Serious XiJinPing's DF-41 tops USA & Russian ICBMs, no match!

[nkfnkfnkf]

XiJinPing does not display it at Tian An Men parade. but deployed them secretively and closely hidden the information. Recent testes including from railroad trains and TEL trucks. Intelligence reveled not only DF-41 is world's longest range ICBM but also the most penetrating ICBM against interception / defense systems. The surprise include it being 4 staged rocket instead of 3, and it separates into multiple vehicles much earlier in it's trajectory - almost as it leaves Chinese air space, and atmosphere of earth, each ICBM becomes multiple vehicles to travel apart from one another. This strategy is the most effective in counter-interception. There are 10 separately targeting nuke warheads and array of Decoys, all at hypersonic speed, and taking evasive random trajectories, independent of each other. Defense / Interception resources are going to be over-saturated and overwhelmed.

This new DF-41 capabilities exceeds Putin's YARS and TOPOL-M, and way way exceed Obama's Minuteman. It takes care of business within 30 mins max.

https://www.rt.com/news/340359-china-test-ballistic-missile/

China tests ICBM capable of striking US within half an hour
Published time: 20 Apr, 2016 12:33
Get short URL
© Anton Denisov
© Anton Denisov / Sputnik
Beijing has successfully tested a new long-range ballistic missile capable of engaging any potential target worldwide. The rocket takes just 30 minutes to cover its maximum 12,000km range and can deliver multiple strikes on any nuclear-capable state.

The launch of China’s Dongfeng-41 (East Wind, DF-41) missile was registered by the US satellite tracking system in real time, the Washington Free Beacon reports, although the location of the launch was not immediately revealed. The launch was made from a new road-mobile platform, and is reportedly the seventh test-firing of the DF-41.
Read more
Military vehicles carrying shore-to-ship missiles drive past the Tiananmen Gate during a military parade to mark the 70th anniversary of the end of World War Two, in Beijing, China, September 3, 2015 © Str China marks 70th V-Day anniversary with spectacular parade (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

American experts estimate the DF-41 to be an 80-ton, three-stage solid-fuel missile capable of carrying between six and 10 nuclear warheads.

The test was made with a DF-41 missile armed with two independently targetable reentry vehicles.

“As with previous MIRV tests, the PLA has used a small number of reentry vehicles to mask the real capability of the DF-41, which is estimated to be able to loft up to 10 warheads,” the WFB cited China military affairs analyst Rick Fisher as saying.

China allegedly tested its deadliest nuclear missile on April 13 – about the time when the People’s Liberation Army's high-ranking Gen. Fan Changlong headed a group of military commanders to inspect construction work at a man-made island in the Spratly Islands group. The exact date of the visit was not officially announced.

The test reportedly took place three days before US Defense Secretary Ash Carter visited the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis, operating in the South China Sea close to the disputed Spratly Islands claimed by Beijing.

Xi warns Obama against threatening China’s sovereignty & national interests https://t.co/xxIjvyOTgCpic.twitter.com/vhlBbWMPtZ
— RT (@RT_com) April 1, 2016

The first information about the third generation Chinese ballistic missile – which according to the WFB is capable of reaching any location within the US – emerged in the American media in July 2014.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, the Chinese military staged its previous DF-41 ballistic missile test launch on December 5, 2015, when a missile was launched from a container mounted on a special railroad car.

“China is re-engineering its long-range ballistic missiles to carry multiple nuclear warheads,” the WFB cited Adm. Cecil Haney of the US Strategic Command as saying on January 22 of this year.

In 2015, Kanwa Asian Defence magazine claimed that Beijing might add the DF-41 to its nuclear inventory as early as 2016.

by Taboola
Sponsored Links

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

[video=youtube_share;5naw0B_0SEg]https://youtu.be/5naw0B_0SEg[/video]

[video=youtube_share;h2kjMctT8yU]https://youtu.be/h2kjMctT8yU[/video]

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

https://www.rt.com/news/347313-putin-us-missile-defense-nuclear/

Putin: ‘We know when US will get new missile threatening Russia’s nuclear capability’
Published time: 18 Jun, 2016 23:05
Get short URL
June 17,2016. President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with heads of large foreign companies and business associations during the 20th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. © Sergey Guneev
June 17,2016. President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with heads of large foreign companies and business associations during the 20th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. © Sergey Guneev / Sputnik
The US anti-missile defense systems being installed near Russia’s borders can be “inconspicuously” transformed into offensive weapons, Vladimir Putin has said, adding that he knows “year by year” how Washington will develop its missile program.

Talking about NATO’s ballistic missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, Russia’s president said that the Americans are now deploying their missiles at these military complexes.

“The missiles are put into a capsule used for launches of sea-based Tomahawk missiles. Now they are placing their antimissiles there, which are capable of engaging a target at a distance of up to 500 kilometers [310 miles]. But technologies are developing, and we know around what year the Americans will get a new missile, which will have a range not of 500 kilometers, but 1,000, and then even more – and from that moment they will start threatening our nuclear capability,” Putin said at a meeting with the heads of international news agencies at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) on Friday.
Read more
© Osman Orsal Turkey, Romania & Poland determined to expand US missile defense in Europe – Ankara

“We know year by year what will happen, and they know that we know,” he said, adding that Western officials “pull the wool over [their news outlets] eyes,” who in turn misinform their audiences.

The main problem, according to the Russian president, is that people do not understand how potentially dangerous the situation really is. “The world is being pulled into a completely new dimension, while [Washington] pretends that nothing’s happening,” Putin said, adding that he has been trying to reach out to his counterparts, but in vain.

READ MORE: US refuses to discuss missile defense, seeks security at cost of others – Russian Defense Ministry

“They say [the missile systems] are part of their defense capability, and are not offensive, that these systems are aimed at protecting them from aggression. It’s not true,” Putin told the journalists, adding that “strategic ballistic missile defense is part of an offensive strategic capability, [and] functions in conjunction with an aggressive missile strike system.”

The “great danger” is that the same launchers that are used for defense missiles can be used to fire Tomahawks that can be installed “in a matter of hours,” Putin noted. “How do we know what’s inside those launchers? All one needs to do is reprogram [the system], which is an absolutely inconspicuous task,” he said, adding that the governments of the nations on whose territories these NATO complexes are based would have no way of knowing if this had happened.
Read more
© Maksim Blinov ‘We hold no grudge’ & Putin’s other Friday SPIEF highlights on key intl issues

Washington engaged in deception from the very start when it claimed that it was moving its ballistic missile defense east to counter “Iran’s nuclear threat,” Putin said, pointing out that Tehran’s alleged offensive nuclear capability now doesn’t exist – largely thanks to President Obama’s involvement. “So why have they now built a missile defense system in Romania?” he asked.

READ MORE: Putin: Romania ‘in crosshairs’ after opening NATO missile defense base

While pointing out that NATO keeps rejecting “concrete” proposals from Russia on cooperation, Putin said that US policy is now jeopardizing “the so-called strategic balance... thanks to which the world has been safe from large-scale wars and military conflicts.”

By unilaterally withdrawing from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Washington “struck the first colossal blow at international stability,” the president said. To maintain the balance, Moscow has had to develop its own missile program in turn, to which the US agreed in the beginning of the 2000s, when Russia was in a difficult financial situation.

“I guess they hoped that the armament from the Soviet times would initially become degraded,” he said.

“Today Russia has reached significant achievements in this field. We have modernized our missile systems and successfully developed new generations. Not to mention missile defense systems,” Putin told the international news agencies, stressing that these moves are counter-measures and not “aggression,” as Moscow is so often accused of.

READ MORE: Shift to multipolar world: Lavrov says Russia working to adjust foreign policy to new reality

“We must provide security not only for ourselves. It’s important to provide strategic balance in the world, which guarantees peace on the planet... It’s the mutual threat that has provided [mankind] with global security for decades,” Putin concluded.

 

[jinjiaho]

Useless with internal strifles brewing in the country!

South China Morning Post - China feed
Tense atmosphere in Chinese village after hundreds of police officers involved in operation to arrest leader ahead of land seizure protest
by admin / Today, 8:29 AM

Plainclothes officers and police in riot gear stepped up patrols on the streets of Wukan in southern China on Sunday after hundreds of police were deployed in the early hours of the morning in an operation to arrest a village chief.

 

[war is best form of peace]

Useless with internal strifles brewing in the country!

South China Morning Post - China feed
Tense atmosphere in Chinese village after hundreds of police officers involved in operation to arrest leader ahead of land seizure protest
by admin / Today, 8:29 AM

Plainclothes officers and police in riot gear stepped up patrols on the streets of Wukan in southern China on Sunday after hundreds of police were deployed in the early hours of the morning in an operation to arrest a village chief.

A true BRUTALITY REGIME will OVERCOME far more many problems, including external and internal enemies. Deliver deaths and hurt effectively rapidly and accurately. Problems vanished completely! HUAT AH!

 

[syed putra]

This proves that chinese are murderous lot just like how they murdered innocents by communist party of malaya. That is why umno wants to send them back as they are nothing but trouble.
Even today, they hype about race riots when more were killed by communist terrorists.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

This proves that chinese are murderous lot just like how they murdered innocents by communist party of malaya. That is why umno wants to send them back as they are nothing but trouble.
Even today, they hype about race riots when more were killed by communist terrorists.

In the 1st place you must learn history how China is formed, how it came about.

China was progressively formed by ELIMINATION of Smaller Weaker Countries, carnage their people, conquer and ANNEX them all. One after another. That is THE NATURAL Way.


Today's Civilization is WRONGFULLY STUPID, and especially idiotic USA & UN want to maintain their vision of FIXED WORLD MAP, and arbitrarily award Sovereign Rights to each countries regardless weather they have any ability to survive or not. In a natural world big and strong countries eliminates the small and weak countries, carnage their people and take over their resources - naturally and rightfully. Civilized morons ruined entire world. They must be punished and eliminated.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

To ensure a GOOD FUCK, ICBMs comes in with lots of KY lubricants called Penetration Aid. Their purposes is to defeat missile defense interception.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penetration_aid

Penetration aid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A penetration aid (or "penaid") is a device or tactic used to increase an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) warhead's chances of penetrating a target's defenses.

These can consist of both physical devices carried within the ICBM (as part of its payload), as well as tactics that accompany its launch or flight path, and may include one or more of the following (and more) concepts :

the missile booster can have a short burn time, and/or (if existing) the MIRV bus carrying the nuclear warheads can have some form of stealth technology, thereby hindering detection before the warhead reentry vehicles are released.
MIRV and MRV (instead of single warhead missiles) are themselves largely improving penetration since there are as many more warheads to destroy than missiles, which may saturate the defensive system's stock of weapons. However these technologies are very demanding since they require the ability to highly miniaturize warheads and, for MIRV, to master the art of accurately dispensing each warhead and possibly other payload elements (penaids...) in what is often designated as the post-boost phase or payload deployment phase.
Incidental or deliberate fragmentation of the final-stage rocket booster can cloud the enemy's radar by projecting a radar cross-section much larger than the actual missile and/or creating a large amount of false tracks.[1]
chaff wires may be deployed over a large area of space, creating a large, radar-reflecting object that will obscure incoming warheads from defensive radar.
radar jammers are active radio transmitters that can be deployed on the decoys and the warhead to jam the frequencies used by defensive radars or literally blind them from seeing any warheads around.
decoys such as mylar balloons that can be inflated in space and are designed to have the same radar characteristics as the warhead. Because the warhead and the decoy balloons may be at different temperatures, the warhead and the balloons may both be surrounded by heated shrouds that put them all at the same temperature. This defeats attempts to discriminate between decoys and warheads on the basis of temperature, which can confuse an enemy's missile defense systems.
reentry decoys, consisting of very small reentry bodies that mimic the decelerating trajectory and radar signature of a warhead during atmospheric reentry, force the defense system to spend many interceptor weapons on fake targets instead of warheads.
nuclear radar blackout over the target area can be created : one nuclear device may be deliberately exploded in space by the attacker in order to provide a radar blackout that will allow subsequent warheads to pass through the enemy's defenses undetected.
maneuvering reentry vehicles (instead of symmetrical shape warheads) induce lateral drag during reentry and hence strongly bends the trajectory, thus deceiving lower altitude interceptor systems that generally assume a straight decelerating trajectory and which have a limited teminal guidance maneuverability and course correction capability (especially hit-to-kill or conventional warhead interceptors). This has some penalty in terms of decreased attacking warhead accuracy on the target (unless the reentry vehicle has an active guidance and control system onboard, which is quite complex to master).

Carrying such devices has a price in terms of payload weight and volume, which requires a compromise versus warhead size and numbers onboard, as well as missile range.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

https://www.sott.net/article/318032-Russias-new-ICBM-Sarmat-can-penetrate-defense-shields

Russia's new ICBM Sarmat can penetrate defense shields

Sputnik
Tue, 10 May 2016 23:57 UTC

© Sputnik
Missile defense system
The best current missile defenses system may prove powerless against Sarmat, Russia's new intercontinental ballistic missile, which will be ready for field trials this summer, according to the Russian news network Zvezda. The new ballistic missile, Sarmat, may render all current missile defense systems obsolescent, the Russian news network Zvezda reported.

The RS-28 Sarmat is the state-of-the-art heavy liquid-propelled intercontinental ballistic missile which is currently being developed for the Russian army.

It is designed to replace the old Soviet R-36M missiles Voevoda, codenamed 'Satan' by NATO, as the heavy silo-based component of Russia's nuclear deterrence. The RS-28 has been in development since 2009 and is scheduled to start replacing the old ICBMs in 2018.

The broadcaster added that the RS-28 is capable of wiping out parts of the earth the size of Texas or France, and that its higher speed performance will enable it to speed past every missile defense system in existence.

Although there is very little information on the technical characteristics of the new missile, some sources said that the Sarmat is a two-stage missile with an estimated operational range of 10,000km and a mass of at least 100 tons, including a payload weighing from 4 tons up to 10 tons.

The missile will be equipped with a MIRVed combination of a dozen heavy warheads, each individually steerable during reentry. MIRV is an acronym for a multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle.

Sarmat warheads will have an array of advanced antimissile countermeasures meant to penetrate the US ABM shield. Speculation is rife that they would have a conventional hypersonic version like the US's Advanced Hypersonic Weapon or the Chinese WU-14 and could be used as a precision intercontinental weapon in a non-nuclear conflict.

The Russian Defense Ministry plans to put the Sarmat into service in late 2018 and complete replacing the Voevoda with the RS-28 by 2020.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

The USA Minuteman III ICBM is in a very pathetic state. Watch this video:


It's silo door won't even close!

Actually the design is world' poorest, and most likely to fail a launch. Because it is a horizontally sliding design. Sliding rail and rack and pinion mechanism are exposed and very vulnerable to both attacks as well as wear and tear.

How to visualize this failure is that they tot they build hundred tons heavy door to withstand direct nuke hit. YES! It might had protected the missile inside the silo to survive the hit. But IT IS AS GOOD AS BEEN DESTROYED because the door WON'T OPEN any more and thus WON'T LAUNCH!

The exposed rack and pinion and both sides' sliding rails would had been destroyed or damaged, hence JAMMING the super heavy door. How to launch ICBM when the door JAMMED? The whole defense is self-defeated!

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Why US ICBMs are so outdated?

http://www.daytondailynews.com/news...keep-finding-trouble-theyre-really-old/ngdmh/



Why nukes keep finding trouble: They’re really old
Billions of dollars aimed at modernizing the Minuteman force

By Robert Burns

Associated Press

The Air Force asserts with pride that the nation’s nuclear missile system, designed more than 40 years ago during the Cold War to counter the now-defunct Soviet Union, is safe and secure. None 0f the missiles has ever been used in combat or launched accidentally.

But the Air Force also admits that the system is fraying at the edges: Command posts are time worn, launch silos are corroded, support equipment is failing and an emergency-response helicopter fleet is so antiquated that a replacement was deemed “critical” years ago.

The Minuteman is no ordinary weapon. The business end of the missile can deliver mass destruction across the globe as quickly as you could have a pizza delivered to your doorstep.

But even through the Minuteman has been updated over the years and remains ready for launch on short notice, the items that support it are aging. That partly explains why missile corps morale has sagged and discipline has sometimes faltered, resulting in leadership, training, disciplinary and other problems in the ICBM force that have prompted worry at the highest levels of the Pentagon.

The airmen who operate, maintain and guard the Minuteman force at bases in North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming see a gap between the Air Force’s claim that the nuclear mission is “Job 1” and its willingness to invest in it.

“One of the reasons for the low morale is that the nuclear forces feel unimportant, and they are often treated as such, very openly,” said Michelle Spencer, a defense consultant in Alabama who led a nuclear forces study for the Air Force published in 2012. She said in an interview that the airmen — called Missileers — became disillusioned by an obvious but unacknowledged lack of interest in the nuclear force among the most senior Air Force leaders.

Spencer’s study found that Air Force leaders were “cynical about the nuclear mission, its future and its true — versus publicly stated — priority to the Air Force.” Several key leadership posts have since changed hands, and while Spencer said she sees important improvements, she’s worried about the Air Force’s commitment to getting the nuclear forces what they need.

This is no surprise to those responsible for nuclear weapons policy. An independent advisory group, in a report to the Pentagon last year, minced no words. It said the Air Force must show a “believable commitment” to modernizing the force.

“If the practice continues to be to demand that the troops compensate for manpower and skill shortfalls, operate in inferior facilities and perform with failing support equipment, there is high risk of failure,” it said.

Robert Goldich, a former defense analyst at the Congressional Research Service, said the ICBM force for years got “the short end of the stick” on personnel and resources.

“I honestly don’t think it’s much more complicated than that,” he said. “When that happened, people lost sight of how incredibly rigorous you’ve got to be to ensure quality control when nuclear weapons are involved.”

That may be changing. When Deborah Lee James became Air Force secretary, its top civilian official, in December, she quickly made her way to each of the three ICBM bases and came away with a conviction that rhetoric was not matched by resources.

“One thing I discovered is we didn’t always put our money where our mouth is when it comes to saying this is the No. 1 mission,” James told reporters June 30 during a return visit to F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming.

James said the fixes will require money — and a lot more. They will take more people and a major attitude adjustment.

“I happen to think the top thing that really drives an airman is feeling like they’re making a difference … protecting America,” she said earlier in June. Missileers ought to feel that way, she said, but she is not convinced they do. “And so, over time, we’ve got to change that around,” she said.

The Wright-Patterson Air Force Base-headquartered Air Force Materiel Command, which oversees the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center at Kirtland AFB, N.M., will spend billions of dollars to modernize the Minuteman force, according to Susan Murphy, an AFMC spokeswoman.

“The Air Force has recognized that its nuclear missile force requires improved sustainment and ongoing modernization,” she said in an email. “We’ve undertaken a multi-billion dollar effort that includes 33 acquisition programs either already completed, in progress or planned to modernize the overall Minuteman III system, from missiles to their launch facilities.”

Some of those acquisition programs, for example, cover a new ICBM missile fuze, security and communication upgrades, new vehicles to transport missile stages, support equipment and launch control center hardware, she added.

The Air Force Institute of Technology at Wright-Patterson teaches courses on the effects of nuclear weapons, nuclear proliferation and nuclear policy and strategy, but does not teach courses on nuclear weapons “per se,” nor does it provide direct training to Minuteman III crews, according to AFIT Chancellor Todd Stewart.

James said the Air Force will find $50 million in this year’s budget to make urgent fixes, and will invest an additional $350 million in improvements over the coming five years. Even that, she said, is unlikely to be enough, and more funds will be sought.

Her words are resonating with Maj. Steve Gorman, a maintenance operations squadron commander at Minot. He already is seeing signs of change, pointing to a recent decision to add 13 new maintenance positions at the base.

“That’s a huge thing for us,” Gorman said.

Since its initial deployment in 1970, the Minuteman 3 missile itself has been upgraded in all its main components. But much of the rest of the system that keeps the weapon viable and secure is deteriorating.

One example is the Huey helicopter fleet, which escorts road convoys that move Minuteman missiles, warheads and other key components. It also is the chief means of moving armed security forces into the missile fields in emergencies, even though it’s too slow, too small, too vulnerable to attack and cannot fly sufficient distances.

It’s also old — Vietnam War old.

The seven Hueys flown daily at Minot were built in 1969. The yearly cost of keeping them running has more than doubled over the past four years, according to Air Force statistics — from $12.9 million in 2010 to $27.8 million last year.

“Obviously we need a new helicopter, based on the mission,” said Maj. Gen. Jack Weinstein, who as commander of 20th Air Force is responsible for the operation, maintenance and security of the full fleet of Minuteman missiles.

That’s what the Air Force has been saying since at least 2006. A 2008 Air Force study cited a “critical need” to replace the Hueys “to mitigate missile field security vulnerabilities” and said this need had been identified two years earlier.

In an interview June 25 while visiting Minot, Weinstein said he was trying to persuade his superiors to buy a new fleet of more capable helicopters, but he said it was unclear whether that would happen before 2020.

Weinstein is more optimistic about other opportunities to fix his missile corps. He is implementing a “force improvement program” that was developed from hundreds of recommendations by rank-and-file ICBM force members. It is intended to begin erasing the perception that the nuclear mission is not a top priority, and to give the nuclear missile corps more people, money, equipment, training, educational opportunities and financial incentives.

Lt. Col. Brian Young, deputy commander of the 91st Maintenance Group at Minot, said he senses a turning point as top brass reach out to enlisted airmen and non-commissioned officers to solicit ideas about how to fix the force.

“This feels completely different than any initiative I’ve been associated with in my 22 years” in the Air Force, he said.

Staff writer Barrie Barber contributed to this story.

 

[3_M]

Most of these land based ICBM will likely be wiped out in the first wave of nuclear attack. The key towards winning a nuclear war lies in the second strike capability. China need not waste too much resources on DF41 but rather invest more in sub launch ICBM. It is a more powerful deterrent against nuclear attack.

 

[nkfnkfnkf]

Most of these land based ICBM will likely be wiped out in the first wave of nuclear attack. The key towards winning a nuclear war lies in the second strike capability. China need not waste too much resources on DF41 but rather invest more in sub launch ICBM. It is a more powerful deterrent against nuclear attack.

PRC and Russia adopts many road mobile TEL trucks for ICBMs, only the super heavy (around 100 tons) ones are in fixed silos. TELs and DECOY TELs moves on highway grids randomly. Very hard to track and hit them. They can stop anywhere and start to launch within just minutes. Sub SLBMs are subjected to very long down time approx 33%, or more if maintenance issues raised. Subs go out one round, have to be back in base for many weeks. Hence you need more subs for rotation. Subs usually are nuke subs, which are huge budget. And lots of complicated engineering works. Too many complicated and dangerous system packed into a very compact u-boat. Too easy to get trouble. They are essentially counter-strike purpose. The game is first striker wins the most, especially if you have intelligence of the locations of nuke subs, wipe them out during 1st strike, then you won your counter strike FOC already.

 

[tun_dr_m]

China said DF-41 deployment is completed, there are DF-41 TEL launchers allover whole China now.

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-12-01/doc-ifypikwt0523214.shtml

东风41导弹已接近部署到位 全国各地都有发射车身影
2017年12月01日 11:14 新浪军事


新浪扶翼 行业专区
　　中国于11月5日试射了最新型的东风41洲际核导弹，导弹准确命中了位于中国西部沙漠的靶场区，这也是中国从2012年以来第8次试射东风41，通过频繁试射，东风-41已经证明了可靠的核威慑能力，现在只剩下一个悬念，就是中国要装备多少枚东风41导弹。

　　近日，央视也罕见地披露了东风41弹道导弹的画面及研制细节。该导弹的射程可以覆盖地球每一个角落。 根据央视报道，东风41弹道导弹可能将于明年年初服役，导弹专家杨乘军专家还透露过东风41试射从无失败记录。东风41在6年时间内进行了8次试射，已经有条件定型服役，将在2018年大规模部署。后续将还会有新的试射验证导弹的可靠性。

　　杨承军的身份是中国导弹技术专家，核军控和核战略专家、量子防务首席科学家。东风-41是我国第四代战略导弹，是中国目前最先进的洲际弹道导弹，具有研制周期短，可靠性高，反应速度快，机动性能好，精度更高等特点。

　　我国的东风41性能与发达国家的第六代，如美国民兵-3和俄罗斯的白杨-M洲际弹道导弹基本相当，部分技术甚至已经超过它们。东风41具备井下发射、公路和铁路机动发射3种发射方式，采用数字式捷联惯导+北斗卫星导航制导，井下发射的命中精度约100米，野外无依托机动发射的命中精度约200米。推测东风41导弹可携带3枚、6枚或10枚分导式再入核弹头。

　　为了突破反导系统，东风41携带分导弹头的同时还能够释放诱饵弹，进行末端机动变轨。美国在近几年连续监测中国进行东风-41多弹头分导式洲际弹道导弹的试射，尤其是在2014年12月13日，美国宣布中国进行了携带10枚弹头的东风41导弹试射，高弹道的推算射程为12300公里。

　　由于东风41弹体重量巨大，已经达到了公路机动平台所能承受的极限，所以放弃了较复杂的冷发射而采用热发射，与冷发射相比，热发射对导弹本身的固体火箭发动机的质量要求较高，但是节省了发射载车上的有限空间。

　　专家说东风41将于明年服役，这应该是比较谦虚的说法。目前东风41已经很接近部署到位，进入战略值班状态。因为在去年，全国各地都有东风41机动发射车的身影，似乎正在进行涉及全国各地的大量真实环境测试。导弹发射系统在媒体上多次曝光。这说明中国火箭军已经在进行这一主力战略弹道导弹的实战化演练，包括了远离支持设施完善的发射测试基地，机动行驶到各个不同类型的国土区域。

　　东风41频繁亮剑，与美国的积极推进“核武改”有很大关系，美军新一代洲际导弹GBSD，下一代哥伦比亚级弹道导弹核潜艇计划都在紧锣密鼓进行着。对于中国而言，只有拥有对等的战略威慑力量，才能把战争的风险降到最低。东风41保卫世界和平的意义正在于此。（作者署名：科罗廖夫）

 

[tun_dr_m]

Meet PLA's future warrior cyborg terminator from an on going trade show / exhibition :

http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/l/slide_8_199_58007.html#p=1


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

1 / 18
“砥砺奋进的五年”大型成就展现场展出了中国未来士兵综合系统，该系统包含智能头盔、多功能作战服、智能武器、可穿戴再生能源采储系统、移动智能终端、柔性助力，还配备了无人机。（来源：lfx160219 烽火议军情）


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

2 / 18
新浪军事深度：随着地面、反恐作战成为各大国作战的主要模式，单兵作战危险性居高不下的难题开始被科学家们以新的黑科技破解，这就是单兵外骨骼系统。



外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

3 / 18
虽然在这方面美军走的比较远，但我国也不甘示弱，奋起直追。近年来，一款由202所研制的国产单兵外骨骼系统引起了参会者眼球。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

4 / 18
该单兵外骨骼系统公开的技术指标为：额定负重，35千克；额定搬运，50千克。在额定负重下单兵平均步速4.5千米/小时，可连续行走约20千米，与美国最新的单兵外骨骼相比略有差距。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

5 / 18
如美国洛马公司研发的HULC单兵外骨骼系统在负重90千克的情况下，可以4.8千米/小时的速度行走20千米。



外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

6 / 18
外骨骼一词来源于昆虫和壳类生物的坚硬外壳，人体外骨骼是一种可穿戴在人体外部，融入了先进的控制、信息和通信技术的人机电系统，可以为穿戴者提供防护、支撑作用，并提供一定的辅助动力和融合式信息接收，大大增强人体自身能力，使单兵成为战场超人。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

7 / 18
单兵外骨骼研发技术属人机结合工程，要求人体和外骨骼形成一个闭环系统，机器能感应到人的状态和运动，人能适应机器的作动。按照辅助人体的部位，单兵外骨骼系统可分为上肢外骨骼、下肢外骨骼、全身外骨骼和关节外骨骼，根据动力不同可分电机驱动、液压驱动、气动驱动和被动辅助。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

8 / 18
人类很早就有了发明外骨骼的想法，早在1890年，就有人设计出了一款装置辅助人行走。到 1970年，通用电气设计的Hardman系统，包含了30多个关节，能举起1500磅的重量。



外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

9 / 18
20世纪末期，随着电子技术、传感器技术和控制技术的飞速发展，外骨骼系统取得了历史性突破，雷声公司开发的XOS外骨骼系统，能帮助穿戴者轻易举起几百磅的物体数百次，这种系统由结构、传感器、执行器、控制器和高压液压系统组成。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

10 / 18
加州大学伯克利分校的下肢外骨骼系统（BLEEX）是自行供电的外骨骼，能增强穿戴者的耐力和力量，组成包括两个假腿、一个电源、一个背包状框和动力机构。BLEEX可以让人蹲下、弯腰、上坡和走路，在灵活性上有了很大提升。


外骨骼可比美军？中国未来士兵综合系统曝光
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.08 18:35:48

• 

11 / 18
麻省理工大学的外骨骼系统能够支撑人背负更多载荷，其通过脚部和膝盖上的传感器测量力的大小和方向，然后通过一种控制方式将重量传导到地面，会减轻负重40千克时人感觉到压力的40%，但会对人的正常走路姿势有所影响。

 

[yellowarse]

This proves that chinese are murderous lot just like how they murdered innocents by communist party of malaya. That is why umno wants to send them back as they are nothing but trouble.
Even today, they hype about race riots when more were killed by communist terrorists.

That's where you're wrong. Among the big powers, China is the only country to commit to a no-first-use (NFU) policy. The US has never committed to NFU, and the Russians ditched their NFU pledge in 1993 under Yeltsin.

China has repeatedly said that their nuclear weapons are only to be used as retaliation against another country's first strike, i.e. purely a deterrent against nuclear first use.

Yang Chengjun, the ballistics expert in charge of the DF-41 project reaffirmed that commitment: "The DF-41 can cover any corner on the earth. Anyone who dares to launch a nuclear strike against us will face effective retaliation."

 

[war is best form of peace]

That's where you're wrong. Among the big powers, China is the only country to commit to a no-first-use (NFU) policy. The US has never committed to NFU, and the Russians ditched their NFU pledge in 1993 under Yeltsin.

China has repeatedly said that their nuclear weapons are only to be used as retaliation against another country's first strike, i.e. purely a deterrent against nuclear first use.

Yang Chengjun, the ballistics expert in charge of the DF-41 project reaffirmed that commitment: "The DF-41 can cover any corner on the earth. Anyone who dares to launch a nuclear strike against us will face effective retaliation."

Russian now says SARMAT got 36 warheads and can avoid interception in many ways. Range 17,000km can hit USA via Antarctica route.