WTF do WP want?

[aerobwala]

.....

(2) The Terms of Reference should extend to examining whether any past payments made by the Town Council were improper and should therefore be recovered, and should not be limited to only transactions involving FMSS and FMSI.

Continue digging, AGO, PwC, and now court appointed accountants, the most audited accounts in Singapore ?

 

[hsienloong]

(2) The Terms of Reference should extend to examining whether any past payments made by the Town Council were improper and should therefore be recovered, and should not be limited to only transactions involving FMSS and FMSI.
Continue digging, AGO, PwC, and now court appointed accountants, the most audited accounts in Singapore ?

Yes, the more the White DEVIL digs, the more White Shit from the PAST shall also surfaces to haunt the DEVIL. It's called SELF-PWNED.
Since we are at the topic of "any past payments made by the Town Council were improper and should therefore be recovered",
let's look at the LEHMAN BROTHERHOOD of Minibond Notes, DBS High Notes 5 and Merrill Lynch's Jubilee Series 3 Notes.

1. Holland-Bukit Panjang Town Council lost S$8 million of tax payers' money in reckless gambling. Instead of censuring, discipling, and or removing MP Teo Ho Pin, the chairman of the Holland-Bukit Panjang TC and Coordinating Chairman of PAP Town Councils,
the White DEVIL prefers to retain him at the expense of tax payers' money.

2. Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Councils lost S$4 million tax payers' money in reckless gambling. Instead of censuring, discipling, and or removing MP DPM Teo Chee Hean, he is still in office enjoying the huge pay package at the tax payers' expense.

So where were the AGO and MND in this fiasco?

 

[zeroo]

When PAP make mistakes, they report and debate in Parliament then take active steps to resolve them.

When WP make mistakes, they claim they no need to answer to parliament and fight the govt in court when the govt is trying to help them clear the issue.

 

[hsienloong]

When PAP make mistakes, they report and debate in Parliament then take active steps to resolve them. When WP make mistakes, they claim they no need to answer to parliament and fight the govt in court when the govt is trying to help them clear the issue.

Come on, are you still living in a cave or are you totally brainwashed? PAP seldom claim they make a mistake unless they are caught with their pants down. Like the AIM Saga and or the Lehman Brothers Fiasco. Wake Up!

 

[winnipegjets]

When PAP make mistakes, they report and debate in Parliament then take active steps to resolve them.

PAP makes an empty statement and you keep singing it. Look at the facts lah. Temasek mismanaged our investment, losing billions ...got report? got debate? got resolve?
AIM scandal ...who report? Not PAP. What debate? Reading prepared texts. What actions? White-wash exercise carried out by well-paid scholar civil servants. Why never call in PWC? More money involved. The loss continues till today.

 

[winnipegjets]

With a cursory glance at your first statement, I can conclude that you are trying to mislead readers into believing that the Court has found AHTC guilty of suppressing facts. NO! That not true.
This is just the preliminary steps to define the scope of work. As I have mentioned before, WP is trying hard to save COST.
WP has defined the scope of work based on interpretations originally from the AGO Report.
However, PAP (HBD/MND) felt that it was not enough, that's why AHTC have to seek the Court to come out with a final definition of the Scope of Work.
Simple as that. It like you go to a restaurant and ordered an a la carte meal based on budget that is enough to sate your apetite,
but the restaurant manager insist that you should include more items from the menu to have a wholesome meal,
which is beyond your means so a fight ensued and both of you landed in Court to have the Judge decide on what you should eat.

So don't get too excited yet and start "cumming" all over the forum even before the jugdement is out. You should seek mental help for your constant Premature Conjecture.

WP should play this attack on them up. Kick up a big fuss. It is time the WP learn showmanship.

To have a third-party control the finances of the WP TC is an attack on role of MP as the leader of the Town Council. The MP is elected and that the WP MPs continue to hold office show that the people have confidence in the MPs and rejected the PAP-trumped up charges.
The PAP is usurping the WP MPs their legislated role by appointing a third-party to control the finance.

If this is allowed, then we should also allow that the finances of the our government be controlled by a third party. Or that Temasek and GIC be placed under the control of a third party.

The PAP is playing with fire. You can't have it both ways. If this third party control on TC finances is permitted, then the same rule should apply to the government, Temasek, GIC, CPF etc. The elected officials can be overruled.