![]()
![]()
How did Hermes let Coach off like that ?
![]()
![]()
And high and mighty SIA diam diam never pursue this Thailand bus company ?
same reason as this lo.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How did Hermes let Coach off like that ?
They are both customer focused companies? The respective owners know each other / are related? The brands are distinctive enough and discerning consumers are not fooled?
Just thinking: but most importantly, if the brand is focused on customer satisfaction and customers are not confused, then sue will only profit the lawyers and will not change status quo.
Also, assuming Hermes existed before COACH, then if not sure like after WW2 (end 1945), what is there to sue now like > half century too late. Average man would also be sophisticated enough to distinguish based on the Roman characters: so each trademark is sufficiently unique.
http://www.duetsblog.com/2014/01/articles/trademarks/horse-drawn-trademark-collision/One is horse pulling carriage. The other is carriage pulling the horae. Difference is night and day
![]()
![]()
How did Hermes let Coach off like that ?
prefer the hermes logo as the rider is kindly leading the horse to the water - if don't drink oso nebermindOne is horse pulling carriage. The other is carriage pulling the horae. Difference is night and day
exactly, if the taiwanese granny brings it to the mkt and packs the fish insai, it's customer satisfaction to the maxJust thinking: but most importantly, if the brand is focused on customer satisfaction and customers are not confused, then sue will only profit the lawyers and will not change status quo.
prefer the hermes logo as the rider is kindly leading the horse to the water - if don't drink oso nebermind
...