Why the Double Standard in Exposing 17 Years old Minors?

[Confuseous]

I don't understand why Singapore media wants to expose the five suspects who are 17 years old in the graffiti case (that hurled vulgarities at the PAP), yet keep the identity of the 17 years old female escort a secret? Fact is she willingly slept with so many men for money. What is the difference? Didn't research prove that girls mature earlier than boys?

Even though I'm a woman, I think its wrong to expose the boys when they are not proven guilty yet. It kinda conveys the message that PAP government is petty, and is all out to punish the young suspects before proving beyond reasonable doubt they are guilty.

http://happyartfood.blogspot.sg/2014/05/why-double-standard-in-exposing-17.html

 

[ILovePAP]

actually true hor...PAP never expose the pics of those loansharks harassers charged in court before!

 

[davetan3]

its not the media but the judge or courts that have a say??
Personal opinion is that laws are written by men and men then to have a hazy notion about young gals being innocent and naive.
Then again, many young women are forced into prostitution or escorts for money so rather than deciding case by case - a blanket to cover identities of all woman be more efficient.
Vandalism however, is not forced but a wilful act.