I thought is supposed to happen in early Jul. Today is already 10Jul , and no sound no picture. Is it as usual time will heal everything ? I am disappointed that no thread in SBF I could find for updates. 
:*:
:*:
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Why no more news of Roy Vs PM match ?
- Thread starter chootchiew
- Start date
Draw pays $3.20.:o
LOL SBF too busy betting WC 2014 , ended all Draw match. Roy match also taking as Draw .
I thought is supposed to happen in early Jul. Today is already 10Jul , and no sound no picture. Is it as usual time will heal everything ? I am disappointed that no thread in SBF I could find for updates.
Everyone has lost interest. People have short attention spans and Roy will soon learn that there is little point being the fall guy for his fellow citizens because the sacrifices he has made will soon be but a distant memory.
When 2016 comes round, all they'll remember is that PAP is the best.
Can they share a bed-room ?
LOL uniquely Sinkapore ! Roy can now kowtow to PM and offer him tea, after that enjoy his hundreds of Ks of donation.
I thought is supposed to happen in early Jul. Today is already 10Jul , and no sound no picture. Is it as usual time will heal everything ? I am disappointed that no thread in SBF I could find for updates.
gay Loong and his lawyer Diveinyour Shit are still running the Cray super computer to calculate the damages mah. donch disturb them can or not?
maybe someone on sammyboy forum can write another defamatory article about clown lee?that should stir things up a little.
Please start the ball rolling, I will donate to you if you require.
Can they share a bed-room ?
One wear pink lingerie they other pink drawers...
cut and paste
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2014/07/lee-applies-for-summary-judgement-against-ngerng/
July 11
17:15 2014
Mr Lee Hsien Loong has applied to the courts for a summary judgement in his defamation lawsuit against blogger Roy Ngerng.
A summary judgment is a judgment entered by a court for one party against another party without the case going through a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. It is used when there is no dispute on the material facts of the case and a party is entitled to judgment
Mr Lee, who is also the prime minister of Singapore but is bringing the legal action in his personal capacity, sued Mr Ngerng on 30 May over a blog article which Mr Ngerng had written and published.
The article, Mr Lee claims, had accused him of “criminal misappropriation” with regards to monies from the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a national and compulsory savings scheme.
In his application for summary judgement on Friday, Mr Lee, represented by lawyers from Drew and Napier, is seeking the courts to determine “the natural and ordinary meaning of the words and images” contained in the offending article.
Mr Lee is also seeking damages and for an order for Mr Ngerng to be “restrained from publishing or disseminating that the Plaintiff… is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans” to the CPF.
Mr Lee is also seeking costs from Mr Ngerng.
“The Court has jurisdiction and this is the proper case to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the offending words and images,” Mr Lee’s submission said.
“The defendant has no defence to the Plaintiff’s claim and the only issue to be determined is damages,” it added.
Mr Ngerng had earlier complied with demands made by Mr Lee, including issuing an apology, removing the offending article and four others, and making an offer of compensation, which was subsequently rejected by Mr Lee, who described the S$5,000 offer as “derisory.”
When contacted by The Online Citizen (TOC), Mr M Ravi, who is representing Mr Ngerng, said, “As Roy’s lawyer I will be making submissions to vigorously resist the prime minister’s application for summary judgement.”
Should the application for summary be allowed, we understand that the next stage will be an assessment of damages hearing where the prime minister will be crossed examined on the issue of the quantum of damages Mr Ngerng will have to pay him.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2014/07/lee-applies-for-summary-judgement-against-ngerng/
July 11
17:15 2014
Mr Lee Hsien Loong has applied to the courts for a summary judgement in his defamation lawsuit against blogger Roy Ngerng.
A summary judgment is a judgment entered by a court for one party against another party without the case going through a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. It is used when there is no dispute on the material facts of the case and a party is entitled to judgment
Mr Lee, who is also the prime minister of Singapore but is bringing the legal action in his personal capacity, sued Mr Ngerng on 30 May over a blog article which Mr Ngerng had written and published.
The article, Mr Lee claims, had accused him of “criminal misappropriation” with regards to monies from the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a national and compulsory savings scheme.
In his application for summary judgement on Friday, Mr Lee, represented by lawyers from Drew and Napier, is seeking the courts to determine “the natural and ordinary meaning of the words and images” contained in the offending article.
Mr Lee is also seeking damages and for an order for Mr Ngerng to be “restrained from publishing or disseminating that the Plaintiff… is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans” to the CPF.
Mr Lee is also seeking costs from Mr Ngerng.
“The Court has jurisdiction and this is the proper case to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the offending words and images,” Mr Lee’s submission said.
“The defendant has no defence to the Plaintiff’s claim and the only issue to be determined is damages,” it added.
Mr Ngerng had earlier complied with demands made by Mr Lee, including issuing an apology, removing the offending article and four others, and making an offer of compensation, which was subsequently rejected by Mr Lee, who described the S$5,000 offer as “derisory.”
When contacted by The Online Citizen (TOC), Mr M Ravi, who is representing Mr Ngerng, said, “As Roy’s lawyer I will be making submissions to vigorously resist the prime minister’s application for summary judgement.”
Should the application for summary be allowed, we understand that the next stage will be an assessment of damages hearing where the prime minister will be crossed examined on the issue of the quantum of damages Mr Ngerng will have to pay him.
the reason i side with roy is simple, when i looked at him, i was reminded of how i was bullied by the old guards at ST and SAF.
i was reminded of another story, my elder brother has a contractor friend, he has a son who was bullied at school by another boy, so this father went to school and beat up the bully. following the next day, the father bought a living chicken and essence to school and apologise to the child who was beaten up by him. the moral of the story is dun think that beating up someone, like me, and there is no accountability is OKAY. i will seek damages by hook or by crook.
i was reminded of another story, my elder brother has a contractor friend, he has a son who was bullied at school by another boy, so this father went to school and beat up the bully. following the next day, the father bought a living chicken and essence to school and apologise to the child who was beaten up by him. the moral of the story is dun think that beating up someone, like me, and there is no accountability is OKAY. i will seek damages by hook or by crook.
I want to buy Roy makan $100,000 settlement fees, length of trial over 2.5 days. Can someone quote me the odds?
In Singapore, court verdicts regarding the govt are well known in advance. Even the best lawyer in the world cant help you. So why bother?
Similar threads
