KNNCCB TO U !! U go out got langga by lorry .TIU LE MA CHOW HEI ! HA HA HA
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Are we better off now than 5 years or 10 years ago?
- Thread starter enterprise2
- Start date
KNNCCB TO U !! U go out got langga by lorry .TIU LE MA CHOW HEI ! HA HA HA
typical loser. vulgar, obscene, profane and useless idiot. no brains.no eyes.no ears.no nose.no nothing but only an anal mouth.
The truth is that some are better off but the majority are not having a better life. I think it all started with the change in leadership when Goh Chok Tong became the seat warmer for Pinky. Then came the Asian Financial Crisis that bankrupted a number of businesses.
you see what i mean...losers resort to stupid and mindless zappings and stupid infractions by that gay necrophilic laksaboy!!!
IB your shit head lah! use your blains if u have any shithole!!!
10 years or even 5 years ago,got health spa galore! Not all closed already. Now, that's a major worse off!!
Its a very good question. On paper, the economic gains are obvious. Incomes have risen, we are among the highest per capita countries in the world, asset prices have risen, etc. Singaporeans are wealthier than ever before. We are richer than many 1st world nations. These are all good but Singapore has had 4-5% inflation in the past 3 years and per capita incomes have not kept pace with increasing per capita GDP, so to the avg Singaporean things have not changed. You can thank inflation.
Singaporeans should be asking themselves some serious questions. In other developed nations the domestic economy is important but its not the core emphasis of the government. That is the main problem facing Singapore today. In the past we developed our manufacturing base, then we diversified. We opened our markets and have a sound banking system. Then we built the Casinos. Currently we are importing economic growth through our "immigration" policies which has strained public resources, damaged the environment and caused public discontent. COEs are high, public transport is an issue, and the march to a population of 6.5M continues. But the question is why?
Singapore is developed. Why should we continue the same economic policies that continue to place the economy before the people? We have already made it. What's wrong with 3-4% economic growth per year? Do we really want smaller homes, sitting in traffic jams in cars with COEs that cost 100K, and high inflation? There are now so many people our personal space is scarce. And it will get worse. We are becoming another Hong Kong.
Whoever places the economy #2 and the people first is the one to vote for. Its time for political, economic, and social reform in Singapore.
ministars earn millions and we got a lot of millionaires, so i'd say they r better off
the rest, are worse than the worst, cos we got no life, work till die, no life to live, just work, pay and pay,
so no we r not better off, tiongs and shits everywhere and m&ds still blur, chinkpore is one smelly fart, the world should take some laxative to expel this bad fart out.
the rest, are worse than the worst, cos we got no life, work till die, no life to live, just work, pay and pay,
so no we r not better off, tiongs and shits everywhere and m&ds still blur, chinkpore is one smelly fart, the world should take some laxative to expel this bad fart out.
Political stability is overrated ...how has that helped sinkees? Not many sinkees made money, only at most the top 20 percent. Yes, 80 percent of sinkees have been cheated and should fight back in every way to force change.
Companies will lobby for more imported growth thats for sure.
Developers will want more smaller homes.
Higher COEs will reflect more economic activity.
Policy makers have their bonuses/salaries tied to GDP/salary of the above.
i totally agree unlike here where some forummers are more equal than others....haha
some got bigger vulval mouths with gun powder inside them. they have diplomatic immunity. and of course
you see rabid dogs running around barking and biting mindlessly at innocent and weak forummers. right or not?
as a whole sg is not better off. its getting harder to do biz now. and things are more expensive and the jam makes even a tiong whore look attractive. and the 'legalised corruption' makes china look like switzerland.
so we are not better off
so we are not better off
A bit late to respond but there is a truism in what you have said that I wish to highlight. Anything the PAP can import, prices remain competitive (eg. foreign labour, which depresses wage growth obviously). Anything they cannot, grows by leaps and bounds (housing, food, electricity). Double whammy caused by the greed of local enterprises and landlords. Perpetrators need be subdued!
You are a very lucky man. No inflation.
Just look at the thread title. There is a question there.
Avast
New Member
If this the case, then you will still be affected by their policies that benefit only them and the minority. Not everyone falls into the minority category. The question is how long are you going to turn a blind eye when the fire is licking your butts once more.
I totally disagree. 7 seats is too few to lose for those gripes felt by 40% of the population. I disagree with the lack of decency to give this 40% a bigger say. And this is not a laughing matter. Sob sob.
Similar threads
