Woffles Wu case hits a nerve

[Confuseous]

Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

There are so many inconsistencies in this abetment case that I don't know if I want to laugh or cry. Or stamp my feet and shout, "I don't know what to say!"

What do you think?

Woffles Wu admitted to the press that, "I was fined for providing the name of someone who was not driving the car" [Link] and the AG Chambers respond with:

2. Woffles Wu was charged for abetting his employee Kuan to give false information to the police about the commission of speeding offenses in 2005 and 2006. Kuan gave the false information. Woffles Wu, who did not give any information to the police, was charged with abetting Kuan to do so, which is an offence under Section 81(3) of the Road Traffic Act. There was no evidence of payment or gratification given to Kuan. Kuan, who is 82 years old, was given a stern warning.

3. In general, fines or short custodial sentences are imposed for wilfully providing false information, under Section 81(3) Road Traffic Act. Custodial sentences are typically imposed under this section when there are aggravating features, such as many instances of the offence committed by the same person. [Link]

My simple-coffee-shop-uncle logic is:

- http://feedmetothefish.blogspot.sg/

 

[TemasekIsSickening]

Don't Be Baffled By The Case Involving Woffle

It took the Police a total of six years.

To bring to Court a simple straightforward case

Involving a famous surgeon by name of Woffle

Many of us are rightfully baffled

Despite the explanation by legal eagle Shanmugam

Who represent our accountable Government

A big fight and a small scuffle

Does not always become a legal tussle

Those with money has the muscle

The weak are dry leaves that only rustle.

Welcome to a 1st World Nation

Where everything is in automation

 

[Confuseous]

Until now no one got the name of the judge?

Yes, Bro, I have found this a very interesting case because unlike all other cases of this nature, not only were the drivers not named,

- the make of the car
- the name of the judge
- and why was the case not brought up only when investigations were complete; instead we have Home Minister saying that investigations are still ongoing as to who the driver was. Surely this is not very fair, regardless of whether it involved Woffles, Wuffles, or Waffles.

I await the written judgement with abated breath.

 

[Jumong]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

Woffles Wu admitted to the press that, "I was fined for providing the name of someone who was not driving the car" [Link] and the AG Chambers respond with:

2. Woffles Wu was charged for abetting his employee Kuan to give false information to the police about the commission of speeding offenses in 2005 and 2006. Kuan gave the false information. Woffles Wu, who did not give any information to the police, was charged with abetting Kuan to do so, which is an offence under Section 81(3) of the Road Traffic Act. There was no evidence of payment or gratification given to Kuan. Kuan, who is 82 years old, was given a stern warning.

3. In general, fines or short custodial sentences are imposed for wilfully providing false information, under Section 81(3) Road Traffic Act. Custodial sentences are typically imposed under this section when there are aggravating features, such as many instances of the offence committed by the same person. [Link]

Correct me if I'm wrong. Woffles Wu would still have been charged under section 81(3) if the AGC had deemed that Woffles didn't just abet but wilfully provided false information to the police. In essence, abetting or otherwise, Woffles would still escape with $1,000 fine.

 

[wendychan]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

"buat bodoh" is a very STELLAR trait

 

[Jumong]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

This report named the counsel acting for Woffles Wu - Senior Counsel Harry Elias.

http://everythingalsocomplain.com/2012/06/13/woffles-wu-lying-to-the-police/

Still hunting for the name of the judge.

 

[wendychan]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

This report named the counsel acting for Woffles Wu - Senior Counsel Harry Elias.

http://everythingalsocomplain.com/2012/06/13/woffles-wu-lying-to-the-police/

Still hunting for the name of the judge.

you have any idea HOW MUCH senior counsels cost????????? LOL
money talks in this case for sure

http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/directory/senior_counsel.aspx

the hourly charge is not for the faint hearted




If my familee's actions are so honorable,
no need to get a lawyer to put a gag order on me
so that you can use your millions to keep suing me

 

[GoldenDragon]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

This report named the counsel acting for Woffles Wu - Senior Counsel Harry Elias.

http://everythingalsocomplain.com/2012/06/13/woffles-wu-lying-to-the-police/

Still hunting for the name of the judge.

Harry Elias is part of the establishment. WW got the right lawyer.

 

[Jumong]

Re: Shuffling, Woffling over Woffles - save us the Waffles

Harry Elias is part of the establishment. WW got the right lawyer.

Yes, I remember when old man's dad passed away, Harry was seen paying respect at Bishopgate bungalow.

 

[palden]

Re: Jokes for laugh
A crusty old man walks into a bank and says to the clerk at the window:

'I want to open a bloody bank account.' To which the astonished woman replies: 'I beg your pardon, sir; I must have misunderstood you. What did you say?' 'Listen up bitch! I said, I want to open a bloody bank account right now!'

'I'm very sorry sir, but we do not tolerate that kind of language in this bank.' Having said this, the clerk leaves the window and goes over to the bank manager to tell him about her problem customer. They both return and the manager asks the old geezer: 'What seems to be the problem here?'

'There's no bloody problem, sonny,' the elderly man says. 'I just won 25 million pounds in the damn lottery and I want to open a bloody bank account in this f***ing bank!' 'I see,' says the manager thoughtfully. 'And you're saying that this bitch here is giving you a hard time?'

Lesson: If you are RICH, you can get away with almost anything