methinks that when they say decentralized, they mean out of the hands of government. So basically instead of having your $$$ printed and controlled by gahmen, it could be printed by any old fuck with a barely interesting name and controlled by any fucking idiot who claims to be a guru.
It's basically an anti-centralized
government thing. Not an anti-centralized thing.
Something that evades a lot of people including the anti-government types here and in other forums is why governments exist in the 1st place. They didn't spring up overnight because of some plot by the Rothschilds or the fact that people are sheep. And if they are operating correctly, they are likely to piss of quite a few people in the process.
I've seen various forms of government and studied a few and what I can tell you is this. A lot of twits have no fucking idea what they are asking for. And since you know tech stuff so well, I'm sure you can come up with an appropriate analogy. But this is exactly one of those cases where people have no idea what they are asking for. They are fed up with governments and their policies and their fiat money so fuck them, we're going to de-centralize from the gahmen. See how well that turned out? Socialism is another example as well. I can write pages and pages on this, but I hesitate to shove my thoughts onto other people unless directly asked as you did.
If you have thoughts, please share them first, but if you want my direct opinion, I will give it.
