• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why opposition should shun the "watchdog" label

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
12,289
Points
113
Here's why opposition should shun the "watchdog" label: It won't attract talented people into its ranks.

People who join politics especially opposition politics know the sacrifice in terms of personal and family time and career. No person of real substance is going to join an opposition party just to be watchdog. It is simply too expensive in terms of personal sacrifice and commitment.

There must be some ideal or national objective to strive for. A watchdog is not a national objective. It is a label used to castigate the opposition in a corner where it cannot have manoeuvrings.

A watchdog cannot take on national issues or represent a broad segment of the population. It is time to cast this PAP label away. I was absolutely disgusted when my friend said we need opposition because it is good to have watchdog. It degrade my view of the opposition.
 
Back
Top