-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
World Legacy { Cruise Ship } By World Cruises : Starting 18 December 2025
- Thread starter HorLee
- Start date
SINGAPORE - A passenger on board a ship where a fire broke out early on Feb 20, killing a crew member, has described the incident as "a truly terrible and traumatising experience".
The World Legacy cruise ship, which had 271 passengers - including 139 Singaporeans - and 388 crew members on board, was en route to Singapore when a fire broke out in the lounge area on deck nine at about 4am.
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) said an Indonesian crew member died.
He was a 23-year-old laundry attendant aboard the ship, said the Indonesian Embassy in Singapore in a statement on Feb 21.
Identified only by his initials PL, he was found collapsed in the lobby of deck nine by firefighters, the embassy said in response to queries by The Straits Times.
Despite medical assistance, the crew member was pronounced dead at 4.30am with the cause of death determined as cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to asphyxiation.
The embassy said it is working with the Singapore authorities and the ship's agent to expedite Mr PL's repatriation to Indonesia, as well as to ensure his next of kin receive his financial entitlement.
All necessary procedures are conducted with due consideration for his family's best interests, it added.
MPA said that all passengers were safely evacuated, and four people were taken to hospital.The fire was extinguished by the Singapore Civil Defence Force's (SCDF) marine firefighters.
The cause of the fire is under investigation.
"Everyone panicked'
The passenger, who gave her name as Quynh, said they were asked to stop all activities at about 4.20am.
"Everyone panicked," she told The Straits Times. "That's when the loudspeaker announced the fire and asked everyone to move to deck seven."
She added that when asked, crew members told them not to worry and that everything was fine.
However, the 31-year-old said she noticed smoke starting to spread down to deck three.
"When we reached deck seven, there were crew (members) standing at the door, asking everyone to put on life vests and move to the outside deck," she said.
With smoke filling the deck, she told ST that she and her companions - her husband and their friends - became scared and started considering the worst-case scenario.
The Police Coast Guard arrived at about 5am and the SCDF maritime firefighting and rescue crew at about 6am.
"It wasn't until 7.10am that we were told to move down to deck three to wait for the rescue boat," she said.
"And there, we had to jostle and wait from around 7.20am to 9.20am before we could board the rescue boat."
A video Ms Quynh shared on Tiktok shows passengers wearing life vests gathered on one of the decks.The video later pans to show people moving to an upper deck.
According to Ms Quynh, the passengers were standing from about 4.20am to about 9.20am.
"Four hours of cold, wet, exhaustion and fatigue," she said. "Some (people) also suffered from smoke and difficulty breathing."
She added that she and one of her friends experienced headaches, giddiness and sore throats after breathing in smoke.
"It was a truly terrible and traumatising experience," she said.
MPA said that the vessel is anchored at Raffles Reserved Anchorage.
Sister Sally why she posted so many
on this thread ?
Fatty asked you ?
This picture more power
What is the latest move by WL ? Never give up continue running or dissappear from sg?Sister Sally why she posted so many
on this thread ?
Fatty asked you ?
This picture more power
View attachment 237150
Sister Sally why she posted so many
on this thread ?
Fatty asked you ?
This picture more power
View attachment 237150
Last edited:
this morning AP is berthed at HFC.
WL is berth at Sembawang Port.
Fatty is laughing to the Banks
It is absolutely possible for passengers of the MV World Legacy incident on February 20, 2026, to file legal claims.
In a situation involving 100+ passengers, this usually takes the form of a Collective Claim (often called a "representative action" in Singapore law) where a group of people with the same interest sues the responsible parties together.
Here is what that legal action is "all about" and how it targets each party:
1. The Grounds for the Claim: "Duty of Care"
Under maritime and consumer law, the owners and operators owe you a "duty of care" to provide a safe environment. A legal claim would center on Negligence. The group would likely argue that:
* Maintenance Failure: Reports of power outages and technical issues since the December launch suggest the ship was not "seaworthy."
* System Failure: If the fire detection or suppression systems on Deck 9 failed to activate promptly, the operator is liable.
* Inadequate Training: If the evacuation of the 271 passengers was chaotic or if crew responses contributed to injuries, the operators are responsible.
2. Who is Sued and Why?
A lawsuit would likely name several defendants to ensure there is "deep pocket" insurance to pay the victims:
* World Cruises (Operator) & Dragon Cruises Pte Ltd: They are the primary contact point for your ticket. They are responsible for the day-to-day safety and management of the vessel.
* Venture Ship Management Europe (Technical Manager): As the party responsible for the ship's mechanical upkeep, they would be sued if the fire was caused by faulty wiring or poor maintenance.
* The Ship Owner (Vessel Holding Company): Often a separate legal entity, but liable under "in rem" (against the ship) maritime laws.
* The Captain (Master): While captains are rarely sued for money (as they don't have the insurance the company has), they can be named in a suit to compel testimony or if there was "gross negligence" or "reckless conduct" in their command during the fire.
3. What can Passengers Claim For?
A collective claim isn't just about the ticket price (which the company has already offered to refund). It’s about:
* Personal Injury: Medical bills for the four passengers hospitalized and any long-term respiratory issues from smoke inhalation.
* Psychological Trauma: Compensation for the distress and PTSD of being evacuated at 4:00 AM from a burning ship.
* Loss of Property: Compensation for luggage, electronics, or valuables damaged by fire, smoke, or water during the SCDF firefighting efforts.
* Consequential Losses: If the incident caused you to miss work or other expensive travel connections.
4. Why a "Representative Action"?
Instead of 100 people hiring 100 different lawyers, one or two lead passengers can represent the entire group. This is more powerful because:
* Lower Cost: Legal fees are shared across the group.
* Pressure: It is much harder for The American Club (the ship's insurer) to ignore a massive group of 100+ people than a single individual.
* Consistency: It ensures everyone gets a fair settlement rather than some getting more than others.
Important Reality Check
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and SCDF are still investigating the cause.
Most lawyers will wait for the official investigation report to be released.
If that report finds the ship was at fault, a legal claim becomes much easier to win.
In a situation involving 100+ passengers, this usually takes the form of a Collective Claim (often called a "representative action" in Singapore law) where a group of people with the same interest sues the responsible parties together.
Here is what that legal action is "all about" and how it targets each party:
1. The Grounds for the Claim: "Duty of Care"
Under maritime and consumer law, the owners and operators owe you a "duty of care" to provide a safe environment. A legal claim would center on Negligence. The group would likely argue that:
* Maintenance Failure: Reports of power outages and technical issues since the December launch suggest the ship was not "seaworthy."
* System Failure: If the fire detection or suppression systems on Deck 9 failed to activate promptly, the operator is liable.
* Inadequate Training: If the evacuation of the 271 passengers was chaotic or if crew responses contributed to injuries, the operators are responsible.
2. Who is Sued and Why?
A lawsuit would likely name several defendants to ensure there is "deep pocket" insurance to pay the victims:
* World Cruises (Operator) & Dragon Cruises Pte Ltd: They are the primary contact point for your ticket. They are responsible for the day-to-day safety and management of the vessel.
* Venture Ship Management Europe (Technical Manager): As the party responsible for the ship's mechanical upkeep, they would be sued if the fire was caused by faulty wiring or poor maintenance.
* The Ship Owner (Vessel Holding Company): Often a separate legal entity, but liable under "in rem" (against the ship) maritime laws.
* The Captain (Master): While captains are rarely sued for money (as they don't have the insurance the company has), they can be named in a suit to compel testimony or if there was "gross negligence" or "reckless conduct" in their command during the fire.
3. What can Passengers Claim For?
A collective claim isn't just about the ticket price (which the company has already offered to refund). It’s about:
* Personal Injury: Medical bills for the four passengers hospitalized and any long-term respiratory issues from smoke inhalation.
* Psychological Trauma: Compensation for the distress and PTSD of being evacuated at 4:00 AM from a burning ship.
* Loss of Property: Compensation for luggage, electronics, or valuables damaged by fire, smoke, or water during the SCDF firefighting efforts.
* Consequential Losses: If the incident caused you to miss work or other expensive travel connections.
4. Why a "Representative Action"?
Instead of 100 people hiring 100 different lawyers, one or two lead passengers can represent the entire group. This is more powerful because:
* Lower Cost: Legal fees are shared across the group.
* Pressure: It is much harder for The American Club (the ship's insurer) to ignore a massive group of 100+ people than a single individual.
* Consistency: It ensures everyone gets a fair settlement rather than some getting more than others.
Important Reality Check
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and SCDF are still investigating the cause.
Most lawyers will wait for the official investigation report to be released.
If that report finds the ship was at fault, a legal claim becomes much easier to win.
Similar threads
