time greatest player, Gary Kasparov.

Deep Blue did not beat Gary Kasparov all the time.

In the last encounter in 1997, Deep Blue won the game with 2 win to one with 3 draws.

Kasparov had beaten a previous version of Deep Blue in 1996.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer)

Deep Blue was a chess-playing computer developed by IBM. On May 11, 1997, the machine, with human intervention between games, won the second six-game match against world champion Garry Kasparov by two wins to one with three draws.[1] Kasparov accused IBM of cheating and demanded a rematch, but IBM refused and dismantled Deep Blue.[2] Kasparov had beaten a previous version of Deep Blue in 1996.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
Computers use brute strength - high speed and power to calculate billions of moves down the game-tree - to arrive at a no-loss move.

This approach works with checkers and even chess, because of their limited number of permutations. (The Chinook checkers program has already mastered checkers - it plays it perfectly every time so that it will never lose.)

On the other hand, Weiqi is so much more complex, with so many more permutations (at least 10^170 legal moves) that there's no way a computer can compute all the various possible moves and their outcomes in a time-controlled contest. Human players use strategies rather than brute calculation, but computer algorithms are notoriously weak at strategies.

That's why scientists agree that Weiqi is the best measure of a computer ability to 'think' like a human – artificial intelligence. And until a computer can be programmed to 'think', it will remain a mediocre Weiqi player.

I read in Wiki that Go is a game where you have to bait your Opponents to win? Something the computer can't do?

Strategy yes but it's still about pattern recognition and synthesis to apply the right strategy instinctively. Am I right to say that?
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Deep Blue, the world's best chess computer, has already beaten the world's all-time greatest player, Gary Kasparov.

In Weiqi (or Go), the world's best computer can only play at a level of 6 Dan, way below the top masters of 9 and 10 Dan. And the world's best Weiqi players are Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The best European players are only at 6 Dan.

Go figure.

Computers use brute strength - high speed and power to calculate billions of moves down the game-tree - to arrive at a no-loss move.

This approach works with checkers and even chess, because of their limited number of permutations. (The Chinook checkers program has already mastered checkers - it plays it perfectly every time so that it will never lose.)

On the other hand, Weiqi is so much more complex, with so many more permutations (at least 10^170 legal moves) that there's no way a computer can compute all the various possible moves and their outcomes in a time-controlled contest. Human players use strategies rather than brute calculation, but computer algorithms are notoriously weak at strategies.

That's why scientists agree that Weiqi is the best measure of a computer ability to 'think' like a human – artificial intelligence. And until a computer can be programmed to 'think', it will remain a mediocre Weiqi player.




Interesting and why are ang moh weiqi players well below the east asian ones? Wonder if anyone will come in to complain since ang moh players are below the asian ones. Oh yes one excuse weiqi is a stupid game.
 

Boliao

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thats it. Lets import more tiongs.

These are the Ah Tiongs that will NEVER come to Singapore.

I've met many brilliant Chinese and beyond nationality pride and identity, they think Singapore is a dump for those that cannot make it in China; and our desperate crave for them makes Singapore disgusting.
 

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Deep Blue did not beat Gary Kasparov all the time.

In the last encounter in 1997, Deep Blue won the game with 2 win to one with 3 draws.

Kasparov had beaten a previous version of Deep Blue in 1996.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer)

Deep Blue II was much more powerful than Deep Blue I, using a more powerful supercomputer and improved algorithm. (Incidentally the scientist developing the program was from PRC.)

With Deep Blue II, it is widely acknowledged that computers have surpassed human players in chess. The best that a human player can do, if he plays perfectly, is to draw a game.
 

TenderLovingCare

Alfrescian
Loyal
Deep Blue II was much more powerful than Deep Blue I, using a more powerful supercomputer and improved algorithm. (Incidentally the scientist developing the program was from PRC.)

With Deep Blue II, it is widely acknowledged that computers have surpassed human players in chess. The best that a human player can do, if he plays perfectly, is to draw a game.

:smile: .. ... ... :wink:
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
These are the Ah Tiongs that will NEVER come to Singapore.

I've met many brilliant Chinese and beyond nationality pride and identity, they think Singapore is a dump for those that cannot make it in China; and our desperate crave for them makes Singapore disgusting.

That's not true. You can see many Ah Tiong chao muggers in our local schools and unis.
 

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Interesting and why are ang moh weiqi players well below the east asian ones? Wonder if anyone will come in to complain since ang moh players are below the asian ones. Oh yes one excuse weiqi is a stupid game.

Weiqi has a 3,000 - 4,000 year history in the East - invented in China, then spread to Korea and Japan. So these countries have a lot of tradition, tomes of ancient records of openings/midgames/endgames and skilful game strategies, and masters who pass on their skills to disciples. There are 10 million registered Go players in Japan alone.

Europe has only got into the game in last 2 decades, and has much fewer players, fewer professionals, fewer tournaments, so standards are much lower. Similar to the status of international chess in Asian countries compared to say, Russia or Eastern Europe.
 
Top