• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WTF...SIA is not included?

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
18,227
Points
113
10 safest airlines unveiled
GENEVA: Air France-KLM, British Airways and Lufthansa are the safest airlines in Europe, according to a study ranking the "10 safest airlines" by the Air Transport Rating Agency (ATRA) released Monday.


The safest US-based airlines are AMR Corporation, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines and US Airways, while the safest from Asia is Japan Airlines, it said, without giving a ranking within the top 10.

To obtain this classification, the first of its kind, ATRA examined publicly available information on 15 criteria, such as the average age of the aircraft used or the homogeneity of the fleet, it said.

The agency explained that to understand airline safety, one needed not only to look at accident figures, but also "technical, human, organisational and external" elements.

"Even though the European Union publishes a 'blacklist' of dangerous airlines, there exists a real difference in safety between the other airline companies," ATRA added.
 
Trying to take off from a closed runway is not a good look on an airline's CV.
 
Trying to take off from a closed runway is not a good look on an airline's CV.

neither is Air France,..that crashed off coast of Brazil, reasons unknown.

not to mention the crash that ended the services of Concorde.

Japan Air maybe i agree...
 
I must take a dig at my GF, LOL
 
Last edited:
The Govt always trumpet our global competitiveness using Beri's ranking. Its easy to kelong them with so many around. SIA better buy a subscription with ATRA. Ask the Japs, they perceived JAL to be an unsafe airline compared to ANA. Flown on ANA its easy to see why, everything by the book. Trundled to the extreme end of the runway for take-off, flew the widest arc my GPS ever captured for landing. Btw, would you step into a brand new plane by Garuda over SQ?
 
Maybe this is the reason why, from the 1st sentence.

GENEVA: Air France-KLM, British Airways and Lufthansa are the safest airlines in Europe, according to a study ranking the "10 safest airlines" by the Air Transport Rating Agency (ATRA) released Monday.
 
Last edited:
Maybe this is the reason why, from the 1st sentence.

http://www.atra.aero/News/HOLISTIC_SAFETY_RATING_2011/5/

Please lah SIA is not in the top 10 in the WORLD.

The top ten airlines 2011 (2009 data) from the holistic safety profiles are (by alphabetic order):
Air France-KLM
AMR Corporation (American Airlines, American Eagles)
British Airways
Continental Airlines
Delta Airlines
Japan Airlines
Lufthansa
Southwest Airlines
United Airlines
US Airways
 
here's another take on the subject:

While European and American airlines rarely feature in the top 10 rankings for best customer service, airlines from these regions have dominated a new list of the world's safest carriers.
A report by the Air Transport Rating Agency (ATRA) found that the safest carriers in the world were mainly those based in Europe and the United States.
No Australian or New Zealand airlines featured in the top 10.
Air France-KLM, British Airways and Lufthansa are the safest airlines in Europe.
The safest US-based airlines are AMR Corporation, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines and US Airways, while the safest from Asia is Japan Airlines, it said, without giving a ranking within the top ten.
To obtain this classification, the first of its kind, ATRA examined publicly available information on criteria such as the average age of the aircraft used or the homogeneity of the fleet, it said.
The agency explained that to understand airline safety, one needed not only to look at accident figures, but also "technical, human, organisational and external" elements.
"Even though the European Union publishes a 'blacklist' of dangerous airlines, there exists a real difference in safety between the other airline companies," ATRA added.
The agency believed the EU's list was a good start on rating airline safety, but said the list led to the belief that all airlines not on the 'blacklist' offered the same level of safety, which was not the case.
According to its website, the Geneva-based agency says it is independent of all "airlines, manufacturers, regulatory authorities, trade unions and not-for-profit organisations" in performing its aviation risk assessment.
The top 10 list is in contrast to the annual Skytrax survey that ranks airlines based on customer service. None of the airlines in the Skytrax top 10 made the ATRA's top 10 safety list.
World's 10 safest airlines (in alphabetical order)
Air France-KLM
AMR Corporation (American Airlines, American Eagles)
British Airways
Continental Airlines
Delta Airlines
Japan Airlines
Lufthansa
Southwest Airlines
United Airlines
US Airways
 
I have not flown SIA ever since they continued to fly when Qantas grounded their A380s.

In the end Qantas was proven right and SIA looked like they gambled with the engines.

No SIA for me anymore. My life is too precious for me while its just another statistics for them.
 
<img src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_Airlines_Flight_006" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://www.zaobao.com/special/sia/images/crash031100b.jpg" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://www.airlinesafety.com/editorials/Pics/Singapore006.jpeg" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1000000/images/_1004739_planeap300.jpg" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/news_images/20001104/singair.jpg" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b5/SQ006_casualty_being_carried_away.jpg" width="500" height="200">
<img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6YKiFXZzIBs/TNDSqo-LuvI/AAAAAAAABW4/8k2vP4syNUE/s1600/SQ1.jpg" width="500" height="200">

<iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bW3f0ZE4je8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JfrVdrgMMXo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Singapore Airlines Flight 006
Sabo by Taiwan twice in 2 decades .

By 8 November 2000, several bodies were scheduled to be repatriated. Of the bodies:[58]

19, including 14 Americans, 3 Taiwanese, and 2 Indians, were repatriated to the United States
13, including 11 Singaporeans, 1 British, and 1 American, were repatriated to Singapore
10, including 8 Indians and 2 Americans, were repatriated to India
4 were repatriated to Malaysia [59]
3 Americans were repatriated to Canada
1 was repatriated to Indonesia [59]
1 was repatriated to Japan [59]
1 was repatriated to the Netherlands [59]
1 was repatriated to the United Kingdom
1 was repatriated to Vietnam [59]​


<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/36/SQ006_Coffins_of_deceased.jpg" width="500" height="200">​
 
Last edited:
Not one mention of this survey in the Shitty Times or MediaCock.
You can bet your ass that if SQ made it into the survey, they would be giving it FRONT PAGE coverage.
 
Back
Top