WP should go to court to sort out Charles Chong's claim of 1 Million surplus !

Tiu-leh-see-fart

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
661
Points
18
This is a very complicated case.

When PE handed over to WP, they said there was one million surplus for Punggol east but later said the surplus was belonged to the Bigger GRC . You see this is most messy part. WP found a deficit when the accounts was handed over from PAP. The statement was signed by PAP people . The operating funds were indeed in deficit !

If the claim of 1 million surplus was true for the larger GRC when Punggol east belonged to, then the operating funds for PE should see a profit of $ 166,666 approx at pro-rated share, after factoring 6 wards.

WP should act legally if PAP refuses to clarify the surplus of one million whether it belonged to punggol east or to the larger GRC where punggol east belonged to at that time.

This is a serious matter because WP has to hand over the correct accounts to the Punggol SMC. PE now under the PAP will dispute the accounts and in turn asking for the 1 million surplus which does not exist.

Voters of Punggol east need to know the truth so that there is no misunderstanding between WP and the PE voters.

It is best to have everything comes clean and issue correction if there is ! PAP has to gentlemanly issue a definitive clarification whether there is a surplus or a deficit . The answer is that simple.
 
Last edited:
Yes, amicable way to solve this issue.

if there is no such surplus, the current MP for PE should apologise to WP and the PE voters.

if there is a surplus, PAP must find this money and correct the accounts and apologise to WP and the voters.

I think this is something to do with integrity, all parties must come clean on this 1 million surplus.

Mass media also cannot hide this truth because it affects the future of Singapore and singaporeans, all voters need to know this truth.

clarifying this statement is good for Singapore and singaporeans.

WP must not hand the accounts to the PE SMC unless the statement is rightly clarified. WP has the right to do so.
 
First , to clarify the surplus of 1 million --whether it was belonged to the larger GRC or PETC , or whether was there any surplus at all ?

second, where did Charles Chong get the idea the 22 million sinking fund handed over the WP is not accounted for ?

If there is no evidence to prove the allegations are true, and if all these statements are just lies , there should be a public apology and PE should go to the polls ---a by- election.

If WP finds it is necessary to further clarify the matter, and if WP stand is good and stead, its better to carry out the action.
Or else, by 2020, WP would be no more !
 
First , to clarify the surplus of 1 million --whether it was belonged to the larger GRC or PETC , or whether was there any surplus at all ?

second, where did Charles Chong get the idea the 22 million sinking fund handed over the WP is not accounted for ?

If there is no evidence to prove the allegations are true, and if all these statements are just lies , there should be a public apology and PE should go to the polls ---a by- election.

If WP finds it is necessary to further clarify the matter, and if WP stand is good and stead, its better to carry out the action.
Or else, by 2020, WP would be no more !

Sue that burglar and to reject GE result, call for BE
Then I will respect you, I dun think LTK got the balls !
 
LTK,
Please show us you got ball and late JBJ will be proud of you.
 

Attachments

  • ball.jpg
    ball.jpg
    64.5 KB · Views: 374
If WP finds it is necessary to further clarify the matter, and if WP stand is good and stead, its better to carry out the action.
casino royal
 
Back
Top