• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Brunei - The Only ASEAN Country With A Falling Living Standard

Borat

Alfrescian
Loyal
(Credit for this to mevetox of miricommunity)

The American GDP was worth $293.7 billion in 1950, it is $15,094 billion now. Similarly, the US GDP per capita was $9,573 in 1950, it is $48,386 now. The GDP and per capita of a country is (almost) always on the rise due to economic growth, but can this be translated into a proportionate rise in living standard?

You see, there was a time in the past when a bowl of noodle can be bought for $0.07 in Asia, such pricing is no longer possible now of course. Would you be surprised to know that someone earning $200/mth in 1920 might be considered richer than his counterpart earning $2,000/mth in 2011 due to the different purchasing power rates in 2 different eras? It is therefore, to accurately measure the real standard of living, we need to take inflation into account.

Today we will review the real living standard of the 10 ASEAN states. To do so, we compiled the real GDP per capita based on the constant year 2000 US Dollar purchasing power rate (PPR), which also take into account the inflation of each respective nations throughout the decades. Data is provided by the World Bank, with exception of Myanmar, whose data is from the IMF. Charts are created by the New York-based Trading Economics website, which provides economic data for 196 countries and territories.

1. Singapore
21mdrhh.jpg


The 1966 Singaporean nominal GDP per capita was $566 (approximately $4,000 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR) The city-state went through rapid economic expansion and mass industrialization upon independence, and since enjoyed a steady rise in living standard. In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $43,900 (around $32,500 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Singaporeans today are 8.1 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

2. Indonesia
znn67c.jpg


The 1966 Indonesian (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was around $200. The largest and most populous nation in Southeast Asia, Indonesia witnessed a steady improvement in living standard until a brief interruption in the Asian financial crisis 1997-98. The country soon resumed its rapid economic growth as multinationals identified Indonesia as the third low-cost production base in Asia (after China and India) In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $2,980 (around $1,170 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Indonesians today are 5.9 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

3. Thailand
ra9bpi.jpg


The 1966 Thais (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was around $490. In mid-1980s, the Thai government opened up the country's economy to international trade, leading to rapid economic growth and industrial expansion, but crumbled under the 1997-98 crisis. It wasn't until 2001 that Thailand regained momentum over the baht and economy, and resumed growth. In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $4,990 (around $2,730 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Thais today are 5.6 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

4. Malaysia
28vdhmv.jpg


The 1966 Malaysian (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was around $1,000. Mass industrialization took place in 1980s-90s which catapulted the living standard of Malaysia to that of mid-income level. The economy, like many other Southeast Asian states, was interrupted in 1997-98, but resumed growth later as the nation's industries matured into a more high-tech platform. In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $8,420 (around $5,200 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Malaysians today are 5.2 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

5. Cambodia
2uhshz5.jpg


The 1966 Cambodian (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was around $160. The nation had always been considered the slowpoke of ASEAN economy due to instability, civil violence and political infighting, but this changed in 1999 when peace was restored, leading to rapid economic progress in the last decade. In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $753 (around $800 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Cambodians today are 5 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

6. Vietnam
2r4r251.jpg


Vietnam was not a united country until 1975, after the devastating Vietnam War. Reliable data could only be obtained in 1984, which put the Vietnamese (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita at around $200. Economy took off only after the 1986 reform, that shifted Vietnam from a highly-centralized planned economy to a socialist-oriented market economy. In 2010, the (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was approximately $730. We can therefore say that the Vietnamese today are 3.7 times richer than their peers 25 years ago. The nominal GDP per capita of Vietnam was estimated at $85 in 1975 and $1,374 in 2011, unadjusted for inflation.

7. Laos
35mnuhe.jpg


In 1975, communist government took power in Laos and closed down the economy, only to begin decentralizing control and encouraged private enterprise in 1986. Reliable data could only be obtained in 1984, which put the Lao (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita at around $210. The Lao government opened up the country to the world only by 1990s, and witnessed a steady increase in living standard since. In 2010, the (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was approximately $560. We can therefore say that the Lao today are 2.7 times richer than their peers 25 years ago. The nominal GDP per capita of Laos was estimated at $77 in 1966 and $1,203 in 2011, unadjusted for inflation.

8. Myanmar
bbx4i.jpg


In 1962, military government seized power in Myanmar and mismanaged the economy, transforming the once prosperous economy into Southeast Asia's poorest. Reliable data could only be obtained in 1980, which put the Burmese (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita at around $180. The 1989 imprisonment of Aung San Suu Kyi led to international sanction, which pretty much collapsed the economy. Since 2000s, huge investments from China has been propping up the economy. The country recently freed Aung San Suu Kyi, liberalized and reformed its economic structure, and again opened up to the world in 2011, leading to a more optimistic future growth. In 2010, the (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was approximately $480, while still below the 1989 height, we can say that the Burmese today are 2.7 times richer than their peers 30 years ago. There is insufficient data concerning the nominal GDP per capita of Myanmar in the 1960s.

9. Philippines
icr4ie.jpg


The 1966 Filipino (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was around $700. Due to mismanagement and rampant corruption, the country suffered an economic collapse in the 1980s, which it would recover only by 2000 onwards. Since then, the Philippines has seen a sharp rise in living standard with foreign investments and trade blossoming, and trade flourished. In 2010, the nominal GDP per capita was $2,120 (around $1,380 when adjusted to year 2000 USD PPR, which took into account of inflation) We can therefore say that the Filipinos today are 2 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

10. Brunei
sy7ejt.jpg


Brunei was the last ASEAN state to go independence, in 1984. Reliable data could only be obtained in 1974, which put the Bruneian (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita at around $23,000. Due to oil boom, Brunei had been the richest state in Southeast Asia since the 1960s until the Singaporean surpassed in early 2000s. The 1970s energy crisis and oil price shock made Brunei's per capita more than 5 times richer than Singapore, and was permanently being associated with the word 'rich' since then. Failure to diversify economy and little developmental progress however, has seen the Bruneian GDP per capita fallen steadily from its 1970s peak, with the decline persisting even today. In 2009, the (year 2000 USD PPR) GDP per capita was approximately $17,000. We can therefore say that the Bruneians today are 26% poorer than their peers 35 years ago. The nominal GDP per capita of Brunei was estimated at $1,275 (2.3 times Singapore's) in 1966 and $36,583 in 2011, unadjusted for inflation.

The Bruneian chart painted a completely different pattern than its ASEAN peers. While other ASEAN states reveal an upward trajectory movement, Brunei, on the other hand, shows a downward-spiral decline.


Other Asian states

1. China
v8eoo8.jpg


In what was defined as the greatest industrial expansion in histories of mankind, China's real GDP per capita rose from $120 in 1966 to $2,410 in 2010, making the average Chinese today 20 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

2. India
2zp8pkn.jpg


Another fast-growing economy in Asia, the living standard performance in India, however, is unimpressive if compared to China. Once richer than China, at a GDP per capita (year 2000 USD PPR) of $200 in 1966, India trailed badly behind China with only $830 in 2010. Nevertheless, the average Indians today are 4.2 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

3. Japan
2mx1py0.jpg


After few decades of strong economic growth, the Japanese economy crashed in 1990s, sending the country into a still ongoing 2-decade stagnation. Living standard however, maintained, as Japan suffered from deflation (the opposite of inflation) In 1966, the real GDP per capita (year 2000 USD PPR) was $13,000 and $39,800 by 2010. We can therefore say that the average Japanese today are 3.1 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

4. South Korea
213l1k.jpg


Massive industrialization and rapid economic expansion had solidly boosted the living standard of South Korea in the past 5 decades. In 1966, the real GDP per capita (year 2000 USD PPR) of South Korea was $1,800. By 2010 it had grown to $16,400 making the average Koreans today 9.1 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.

5. Taiwan
2aewnd1.jpg


As Taiwan emerged as a global IT manufacturing hub, its living standard likewise, improved. In 1980, the real GDP per capita (year 2000 USD PPR) of Taiwan was $2,400. By 2010 it has grown to $17,800 making the average Taiwanese today 7.4 times richer than their peers 30 years ago.

6. Hong Kong
34ffwq0.jpg


Hong Kong has replaced Tokyo as Asia's most important financial center, and real estate has boomed above pre-1997 level. Unsurprisingly this mean a steady rise in living standard. Being Singapore's closest rival, Hong Kong has been lagging behind the lion city since 1990. GDP per capita (year 2000 USD PPR) was $5000, this has risen to $35,300 in 2010, making HongKongers 7.1 times richer than their peers 45 years ago.


Source:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator

http://dsbb.imf.org/pages/sdds/FISSpecs.aspx
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Notice that despite being the best paid govt in the world to the tune of milions a year, the FAP's performance can at best be considered to be average and certainly appalling if the gap between the rich and poor is taken into consideration. This then begs the question - who are they to tell SGs that it is 'dangerous' to raise wages without increase in productivity?
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
brunei got free education, health care, free housing and zero income tax.
everyone owns car and petrol is cheap.
how to migrant to brunei?
 

Borat

Alfrescian
Loyal
Most resource-rich countries do not perform as well as those countries with lesser resources as can be seen from the studies. Brunei is relying on their oil to maintain their standards of living and will collapse when their oil wells run dry. They should start investing more on other industries if they intend to keep up with the rest of their neighbours.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
brunei got free education, health care, free housing and zero income tax.
everyone owns car and petrol is cheap.
how to migrant to brunei?

They are super muslim. I wonder if it's an islamic state but they are very strict on entertainment and so on and they discriminate the chinese over there even more. Are you a malay?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Notice that despite being the best paid govt in the world to the tune of milions a year, the FAP's performance can at best be considered to be average and certainly appalling if the gap between the rich and poor is taken into consideration.

There is nothing wrong with having a wide gap between the rich and the poor. The large "gini" index was given a bad label by the West but there is absolutely no need for Singapore, an Asian country, to follow Western norms.

The West believes in egalitarianism and human dignity. On the other hand, Asia recognises the fact that wealth must have its privileges and that the flaunting of wealth is part of parcel of the culture. That's the reason why more Mercs and Ferraris are being sold in Asia than anywhere else in the world.

The more the lower rungs of society are paid, the more the upper echelons of society have to pay for services and the harder it is for them to hire people willing to do service jobs.

In countries like Indonesia or Thailand, a bank manager will have a driver, a gardener, a cook and a maid for washing and ironing. In Singapore, all a bank manager can afford is a foreign maid. If the poor in Singapore earned less than $300 per month, Singapore could send all the foreign maids home tomorrow and the benefits of doing so would be tremendous. Middle and upper class Singaporeans could then hire Singaporeans as maids and drivers and life would be a lot easier for the successful amongst us.

Don't allow Western liberal drivel to influence your Asian values. Singaporeans should proudly march to their own drum beat and not allow Western propaganda about pay equality to undermine Singapore society.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In countries like Indonesia or Thailand, a bank manager will have a driver, a gardener, a cook and a maid for washing and ironing. In Singapore, all a bank manager can afford is a foreign maid. If the poor in Singapore earned less than $300 per month, Singapore could send all the foreign maids home tomorrow and the benefits of doing so would be tremendous. Middle and upper class Singaporeans could then hire Singaporeans as maids and drivers and life would be a lot easier for the successful amongst us.

Don't allow Western liberal drivel to influence your Asian values. Singaporeans should proudly march to their own drum beat and not allow Western propaganda about pay equality to undermine Singapore society.

OK nigger :biggrin:
 

Nice-Gook

Alfrescian
Loyal
I dun mind converting to Islam to marry 4 wives

Being a Muslim gets you nowhere in Brunei.Half their work force are Malay Muslims from Indonesia/Malaysia and Indian/Bangladeshi/Pakistani Muslims.

The Malay Muslims from malaysia are treated as 3rd class whereas Malaysian Chinese(from Sarawak n Sabah)are treated 2nd class.Same category as Brunei Chinese who holds Yellow I/C.(yellow I/C is equivalent to our pink I/C)...most other Chinese who were born in Brunei for generation are stateless--til today.Indonesian Muslims are way below the totem pole --like the untouchables of India.

Even among the Malay local Brunei citizenship ,a distinction is drawn between a 'pengaran' even if he or she is a pauper.They are considered linked to royalty by blood even though there are thousands of them.
 

Unrepented

Alfrescian
Loyal
Brunei is not just about oil. They have lots of other untapped natural resources. Sinkieland will disappear before they do.

Most resource-rich countries do not perform as well as those countries with lesser resources as can be seen from the studies. Brunei is relying on their oil to maintain their standards of living and will collapse when their oil wells run dry. They should start investing more on other industries if they intend to keep up with the rest of their neighbours.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Being a Muslim gets you nowhere in Brunei.Half their work force are Malay Muslims from Indonesia/Malaysia and Indian/Bangladeshi/Pakistani Muslims.

The Malay Muslims from malaysia are treated as 3rd class whereas Malaysian Chinese(from Sarawak n Sabah)are treated 2nd class.Same category as Brunei Chinese who holds Yellow I/C.(yellow I/C is equivalent to our pink I/C)...most other Chinese who were born in Brunei for generation are stateless--til today.Indonesian Muslims are way below the totem pole --like the untouchables of India.

Even among the Malay local Brunei citizenship ,a distinction is drawn between a 'pengaran' even if he or she is a pauper.They are considered linked to royalty by blood even though there are thousands of them.

WTF!!!!???????:eek: chinese malaysians are treated better than mudland malays? I praise brunei for this but for discriminating chinese it's still a fucking country.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
GDP per capita measured in constant US dollars is an indicator for comparing standard of living vis-a-vis nations, but its computation is inherently flawed because the US dollar has been depreciating vis-a-vis nearly every other currency for nearly a decade.

Let us assume that does not matter. Think about your daily expenses and large capital purchases in Singapore. Turns out to be housing (HDB), transportation (car), and education (children or personal upgrading). Can you import HDB flats? Or COEs for that matter?

Turns out what really needs to be examined is how much of GDP are allocated to household income. In an earlier post several months ago, I probably mentioned that the beneficiaries of GDP is split between households, businesses and government.

How much are you getting out of that economic pie? Ask the common man in the street, and he will tell you businesses and the government are squeezing him dry. If it ain't so, time for the PAP to refute these baseless allegations.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is nothing wrong with having a wide gap between the rich and the poor. The large "gini" index was given a bad label by the West but there is absolutely no need for Singapore, an Asian country, to follow Western norms.

The Gini coefficient muddles issues. There is a huge discrepancy between returns on labour and returns on capital, and the highest earners (outside of banking) are owners of capital. Government has a duty to address the issues amicably between the two parties, yet they are in some instances conflicted.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The Gini coefficient muddles issues. There is a huge discrepancy between returns on labour and returns on capital, and the highest earners (outside of banking) are owners of capital. Government has a duty to address the issues amicably between the two parties, yet they are in some instances conflicted.

This situation isn't unique to Singapore. It occurs in all big cities where space is a premium.
 
Top