LV, Prada and Chanel, women loves to flaunt their handbags, it defines their status and taste. So men status are based on the watches they wear?
No amount of handbags or watches is going to re-define you.
LV, Prada and Chanel, women loves to flaunt their handbags, it defines their status and taste. So men status are based on the watches they wear?
When you look at a man, you look at his pen.
When you look at a man, you look at his pen.
So men status are based on the watches they wear?
As far as I can see, the majority of whores have LV and Prada bags so where is the status?
Same goes with Rolex watches especially the solid gold variety. I'd be ashamed to wear one. The association is hardly flattering.
If u cant afford one, admit it. Dont have to go all green eyes over have & have not.
If u cant afford one, admit it. Dont have to go all green eyes over have & have not.
I personally encountered Chinese PRC who drank expensive corked wine and commented that he liked the taste of grapes.
Yes, he wore a genuine Rolex.
Affordability is not the issue. It's brand association.
LV, Prada and Chanel, women loves to flaunt their handbags, it defines their status and taste. So men status are based on the watches they wear?