Why Workers' Party?

[G00DUSAMI]

Why not? WP is the popular choice amongst the non-papies supporters.

Simple mathematics will tell you they will have a better chance.

 

[SgGoneWrong]

This is my 2nd time using the password to log in. Have been reading without doing so.

3 messages for me, one from Admin to inform me so problem solved for my posting. 2 more are the following :

Latest Reputation Received (4 point(s) total)
15-12-2012 08:14 AM
Thread: Why Workers' Party?
farking PAP lapdog
15-12-2012 06:34 AM
Thread: Why Workers' Party?
Because you are plain STUPID. Ask only 1 WP supporter and you pleased. Go Pay and Pay MORE Since you love to be a ASS LICK for pap clowns !

Not sure how this point system works, I got points for private messages received to scold me?
Anyway, I don't appreciate the points if that's the case.

I voted for opposition that contested in my grc last time, not WP though. So pls don't insult me. if those insult me are WP supporters, I'm gonna tell you that you have turned away more non supporters of WP like me than covert us. If Chiam See Tong alone can speak up for the people, I don't understand about the logic of WP to show disinterest in national issues, as though they will suddenly come to life in parliament when they have 30-40% in. If WP supporters have forgotten, this is what WP 2011 election campaign says, to vote for them for 1st world parliament and be co-drivers to slap the driver in misguided direction. Does this sound like what WP has been doing? Is 1st world parliament about maintaining silence in parliament?

Even if WP wins another seat in parliament, it will make no difference. If WP is selfless, they could support another party to get in. People will judge their performance and decide for themselves.

The useful point made so far by forumers is that WP has the greatest chance about opposition parties to win, so should support them.

Last note for WP supporters, don't curse and swear at non supporters for your beloved party. If you can't even convince or give evidence but turn to anger as a response, it only further prove to me that yours is blind faith.

 

[Goh Meng Seng]

Your description doesn't fit TKL. TKL has quit from PAP quite a number of years ago.You expect him to be PAP member after the Minibond Saga?


Your description is more apt for the candidate supported by WP people.

Goh Meng Seng

Of course you don't find any problem with TKL. A PAP cadre only a year before he stood for elections, ate from the iron rice bowl of NTUC for two decades, disparaged NTUC's insurance policies the moment he left, tried to paint himself as independent, speaks mangled English and sells paper cranes and sudoko puzzles for a living, is infinitely better than say, a man like TCB who can command votes form both sides of the political aisle.

 

[Goh Meng Seng]

It is relativity. You are not neutral, thus you see I am bias.

So far, beside ranting bias and unfounded accusations at me, have anyone of you WP people able to talk sense in debunking my points? All the weaknesses of WP raised by me are all true and valid. Many more people are raising these and slowly, even more people will see clearly of tese weaknesses. Only time will tell.


Goh Meng Seng

Blind support is unhealthy and so is blind disdain. Your bias has been established so deeply that appealing to any court in this world will be thrown out.

VW who had to apologize for a pointless remark is a good politician to you. If the same person was in WP, he will have been condemned to no end. The secret squirrel, if this was other opposition party, would have been PAP's ultimate evil scheme, but was a good thing when it came to WP. Then we are not spared the agony of hearing you try to explain the difference between Fuji apples and Red Delicious.

Opinion makers (not saying you are one) giving biased, unbalanced and provisory presentations is also not healthy for readers to make judgements.

 

[godiva]

It is relativity. You are not neutral, thus you see I am bias.

So far, beside ranting bias and unfounded accusations at me, have anyone of you WP people able to talk sense in debunking my points? All the weaknesses of WP raised by me are all true and valid. Many more people are raising these and slowly, even more people will see clearly of tese weaknesses. Only time will tell.


Goh Meng Seng

GMS,

i seemed to remember you saying you wanted to others to take 'revenge' on WP. got or not? so are you in fact the bias one?

 

[SgGoneWrong]

Mr Goh Meng Seng and those who have issues with him, pls start a new thread to fight it out and not on mine. Thank you.

 

[ray_of_hope]

If WP is selfless, they could support another party to get in.

Naive at best. No political party does things for selfless reasons, especially not to assist another political party.
I wonder where you got that from.

 

[godiva]

Mr Goh Meng Seng and those who have issues with him, pls start a new thread to fight it out and not on mine. Thank you.

Mr Lau Lan,

Who are you to decide who can or cannot post in your thread? You the forum owner?

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Your description doesn't fit TKL. TKL has quit from PAP quite a number of years ago.You expect him to be PAP member after the Minibond Saga

Goh Meng Seng

Ok. Not one year ago. 3 years ago he was still PAP cadre. Whilst still eating the delicious fruit he kept mum and played the good boy. When he quit immediately started to paint himself as independent. The cantonese have a saying, eat rice overturn rice bowl.

 

[Goh Meng Seng]

The point you made fit more to the very candidate you and other WP people supported!

Goh Meng Seng

Ok. Not one year ago. 3 years ago he was still PAP cadre. Whilst still eating the delicious fruit he kept mum and played the good boy. When he quit immediately started to paint himself as independent. The cantonese have a saying, eat rice overturn rice bowl.