• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Wuhan lab leak - entirely plausible

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
People do not understand the leak theory ... OR they are deliberately trying to not to understand for fear of implicating their beloved China and beloved CCCP.

Here's the run down for those idiots:

The lab leak theory DOES NOT say that Wuhan manufactured a new virus and leaked it to the world. That's absurd. A qualified immunologist or disease expert will tell you there are immense bio-technical hurdles that China cannot possibly have overcome, and ALSO that the structure of the Covid virus simply does not support such a theory. Any manufactured virus has tell-tale signs that Covid does not have, to put it simply.

The lab leak theory is that Wuhan was studying bat coronavirus - that is fact, NOT speculation, and somehow through carelessness or otherwise, some people there got infected and they went on to spread the disease. There is nothing implausible about this. This is entirely reasonable given that the institute was studying bat coronaviruses and had possibly thousands of samples on-site.

One broken test-tube or petri dish and a pandemic starts.

As simple as that.

Can the disease have jumped from an animal to a person? That's possible. But so is the lab leak theory which I now believe in.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Bodoh, assume bioweapon = instant death, like ebola.

It's not a leak (leak = 'honest mistake'), it's a deliberate release from a state-owned bioweapons program. You brought China into the WTO, let it earn a bit of money... guess where some of that money went to?

 

shockshiok

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/lab-leak-called-viable-possibility-for-covid-19-pandemic

Wuhan Lab Leak Called Viable Possible Cause for COVID-19 Pandemic​

May 21, 2021

Kevin Kavanagh, MD, a member of Infection Control Today®’s Editorial Advisory Board, says that “the assertion that the virus was purposefully released is probably not valid since the epicenter of the epidemic was in a highly populated portion of China and the country did not have a workable vaccine.”

After a lot of haggling, the Chinese government agreed to allow the WHO investigators to visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology, one of three laboratories in that city that study coronaviruses. Though the WHO investigators could visit the site, they were not allowed to conduct an investigation.

“Theories of accidental release from a lab and zoonotic spillover both remain viable,” the Science letter states. “Knowing how COVID-19 emerged is critical for informing global strategies to mitigate the risk of future outbreaks.”

The letter writers note that this dovetails with what Tedros Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director-general, said about the WHO report that the organization’s investigators released. That report calls the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a zoonotic spillover from an intermediate host as likely to very likely. A lab leak? The report called that “very unlikely.”

Ghebreyesus’s ambivalence about this conclusion seemed evident.

“Although the team [of WHO investigators] has concluded that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, this requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist experts, which I am ready to deploy,” Ghebreyesus said in a statement on March 30.

“There appears to be little doubt that, like the rest of the world, the Wuhan lab was experimenting on coronaviruses,” says Kavanagh. “On May 11 of this year Senator Rand Paul questioned the White House regarding 'gain of function' research, research which would be expected to make the viruses more dangerous and more transmissible. This research was also mentioned in a presidential Fact Sheet: Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from the Trump administration which apparently has not yet been refuted by the Biden administration.”

When the WHO report came out, Saskia v. Popescu, PHD, MPH, MA, CIC, another ICT® EAB member, agreed that more study needs to be done on the origin of COVID-19. She added, however, that “the truth is that the source of the pandemic does not change the poor response from so many countries, including the United States.”

The Science letter goes into a bit more detail as to why further research on the lab leak possibility needs to be examined. The letter notes that the two theories—lab leak and zoonotic spillover—“were not given balanced consideration. Only 4 of the 313 pages of the report and its annexes addressed the possibility of a laboratory accident.”

They continue: “We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data. A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven, inclusive of broad expertise, subject to independent oversight, and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest. Public health agencies and research laboratories alike need to open their records to the public. Investigators should document the veracity and provenance of data from which analyses are conducted and conclusions drawn, so that analyses are reproducible by independent experts.”

Spearheading the writing of the letter were Jesse Bloom, who studies the evolution of viruses at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and David Relman, a microbiologist at Stanford University.

They told the New York Times that the message can be boiled down to this: wait and see. “Most of the discussion you hear about SARS-CoV-2 origins at this point is coming from, I think, the relatively small number of people who feel very certain about their views,” Bloom told the newspaper. He added that anybody who’s making statements with a “high level of certainty is just outstripping what’s possible to do with the available evidence.”

Kavanagh says that “this subject of research in the Wuhan Lab has been almost taboo in the mainstream media. However, the construction of man-made (pseudo) virus is presently an exact science, with single amino acid substitutions possible. Similar to vaccine production, you just need to be able to input the genetic code you desire and a vaccine or pseudo-virus can be made.”

Kavanagh refers to what he describes as a “chilling article” by authors affiliated with China's National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC) and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals.

“This article describes a plethora of single amino acid substitutions in the spike protein from 106 pseudo-virus which resulted in ‘ten mutations such as N234Q, L452R, A475V, and V483A was markedly resistant to some mAbs’ and that ‘the dominant D614G itself and combined with other mutations are more infectious.’”

The D614G variant was the dominant variant in the United States in 2020.
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wuhan virus is like taliban engineered by US and perfected by China. Initially US and China come together to cook a virus from rémanents of SARS to counter Russia.

US China relationship go sour after and China perfected it. The one that spread isn’t the lab made version but variant after countless experiments done on animals and human. You reckon only squad 731 do human experiment ? There are a lot of death penalty prisoners and ughers in China too.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Does it really matter? More than one and half years have passed the world has already amassed sufficient data to show that the virus causes either no symptoms or mild symptoms in the vast majority of those who are infected.

The reaction to the pandemic has nothing to do with science. It's about attitude. In one camp are those who want to live risk free lives while keeping the risk of death to the barest minimum possible. These are the same ones that opt for stable jobs ie civil servants, bureaucrats and academics.

In the other camp are those who know that life needs to be lived despite the risks of death or failure. These are the small business owners and the free spirited who embrace the concept of personal responsibility.

Then there are the sheep caught in between who are governed by fear and will simply do as they are told.
 

LordElrond

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Indeed the virus as a bio- weapon has failed. A true bio-weapon would have wiped out the human race by now. So I’m pretty sure this virus is not released by aliens trying to take over earth.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
from msn.com:

China disease expert says COVID-19 origins probe should shift to U.S.- Global Times​


SHANGHAI (Reuters) -A senior Chinese epidemiologist said the United States should be the priority in the next phase of investigations into the origin of COVID-19 after a study showed the disease could have been circulating there as early as December 2019, state media said on Thursday.

The study, published this week by the U.S. National Institutes for Health (NIH), showed that at least seven people in five U.S. states were infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, weeks before the United States reported its first official cases.


A China-World Health Organization (WHO) joint study published in March said COVID-19 most likely originated in the country's wildlife trade, with the virus passing into humans from bats via an intermediary species.

But Beijing has promoted the theory that COVID-19 entered China from overseas via contaminated frozen food, while a number of foreign politicians are also calling for more investigations into the possibility it leaked from a laboratory.

Zeng Guang, chief epidemiologist with the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told state-owned tabloid the Global Times that attention should shift to the United States, which was slow to test people in the early stages of the outbreak, and is also the home of many biological laboratories.

"All bio-weapons related subjects that the country has should be subject to scrutiny," he was quoted as saying.

Commenting on the U.S. study on Wednesday, foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said it was now "obvious" the COVID-19 outbreak had "multiple origins" and that other countries should co-operate with the WHO.

The origin of the pandemic has become a source of political tension between China and the United States, with much of the recent focus on the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), located in Wuhan where the outbreak was first identified in late 2019.

China has been criticised for its lack of transparency when it comes to disclosing data about early cases as well as the viruses studied at WIV.

A report by a U.S. government national laboratory concluded that it was plausible that the virus had leaked from the Wuhan lab, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month.

A previous study has raised the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 could have been circulating in Europe as early as September, but experts said this didn't necessarily mean it did not originate in China, where many SARS-like coronaviruses have been found in the wild.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
furin cleavage site insertion in spike protein - although it can occur naturally, it’s sextremely rare considering the chain of coincidences for this to happen on a coronavirus that has very high transmissability and mutative properties.
 

CharKuayTeow

Alfrescian
Loyal
People do not understand the leak theory ... OR they are deliberately trying to not to understand for fear of implicating their beloved China and beloved CCCP.

Here's the run down for those idiots:

The lab leak theory DOES NOT say that Wuhan manufactured a new virus and leaked it to the world. That's absurd. A qualified immunologist or disease expert will tell you there are immense bio-technical hurdles that China cannot possibly have overcome, and ALSO that the structure of the Covid virus simply does not support such a theory. Any manufactured virus has tell-tale signs that Covid does not have, to put it simply.

The lab leak theory is that Wuhan was studying bat coronavirus - that is fact, NOT speculation, and somehow through carelessness or otherwise, some people there got infected and they went on to spread the disease. There is nothing implausible about this. This is entirely reasonable given that the institute was studying bat coronaviruses and had possibly thousands of samples on-site.

One broken test-tube or petri dish and a pandemic starts.

As simple as that.

Can the disease have jumped from an animal to a person? That's possible. But so is the lab leak theory which I now believe in.

The other thing to understand is that lab leaks happen frequently. There is a long history of accidental lab leaks of ebola, anthrax, and other organisms in the US, Europe, and elsewhere. It's not likely that China alone could avoid this, especially with the 差不多 attitudes there. Here's an article that talks about lab leaks: https://www.independentsciencenews....ory-releases-of-potential-pandemic-pathogens/
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
‘Obvious’ sign Covid ‘came from lab’

Sky News host Sharri Markson says Donald Trump made an…
The idea that the deadly Covid-19 pandemic originated in a Wuhan lab was once widely dismissed as little more than a fanciful conspiracy theory.

But today, a growing number of insiders and experts are convinced that’s exactly how it was unleashed on the globe – including former US President Donald Trump.

Speaking to Sky News journalist Sharri Markson for the bombshell documentary What Really Happened in Wuhan, Mr Trump shared clues he claimed showed it was “obvious” Covid had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“Some of the intelligence is classified … but commonsense tells you it most likely – and when I say most likely, like 95 per cent – came from the Wuhan lab,” he said.

“I don’t know if they had bad thoughts or whether it was gross incompetence, but one way or the other, it came out of Wuhan, and it came from the Wuhan lab.”

Mr Trump said one of the first clues of the looming disaster – and its links to the Wuhan lab – was after he “started hearing stories … that there were lots of body bags outside of the lab”.

“I heard that a long time ago and if they did in fact have body bags, that was one little indication, wasn’t it?”

Former US President Donald Trump says there’s evidence the virus was caused by a lab leak.
Former US President Donald Trump says there’s evidence the virus was caused by a lab leak.
It’s a view backed up by some of the most senior members of the Trump administration, including former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who told Markson there was “enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this”.

“The cumulative evidence that one can see points singularly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said.

“The most likely origin of Covid-19 was a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – it’s certainly a probability, and probably a certainty,” added John Ratcliffe, the administration’s former director of national intelligence.

He said if the virus had naturally jumped from bats to humans via the Wuhan wet market, which was the widely accepted theory, then it wouldn’t explain why the Chinese government acted the way it did in the weeks and months after the virus emerged.

Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA from 2017 to 2018 and US Secretary of State from 2018 to 2021, said there was ‘enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this’. Picture: Supplied
Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA from 2017 to 2018 and US Secretary of State from 2018 to 2021, said there was ‘enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this’. Picture: Supplied
“The Chinese communist party would not have shut down Wuhan. It would not have silenced doctors and scientists and journalists, and disappeared some of them,” he said, adding the intelligence community first became aware of the virus in late 2019.

Intelligence later revealed three scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been struck down with Covid-like symptoms in October 2019 – three months before the first case was officially reported in late December.

Mr Pompeo said based on all the evidence he had seen, it was the “first cluster” of Covid-19.

“I’ve seen no evidence there was a cluster that began any place but this,” he said.

David Asher, the US State Department’s former Covid-19 Investigator, agreed, and said he was shocked that the world “could have had foreknowledge – we could have known in November of 2019 that there was a disaster occurring inside Wuhan”.

“We could have reacted to it,” he said.

Sharri Markson, host of Sky News' What Really Happened In Wuhan documentary, during filming. Picture: Supplied
Sharri Markson, host of Sky News' What Really Happened In Wuhan documentary, during filming. Picture: Supplied
“The whole world could have been different … it would have been like stopping 9/11 before it happened.”

He said the intelligence failure occurred as government agencies were these days “drowning in data”, which meant information was not able to be processed in a timely fashion.

As for those three scientists who may have been the world’s first Covid-19 patients, their fate remains a mystery – as does the fate of Huang Yanling, a Wuhan Institute researcher whose existence was wiped from the lab’s website in early 2020 along with her personal social media presence, leading many to believe she had been infected with Covid before her disappearance.

So was the Covid fiasco an unlucky accident, or something more sinister?

According to Mr Trump at least, he “would like to think it wasn’t” developed as a bioweapon, and instead escaped through incompetence.

“So I think it was probably an accident, I don’t think it was on purpose, if it was, that’s essentially war,” Mr Trump said.
 

CharKuayTeow

Alfrescian
Loyal
‘Obvious’ sign Covid ‘came from lab’

Sky News host Sharri Markson says Donald Trump made an…
The idea that the deadly Covid-19 pandemic originated in a Wuhan lab was once widely dismissed as little more than a fanciful conspiracy theory.

But today, a growing number of insiders and experts are convinced that’s exactly how it was unleashed on the globe – including former US President Donald Trump.

Speaking to Sky News journalist Sharri Markson for the bombshell documentary What Really Happened in Wuhan, Mr Trump shared clues he claimed showed it was “obvious” Covid had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“Some of the intelligence is classified … but commonsense tells you it most likely – and when I say most likely, like 95 per cent – came from the Wuhan lab,” he said.

“I don’t know if they had bad thoughts or whether it was gross incompetence, but one way or the other, it came out of Wuhan, and it came from the Wuhan lab.”

Mr Trump said one of the first clues of the looming disaster – and its links to the Wuhan lab – was after he “started hearing stories … that there were lots of body bags outside of the lab”.

“I heard that a long time ago and if they did in fact have body bags, that was one little indication, wasn’t it?”

Former US President Donald Trump says there’s evidence the virus was caused by a lab leak.
Former US President Donald Trump says there’s evidence the virus was caused by a lab leak.
It’s a view backed up by some of the most senior members of the Trump administration, including former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who told Markson there was “enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this”.

“The cumulative evidence that one can see points singularly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said.

“The most likely origin of Covid-19 was a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology – it’s certainly a probability, and probably a certainty,” added John Ratcliffe, the administration’s former director of national intelligence.

He said if the virus had naturally jumped from bats to humans via the Wuhan wet market, which was the widely accepted theory, then it wouldn’t explain why the Chinese government acted the way it did in the weeks and months after the virus emerged.

Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA from 2017 to 2018 and US Secretary of State from 2018 to 2021, said there was ‘enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this’. Picture: Supplied
Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA from 2017 to 2018 and US Secretary of State from 2018 to 2021, said there was ‘enormous, albeit indirect, evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the centrepoint for this’. Picture: Supplied
“The Chinese communist party would not have shut down Wuhan. It would not have silenced doctors and scientists and journalists, and disappeared some of them,” he said, adding the intelligence community first became aware of the virus in late 2019.

Intelligence later revealed three scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been struck down with Covid-like symptoms in October 2019 – three months before the first case was officially reported in late December.

Mr Pompeo said based on all the evidence he had seen, it was the “first cluster” of Covid-19.

“I’ve seen no evidence there was a cluster that began any place but this,” he said.

David Asher, the US State Department’s former Covid-19 Investigator, agreed, and said he was shocked that the world “could have had foreknowledge – we could have known in November of 2019 that there was a disaster occurring inside Wuhan”.

“We could have reacted to it,” he said.

Sharri Markson, host of Sky News' What Really Happened In Wuhan documentary, during filming. Picture: Supplied
Sharri Markson, host of Sky News' What Really Happened In Wuhan documentary, during filming. Picture: Supplied
“The whole world could have been different … it would have been like stopping 9/11 before it happened.”

He said the intelligence failure occurred as government agencies were these days “drowning in data”, which meant information was not able to be processed in a timely fashion.

As for those three scientists who may have been the world’s first Covid-19 patients, their fate remains a mystery – as does the fate of Huang Yanling, a Wuhan Institute researcher whose existence was wiped from the lab’s website in early 2020 along with her personal social media presence, leading many to believe she had been infected with Covid before her disappearance.

So was the Covid fiasco an unlucky accident, or something more sinister?

According to Mr Trump at least, he “would like to think it wasn’t” developed as a bioweapon, and instead escaped through incompetence.

“So I think it was probably an accident, I don’t think it was on purpose, if it was, that’s essentially war,” Mr Trump said.

Trump and Sky News are trash. The lab leak theory is plausible, but you can't rely on anything that comes out of his mouth for anything. Better to find more reputable sources and people.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Wuhan lab leak is not plausible anymore because it's 100% fact. Only chicon plp deny it. Anyway good to see the ah neh variant return to chicon land. Return to sender
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Leaked document reveals China’s shock plan
‘Beyond doubt’ there was an ‘incident’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
Sky News host Sharri Markson says there is so much evidence…
Scientists planned to conduct risky, multimillion-dollar experiments involving bats and coronaviruses in China just 18 months before the lethal Covid-19 pandemic brought the world to its knees, leaked documents have revealed.

Do we need to investigate the origins of Covid further?
Yes, it's essential to know exactly what happened
No, containing the virus and saving lives is more important
Cast your vote
The documents were released by the Decentralised Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating Covid-19 (DRASTIC), a global online team of activists investigating the virus’s origins.

The group alleged the documents were leaked anonymously by a whistleblower, with the UK Telegraph claiming a former member of the Trump administration had confirmed the proposal was authentic.

The proposal

The papers show scientists from Wuhan and the US had planned to release coronavirus particles into Chinese bats in order to then vaccinate them against diseases which could be transmitted to humans, and had asked for $US14 million from the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to fund the project.

A health worker takes a swab sample to test for Covid-19 at a hospital in Wuhan. Picture: Hector Retamal/AFP
A health worker takes a swab sample to test for Covid-19 at a hospital in Wuhan. Picture: Hector Retamal/AFP
The 2018 proposal was to “synthesise spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease”.

Under the proposal, scientists wanted to genetically enhance airborne coronaviruses and release aerosols containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” among cave bats in Yunnan in China, as well as alter coronaviruses to more easily infect humans by introducing “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses.

The idea behind the research was to discover the risks posed by coronaviruses, as well as ways of preventing outbreaks and vaccinating bats against illnesses.

It was submitted by EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak, who later joined the World Health Organisation-led team which travelled to Wuhan to investigate Covid-19.

The leaked documents reveal the plan was rejected due to serious safety concerns.
The leaked documents reveal the plan was rejected due to serious safety concerns.
The leaked documents reveal the plan was rejected due to significant weaknesses in the proposal.
The leaked documents reveal the plan was rejected due to significant weaknesses in the proposal.
Risky plan rejected

However, DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office did not recommend it be funded at that time because significant weaknesses were identified.

Some of those weaknesses include the fact the proposal “does not mention or assess potential risks” of Gain of Function research or Dual Use Research of Concern issues, and “thus fails to present a DURC risk mitigation plan”.

“The proposal hardly addresses or discusses ethical, legal, and social issues,” the rejection continues.

“It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk.”

China’s top virologist, Shi Zhengli, known as ‘bat woman’, has been researching bat viruses for decades in Wuhan. Picture: Johannes Eisele/AFP
China’s top virologist, Shi Zhengli, known as ‘bat woman’, has been researching bat viruses for decades in Wuhan. Picture: Johannes Eisele/AFP
According to DRASTIC, the documents show the plan was a joint project by US-based EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

DRASTIC states these bodies “attempted to carry out advanced and dangerous human pathogenicity bat coronavirus research that would clearly qualify as Gain of Function in a grant proposal submitted to the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018”.

Gain of Function (GoF) research is a controversial technique used by scientists to alter the function of a virus, in order to better understand its evolution – although many believe the practice is too risky to be justified.

“Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and ‘batified’ mice,” DRASTIC states.

“The EHA/WIV proposal (named ‘DEFUSE’) was ultimately rejected for full funding (but leaving open the door for partial funding), in part because it misinterpreted the GoF (Gain of Function) guidelines.

China's Coverup

Nov 17, 2019
China’s first case of COVID-19 is reported, according to government data that describes him as a 55-year-old man from Hubei. This data is not released until March after authorities identified at least 266 people with the virus.

“In other words, a branch of the federal government had already judged aspects of EHA’s research, and the corresponding shared research plan with the WIV, as falling under the definition of GoF … These grant proposal documents also show a staggering level of deep involvement of EHA with the WIV, on matters of national interest … All the while without proper risk assessment and considerations for ethical and social issues and incorrect evaluation of what constitutes GoF research.”

Questions raised

Despite DARPA’s rejection of the plan, DRASTIC has questioned whether the research may have still happened, in light of the popular theory – supported by former US President Donald Trump himself – that Covid-19 took hold via a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“Given that we find in this proposal a discussion of the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites, a review by the wider scientific community of the plausibility of artificial insertion is warranted,” DRASTIC said.

In this photo taken on February 3, 2021, Peter Daszak (R), Thea Fischer (L) and other members of the World Health Organisation team investigating the origins of Covid-19 arrive at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Picture: Hector Retamal/AFP
In this photo taken on February 3, 2021, Peter Daszak (R), Thea Fischer (L) and other members of the World Health Organisation team investigating the origins of Covid-19 arrive at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Picture: Hector Retamal/AFP
Unearthed footage

Meanwhile, recently unearthed footage of a 2017 conference shows Dr Daszak spoke about how his “work on coronaviruses in China” was conducted with “funding through” White House Chief Medical Adviser Dr Anthony Fauci’s National Institutes of Health agency.

According to the National Pulse, Dr Daszak discussed the funding in his speech.

“Working with the USAID EPT PREDICT Program and funding through NIAID to work on coronaviruses in China, we were able to test out this idea of predicting what the next emerging diseases might be. So we’ve all heard of SARS. We know that SARS is carried by civets. Well, actually, the host of SARS-like viruses, the viruses that the SARS coronavirus emerged from are bats,” he reportedly said during the presentation.

Read related topics:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal

Secret dossier‘s bombshell Covid theory​

  • e061f8a1f72b64a690c59f621ac96a55
Whistleblowers, Chen Qiushi, Li Zehua, and Fang Bin vanished…
In January 2020, when news of a mystery new virus in China was only just starting to spread, Miles Yu noticed a telling detail which immediately set off alarm bells.
As a result, Chinese-born Mr Yu, who was then serving as Principal China Adviser to the US State Department, began investigating the new coronavirus around the clock.
At that stage, the Chinese Communist Party was yet to properly acknowledge the illness, so Mr Yu relied on news reports and Chinese social media chatter to gather information – but soon noticed something truly bizarre.
While a Chinese news report had mentioned every institute and hospital involved in the handling of the virus, strangely, there had been no mention of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
That sparked a frenzied investigation which features in a new book by Sky’s Sharri Markson, What Really Happened in Wuhan,which uncovers a string of explosive details of the extent of Beijing’s Covid cover up.
Mr Yu began meticulously recording details from the Institute’s own website regarding its coronavirus research projects, staff lists and announcements.
Miles Yu’s explosive dossier raised bombshell possibilities. Picture: Hector Retamal /AFP
Miles Yu’s explosive dossier raised bombshell possibilities. Picture: Hector Retamal /AFP
“Yu realised the gravity of what he was reading – the world’s premiere coronavirus laboratory was in the same city as the outbreak of a novel coronavirus – and he knew instinctively what it could mean,” Markson writes.
“The very city where the outbreak began is home to a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) virology laboratory genetically manipulating coronaviruses in a dangerous way.”
Over the course of his research, he discovered the Wuhan Institute of Virology was just one of two BSL-4 labs in the whole of China, and an “alarmed” Mr Yu began saving the most important pages from the website for his records.
But when he returned just a few weeks later, the links had mysteriously vanished.
That spurred Mr Yu to compile an official report on his findings, including the discovery of a collection of virus-carrying bats by Chinese scientists in Wuhan.

China's Coverup​

timeline0_BODAqWBVo0.jpg

Nov 17, 2019
China’s first case of COVID-19 is reported, according to government data that describes him as a 55-year-old man from Hubei. This data is not released until March after authorities identified at least 266 people with the virus.
Mr Yu also investigated Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist Shi Zhengli, known as “bat woman”, and another coronavirus facility near the wet market first linked to the outbreak.
He became increasingly convinced of a possible link between the Institute and the pandemic, and was tasked with compiling a document with information on whether there were grounds to launch further investigations.
“This was a time when everyone was busy responding to the Covid outbreak,” Mr Yu tells Markson.
“Very few people were looking at the reason for the outbreak, let alone to establish the culpability of CCP on this.
“I knew we had to find out the origin of this, we had to find out who is responsible for the spread of the virus. The overarching point was, we have to find out if China is responsible enough to keep bio-research safe.”
By April 2020, he had completed a “long list of strong circumstantial evidence” against the lab, including its “substandard and negligent biosafety practices” – and in doing so, he became the first individual within the US government to sound the alarm.
Mr Yu’s bombshell dossier, titled The PRC’s Biosafety Negligence and Circumstantial Evidence Against the Wuhan Institute of Virology, included many hundreds of pages of troubling information, and concludes the virus likely originated in a Wuhan lab, although he admits there is no “smoking gun evidence” to prove it completely.
Sharri Markson's new book, What Really Happened in Wuhan<i>,</i> has revealed a string of Covid cover ups. Pictures: Supplied
Sharri Markson's new book, What Really Happened in Wuhan,has revealed a string of Covid cover ups. Pictures: Supplied
“China is a country obsessed with dangerous viruses,” the report begins.
“State-run media outlets often tout China’s great discoveries of a phenomenal number of new viruses heretofore unknown to mankind.
“Over the past 12 years, China’s army of virologists have discovered close to 2000 new viruses while over the past 200 years, the rest of the world has only discovered 2284.
“In its rush to greatness and dominance in virus studies, China often neglects biosafety, with catastrophic consequences.”
But perhaps most startling of all was a theory outlined by Mr Yu in the report, which “raised the bombshell possibility that China may have invented a Covid-19 vaccine prior to the outbreak”.
Mr Yu explains that in mid-January 2020, Dr Antony Fauci donated Remdesivir samples to China as the outbreak worsened, in a bid to see if the drug helped save lives.
But just days later – before Beijing even confirmed Covid-19 was transmissible – the Wuhan Institute of Virology compiled a “user patent” application for the American drug, which Markson describes as “intellectual property theft”.
According to Mr Yu, this “may give credence to the following possibility: prior to the surprise outbreak in its close proximity, WIV (the Wuhan Institute of Virology) had possessed the novel coronavirus in its lab and had known of its lethality and pathogenicity for a while. It had been actively researching a vaccine before anyone else could succeed, thus giving China the sole patent right”.
Miles Yu claims the Chinese government displayed “bizarre behaviour”. Picture: Greg Baker/AFP
Miles Yu claims the Chinese government displayed “bizarre behaviour”. Picture: Greg Baker/AFP

Do we need to investigate the origins of Covid further?​

Yes, it's essential to know exactly what happened
No, containing the virus and saving lives is more important
Cast your vote
Mr Yu argues it indicated China may have wanted to prevent Remdesivir from entering the Chinese market, as filing a patent usually takes months “or even years” to complete.
Other disturbing elements of the dossier include China’s bioweapons research, claims from scientists that Covid-19 was genetically engineered, evidence of Shi Zhengli’s role in genetically manipulating viruses and concerns from a lab insider about the Institute’s biosafety record.
Speaking to Markson, Mr Yu said the report also revealed “really bizarre Chinese government behaviour manifested directly form the very top of the Chinese public health authorities to the Wuhan Institute of Virology leadership team”.
“The entire Chinese government system, including all agencies of public security, public health, state media and science research institutions, all acted as if they were hiding something big and became absolutely kneejerk about any mention of possible lab leaks”.
And yet, for months on end, the possibility of a lab leak was dismissed as a wild conspiracy theory at every turn.
 
Top