Is the thread starter "chorut" a retard? Its called medal count and 37 is more than 34. Is this twit studying PRC maths?
chorut said:No wonder Yahoo is a has-been and will die a natural death soon than later.
WTF? Ranking by total medals is brain-fucked stupid really.
Is the thread starter "chorut" a retard? Its called medal count and 37 is more than 34. Is this twit studying PRC maths?
They don't always do the ranking by medals. Sometimes they do it by golds. It all depends. You know what I mean?
The Olympics has always been about the GOLD medals. Nobody cares who won the silver and bronze medals. If you are not first, it is the same as coming in last.
throughout modern day olympic history, USA follow the IOC count - using gold medals to rank nations
only after 2008 onwards, they change to total number of medals , just so that they top the chart, more precisely their own version of the medal table. No one is retard to use total medal chart, just by the fact they change it only after 2008, prove that they cannot accept losing to china. and yes USA full of retards in journalism.
the people who support this medal table in singapore also are retard
No use. Yahoo lan lan. Now china are tops both in gold and total medals.
You better mind your manners, besides you're making a total fool of yourself. This is how Medal Count format is presented by the Official Olympics Site and many other sites on the internet, including Google:
http://iG][/QUOTE]
Excuse me? you are the insecure twit who cannot seem to understand that the USA has more medals, i.e. wins than the PRCs at the end of day 6.